• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在两年期间,被转诊至专科血管单位的大肾下腹部主动脉瘤患者的命运。

The fate of patients referred to a specialist vascular unit with large infra-renal abdominal aortic aneurysms over a two-year period.

机构信息

St George's Vascular Institute, St George's Hospital Healthcare NHS Trust, London SW17 0QT, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011 Sep;42(3):295-301. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2011.04.022. Epub 2011 May 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejvs.2011.04.022
PMID:21576025
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The basic premise in managing patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) must be to reduce overall mortality from the disease. Operative mortality is widely reported, but data on patients deemed unsuitable for repair are scarce. The purpose of the present study was to report the fate of patients referred with AAA, to define the proportion deemed unsuitable for surgery and to investigate the reasons for conservative treatment.

METHODS

All patients who were referred to a regional vascular centre with large (>5.5 cm) infra-renal AAA between 1st January 2008 and 31st December 2009 were included. Patients were classified into two groups; those managed non-operatively, or those offered elective repair. Survival was reported by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Multivariate analysis investigated factors leading to non-operative management.

RESULTS

251 patients with a mean (s.d.) age of 75(8) years were assessed. Thirty-two (13%) patients were deemed unsuitable for repair, mostly because of medical co-morbidity (16/32). 219/251 (87%) patients underwent repair (25/251 (10%) open repair 194/251 (77%) EVAR) with 1/219 (0.5%) 30-day mortality. AAA repair was associated with significantly greater survival (p < 0.001, log-rank test) at 2 years. In multivariate analysis Glasgow Aneurysm Score, female gender and respiratory disease were significant predictors of the decision to treat patients conservatively (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Most patients were suitable for surgical intervention with low perioperative mortality. Data on "turndown" rates should be routinely reported to quantify the denominator for operative success.

摘要

介绍

管理腹主动脉瘤(AAA)患者的基本前提必须是降低该疾病的总体死亡率。手术死亡率已被广泛报道,但关于不适合手术修复的患者的数据却很少。本研究的目的是报告患有 AAA 的患者的情况,确定被认为不适合手术的患者比例,并调查保守治疗的原因。

方法

所有在 2008 年 1 月 1 日至 2009 年 12 月 31 日期间被转诊至区域性血管中心的大(>5.5 厘米)肾下 AAA 患者均被纳入本研究。患者被分为两组:非手术治疗组或择期手术修复组。采用 Kaplan-Meier 分析报告生存率。多变量分析调查了导致非手术治疗的因素。

结果

评估了 251 例平均(标准差)年龄为 75(8)岁的患者。32 例(13%)患者被认为不适合手术修复,主要是由于合并症(16/32)。251 例患者中有 219 例(87%)接受了手术修复(25/251 例(10%)开放修复,194/251 例(77%)EVAR),其中 1/219 例(0.5%)在 30 天内死亡。AAA 修复与显著更高的生存相关(p < 0.001,对数秩检验),2 年生存率为 77%。在多变量分析中,格拉斯哥动脉瘤评分、女性性别和呼吸系统疾病是决定保守治疗患者的显著预测因素(p < 0.001)。

结论

大多数患者适合手术干预,围手术期死亡率较低。“拒绝”率的数据应定期报告,以量化手术成功的分母。

相似文献

1
The fate of patients referred to a specialist vascular unit with large infra-renal abdominal aortic aneurysms over a two-year period.在两年期间,被转诊至专科血管单位的大肾下腹部主动脉瘤患者的命运。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011 Sep;42(3):295-301. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2011.04.022. Epub 2011 May 14.
2
Measure what matters: institutional outcome data are superior to the use of surrogate markers to define "center of excellence" for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.衡量关键指标:机构结局数据优于使用替代指标来定义腹主动脉瘤修复的“卓越中心”。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2008 May-Jun;22(3):328-34. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2007.09.013. Epub 2008 Apr 14.
3
Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in high risk patients: outcomes of management.高危患者的腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术:治疗结果
J Med Assoc Thai. 2007 Oct;90(10):2080-9.
4
Outcome of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the era of endovascular treatment.血管内治疗时代腹主动脉瘤修复的结果
Br J Surg. 2004 May;91(5):563-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4529.
5
What is the best management for abdominal aortic aneurysm in patients at high surgical risk? A single-center review.对于手术风险高的患者,腹主动脉瘤的最佳治疗方法是什么?一项单中心回顾性研究。
Int Angiol. 2005 Mar;24(1):70-4.
6
Analysis of outcome after using high-risk criteria selection to surgery versus endovascular repair in the modern era of abdominal aortic aneurysm treatment.分析在现代腹主动脉瘤治疗时代,使用高危标准选择手术与血管内修复的结果。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010 Apr;39(4):403-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.12.009. Epub 2010 Jan 8.
7
Propensity score analysis in observational studies: outcomes after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.观察性研究中的倾向评分分析:腹主动脉瘤修复术后的结局
Am J Surg. 2006 Sep;192(3):336-43. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.03.009.
8
Improving results of elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair at a low-volume hospital by risk-adjusted selection of treatment in the endovascular era.在血管内治疗时代,通过风险调整后的治疗选择来提高低容量医院择期腹主动脉瘤修复的效果。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2009 Sep;32(5):918-22. doi: 10.1007/s00270-009-9538-2. Epub 2009 Mar 19.
9
A comparison of the mid-term results following the use of bifurcated and aorto-uni-iliac devices in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms.分叉型和主动脉-单侧髂动脉装置用于治疗腹主动脉瘤的中期结果比较。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009 Sep;38(3):298-304. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.06.004. Epub 2009 Jul 16.
10
Open versus endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in VA hospitals.退伍军人事务部医院中开放性与血管腔内腹主动脉瘤修复术的比较
J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Apr;202(4):577-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.01.005.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of women-specific size threshold and mortality in elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.择期腹主动脉瘤修复中女性特定大小阈值与死亡率的关系。
Br J Surg. 2024 Jan 3;111(1). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad376.
2
Sex Differences in Rupture Risk and Mortality in Untreated Patients With Intact Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.未治疗的腹主动脉瘤患者破裂风险和死亡率的性别差异。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Feb;10(5):e019592. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019592. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
3
Therapeutic effect of allogeneic bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells on aortic aneurysms.
同种异体骨髓间充质基质细胞治疗主动脉瘤的疗效。
Cell Tissue Res. 2021 Feb;383(2):781-793. doi: 10.1007/s00441-020-03295-6. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
4
Sex differences in mortality after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the UK.英国腹主动脉瘤修复术后的死亡率性别差异。
Br J Surg. 2017 Nov;104(12):1656-1664. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10600. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
5
Morphological suitability for endovascular repair, non-intervention rates, and operative mortality in women and men assessed for intact abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: systematic reviews with meta-analysis.评估女性和男性腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术的形态学适合性、非介入率和手术死亡率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2017 Jun 24;389(10088):2482-2491. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30639-6. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
6
Reporting individual surgeon outcomes does not lead to risk aversion in abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery.报告个体外科医生的手术结果并不会导致腹主动脉瘤手术中的风险规避。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2017 Feb;99(2):161-165. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2017.0005. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
7
Endovascular aneurysm sealing for the treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms.血管内动脉瘤封堵术治疗破裂性腹主动脉瘤。
J Endovasc Ther. 2015 Jun;22(3):283-7. doi: 10.1177/1526602815582529. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
8
A systematic review and meta-analysis indicates underreporting of renal dysfunction following endovascular aneurysm repair.一项系统评价和荟萃分析表明,血管内动脉瘤修复术后肾功能障碍的报告不足。
Kidney Int. 2015 Feb;87(2):442-51. doi: 10.1038/ki.2014.272. Epub 2014 Aug 20.