Regulation of N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase V activity. Kinetic comparisons of parental, Rous sarcoma virus-transformed BHK, and L-phytohemagglutinin-resistant BHK cells using synthetic substrates and an inhibitory substrate analog.

Baby hamster kidney (BHK) cells transformed with Rous sarcoma virus, RS-BHK cells, demonstrate a 2.5-fold increase in the activity of N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase V (GlcNAc-T V, EC 2.4.1.155), and this increase in activity appears to be specific for this enzyme. By contrast, a lectin-resistant BHK cell line selected for its ability to grow in high levels of L-phytohemagglutinin, LP3.3, is characterized by a specific decrease in its GlcNAc-T V activity. To test if these alterations in the apparent Vmax of GlcNAc-T V are due to changes in the efficiency of populations of enzymes in RS-BHK and LP3.3 cells compared to the parental BHK cells, we have compared the kinetic properties of the enzymes from these three sources. The Km constants observed for both the sugar nucleotide donor (UDP-GlcNAc) and two synthetic trisaccharide acceptors were indistinguishable. The Vmax values toward three synthetic acceptors were also determined first for the BHK GlcNAc-T V, and they varied by over 5-fold. When these values were measured for the variant and transformed cell enzymes, however, similar 5-fold differences were still observed, although the absolute values for these acceptors were all higher or lower for the RS-BHK and LP3.3 enzymes, respectively. In addition, we have synthesized a deoxygenated analog of the specific GlcNAc-T V acceptor, beta GlcNAc(1,2) alpha Man(1,6) beta ManOR, where the reactive 6'-OH group has been removed, and the resulting trisaccharide was found to be a competitive inhibitor of the enzyme. The Ki for this inhibitor was near 70 microM for the GlcNAc-T V from all three sources. These kinetic comparisons demonstrate that the enzymes from the three cell types have kinetically indistinguishable active sites. These results suggest that the differences in the apparent Vmax values among the cell types are most likely due to alterations in the number of active molecules rather than in the modulation of either their catalytic activities or specificities.