• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

外科肿瘤学家与普通外科医生之间乳腺癌治疗结局改善的机制。

Mechanisms of improved outcomes for breast cancer between surgical oncologists and general surgeons.

机构信息

OU Breast Institute, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Nov;18(12):3248-51. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1771-7. Epub 2011 May 17.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-011-1771-7
PMID:21584834
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prior multi-institutional studies have reported a survival benefit of breast cancer treatment by surgical oncologists (SO) over general surgeons (GS).

METHODS

Retrospective review tumor registry data of all breast cancer patients receiving primary treatment at a single institution from January 1, 1995, to December 31, 2008.

RESULTS

During the time period, there were 2192 patients who received primary breast cancer treatment at this institution. The mean age was 57 years and the mean follow-up was >55 months. Stage distribution was similar between GS and SO. Overall survival (SO 83.8% vs. GS 75.6%) and disease-free survival (SO 80.7% vs. GS 72.0%) was highly statistically significant (P<0.0001). For stages 1, 2a, 2b, 3a, and 3b there were statistically significant (P<0.05) differences for overall and disease-free survival. Overall, the use of breast conservation was more likely by SO-52.6 vs. 38.3% all stages and 65.8 vs. 54.0% for stage 0-2. The compliance with all systemic therapies (chemotherapy and hormone therapy) was more likely if being treated by SO-77.3 vs. 68.5% (P<0.02). The use of radiotherapy for breast conservation and in stage 3 mastectomy patients was higher for SO (P<0.001). Participation in clinical trials was far higher for SO patients-56.2 vs. GS 7.0% (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The value added by having primary breast cancer treatment by a SO seems to arise from the more successful completion of multidisciplinary care in a timely fashion and higher rates of clinical trial involvement.

摘要

背景

先前的多机构研究报告称,乳腺癌患者接受外科肿瘤学家(SO)治疗比接受普通外科医生(GS)治疗的生存率更高。

方法

回顾性分析单机构 1995 年 1 月 1 日至 2008 年 12 月 31 日期间所有接受原发性乳腺癌治疗的患者的肿瘤登记数据。

结果

在此期间,有 2192 名患者在该机构接受了原发性乳腺癌治疗。平均年龄为 57 岁,平均随访时间超过 55 个月。GS 和 SO 组的分期分布相似。总体生存率(SO 为 83.8%,GS 为 75.6%)和无病生存率(SO 为 80.7%,GS 为 72.0%)差异具有统计学意义(P<0.0001)。对于 1 期、2a 期、2b 期、3a 期和 3b 期,总体生存率和无病生存率均存在统计学差异(P<0.05)。总体而言,SO 组保乳术的使用率更高(SO 组为 52.6%,GS 组为 38.3%,所有分期;SO 组为 65.8%,GS 组为 54.0%,0-2 期)。如果由 SO 治疗,患者接受全身治疗(化疗和激素治疗)的依从性更高(SO 组为 77.3%,GS 组为 68.5%,P<0.02)。SO 组用于保乳术和 3 期乳房切除术患者的放疗使用率更高(P<0.001)。SO 患者参与临床试验的比例远高于 GS 患者(SO 组为 56.2%,GS 组为 7.0%,P<0.001)。

结论

SO 对原发性乳腺癌的治疗价值似乎源于及时完成多学科治疗的更高成功率和更高的临床试验参与率。

相似文献

1
Mechanisms of improved outcomes for breast cancer between surgical oncologists and general surgeons.外科肿瘤学家与普通外科医生之间乳腺癌治疗结局改善的机制。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Nov;18(12):3248-51. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1771-7. Epub 2011 May 17.
2
The effect of dedicated breast surgeons on the short-term outcomes in breast cancer.乳腺专科外科医生对乳腺癌短期治疗效果的影响。
Ann Surg. 2008 Aug;248(2):280-5. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181784647.
3
Breast conservation surgery achieving>or=2 mm tumor-free margins results in decreased local-regional recurrence rates.保乳手术切缘达到≥2毫米无肿瘤残留可降低局部区域复发率。
Breast J. 2006 Jan-Feb;12(1):28-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2006.00181.x.
4
Feasibility of breast-conserving surgery for patients with breast carcinoma associated with nipple discharge.乳头溢液相关乳腺癌患者保乳手术的可行性
Cancer. 2004 Aug 1;101(3):508-17. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20394.
5
Changes in management techniques and patterns of disease recurrence over time in patients with breast carcinoma treated with breast-conserving therapy at a single institution.在一家机构接受保乳治疗的乳腺癌患者中,管理技术的变化以及疾病复发模式随时间的变化情况。
Cancer. 2004 Aug 15;101(4):713-20. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20410.
6
Prognostic value of breast cancer subtypes on breast cancer specific survival, distant metastases and local relapse rates in conservatively managed early stage breast cancer: a retrospective clinical study.保乳治疗早期乳腺癌中乳腺癌亚型对乳腺癌特异性生存、远处转移和局部复发率的预后价值:一项回顾性临床研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011 Oct;37(10):876-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2011.07.001. Epub 2011 Aug 6.
7
[Clinical analysis of resectable breast cancer: a report of 6 263 cases].可切除乳腺癌的临床分析:6263例报告
Ai Zheng. 2005 Mar;24(3):327-31.
8
Locoregional recurrence of breast cancer: a retrospective comparison of treatment methods.乳腺癌的局部区域复发:治疗方法的回顾性比较
Neoplasma. 2002;49(6):426-31.
9
Improving local control with breast-conserving therapy: a 27-year single-institution experience.保乳治疗改善局部控制:一项27年的单机构经验。
Cancer. 2005 Jul 1;104(1):20-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21121.
10
Long-term outcomes of IMRT for breast cancer: a single-institution cohort analysis.乳腺癌调强放疗的长期疗效:单机构队列分析
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Nov 15;72(4):1031-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.02.053. Epub 2008 Apr 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Physician-level variation in axillary surgery in older adults with T1N0 hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: A retrospective population-based cohort study.老年 T1N0 激素受体阳性乳腺癌患者腋窝手术中医生水平的差异:一项回顾性基于人群的队列研究。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2024 Jun;15(5):101795. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2024.101795. Epub 2024 May 16.
2
Surgeon Factors Influencing Breast Surgery Outcomes: A Scoping Review to Define the Modern Breast Surgical Oncologist.影响乳房手术结果的外科医生因素:定义现代乳房外科肿瘤学家的范围综述。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Aug;30(8):4695-4713. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13472-w. Epub 2023 Apr 10.
3
Multidisciplinary care of breast cancer patients: a scoping review of multidisciplinary styles, processes, and outcomes.
乳腺癌患者的多学科护理:多学科模式、流程和结果的范围综述。
Curr Oncol. 2019 Jun;26(3):e385-e397. doi: 10.3747/co.26.4713. Epub 2019 Jun 1.
4
The positive impact of surgeon specialization on survival for gastric cancer patients after surgery with curative intent.外科医生专业化对接受根治性手术的胃癌患者术后生存的积极影响。
Gastric Cancer. 2015 Oct;18(4):859-67. doi: 10.1007/s10120-014-0436-1. Epub 2014 Oct 15.
5
Resection probability maps for quality assessment of glioma surgery without brain location bias.无脑区定位偏差的脑胶质瘤手术质量评估的切除概率图
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 6;8(9):e73353. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073353. eCollection 2013.
6
Patient, hospital, and neighborhood factors associated with treatment of early-stage breast cancer among Asian American women in California.加利福尼亚州亚裔美国女性早期乳腺癌治疗与患者、医院和社区因素相关。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012 May;21(5):821-34. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-1143. Epub 2012 Mar 8.