RTI International, 1440 Main Street, Waltham, MA 02451, USA.
Med Care. 2011 Sep;49(9):842-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31821b34db.
The Medicaid program plays a critical role in providing insurance coverage for many low-income beneficiaries who are diagnosed with cancer. Several states have increased their copayment requirements in the past few years and this provides a natural experiment to study the impact of copayments.
We used Medicaid administrative data linked with cancer registry data for the years 1999 to 2004 from Georgia (intervention state with increases in copayments), Texas (control state A), and South Carolina (control state B) to study the impact of copayments on adult (aged from 18 to 64 y) Medicaid beneficiaries diagnosed with cancer (n=10,241). We report both pre/post and difference-in-difference assessments controlling for confounding factors including demographics, comorbidities, cancer site, and stage at diagnosis.
After copayments were imposed, the number of days of supply of prescription drugs in the intervention state decreased by 127.4 and 150.1 days compared with control state A and B, respectively. Those with multiple comorbidities reduced their use of prescription drug the most. The proportion of beneficiaries with emergency room visits also increased in the intervention state compared with the control states. Overall, total 6-month cost was more than $2000 higher per patient in the intervention than the control states.
The results show that Medicaid patients with cancer when faced with even moderate copayments change their health-seeking behavior. State Medicaid programs should reconsider the use of copayments as they do not decrease overall cost, but instead could potentially result in negative consequences.
医疗补助计划(Medicaid program)在为许多被诊断患有癌症的低收入受益人群提供保险方面发挥着关键作用。在过去的几年中,一些州增加了共付额要求,这为研究共付额的影响提供了一个自然实验。
我们使用了佐治亚州(干预州,共付额增加)、德克萨斯州(对照州 A)和南卡罗来纳州(对照州 B)的医疗保险管理数据与癌症登记数据进行了关联,这些数据涵盖了 1999 年至 2004 年的时间,研究了共付额对被诊断患有癌症的成年(18 至 64 岁)医疗补助受益人的影响(n=10241)。我们报告了在控制混杂因素(包括人口统计学、合并症、癌症部位和诊断时的阶段)的情况下,前后比较和差异分析的结果。
在实施共付额后,干预州的处方药供应天数分别比对照州 A 和 B 减少了 127.4 和 150.1 天。合并症较多的患者减少了处方药的使用量最大。与对照州相比,干预州的急诊就诊受益人的比例也有所增加。总体而言,干预州的每位患者的 6 个月总成本比对照州高出 2000 多美元。
结果表明,面临中度共付额的医疗补助癌症患者会改变他们的就医行为。州医疗补助计划应重新考虑共付额的使用,因为它不会降低总体成本,反而可能导致负面后果。