• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

纯词表和混合词表中形符区别性的分离效应:项目顺序说。

Dissociative effects of orthographic distinctiveness in pure and mixed lists: an item-order account.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Washington University, Campus Box 1125, St. Louis, MO 63130-4899, USA.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2011 Oct;39(7):1162-73. doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0097-9.

DOI:10.3758/s13421-011-0097-9
PMID:21584853
Abstract

We apply the item-order theory of list composition effects in free recall to the orthographic distinctiveness effect. The item-order account assumes that orthographically distinct items advantage item-specific encoding in both mixed and pure lists, but at the expense of exploiting relational information present in the list. Experiment 1 replicated the typical free recall advantage of orthographically distinct items in mixed lists and the elimination of that advantage in pure lists. Supporting the item-order account, recognition performances indicated that orthographically distinct items received greater item-specific encoding than did orthographically common items in mixed and pure lists (Experiments 1 and 2). Furthermore, order memory (input-output correspondence and sequential contiguity effects) was evident in recall of pure unstructured common lists, but not in recall of unstructured distinct lists (Experiment 1). These combined patterns, although not anticipated by prevailing views, are consistent with an item-order account.

摘要

我们将项目排序理论应用于列表组合效应中的自由回忆,来研究正字法独特性效应。项目排序假设在混合列表和纯列表中,正字法独特的项目有利于项目特定的编码,但代价是利用列表中存在的关系信息。实验 1 复制了混合列表中正字法独特项目的典型自由回忆优势,以及在纯列表中消除该优势的情况。支持项目排序假设,识别表现表明在混合列表和纯列表中,正字法独特的项目比正字法常见的项目获得了更大的项目特定编码(实验 1 和 2)。此外,在纯无结构常见列表的回忆中,出现了顺序记忆(输入-输出对应和顺序连续性效应),但在无结构独特列表的回忆中则没有(实验 1)。这些综合模式虽然不符合流行观点的预期,但与项目排序假设一致。

相似文献

1
Dissociative effects of orthographic distinctiveness in pure and mixed lists: an item-order account.纯词表和混合词表中形符区别性的分离效应:项目顺序说。
Mem Cognit. 2011 Oct;39(7):1162-73. doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0097-9.
2
The curious case of orthographic distinctiveness: Disruption of categorical processing.正字法独特性的奇特案例:范畴加工的破坏。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Jan;42(1):104-13. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000160. Epub 2015 Aug 3.
3
Instability in memory phenomena: a common puzzle and a unifying explanation.记忆现象的不稳定性:一个常见难题及统一解释。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Apr;15(2):237-55. doi: 10.3758/pbr.15.2.237.
4
The drawing effect: Evidence for costs and benefits using pure and mixed lists.绘图效应:使用纯列表和混合列表的成本和收益证据。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Aug;52(6):1408-1421. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01551-6. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
5
Testing a Strategy-Disruption Account of the List-Strength Effect.检验列表强度效应的策略中断解释
Exp Psychol. 2020 Jul;67(4):255-275. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000494.
6
Order information and retrieval distinctiveness: recall of common versus bizarre material.顺序信息与检索独特性:常见材料与奇异材料的回忆
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000 Jul;26(4):1045-56. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.26.4.1045.
7
Distinctive encoding of a subset of DRM lists yields not only benefits, but also costs and spillovers.特定的 DRM 列表子集的编码不仅带来了好处,也带来了成本和溢出效应。
Psychol Res. 2021 Feb;85(1):280-290. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01241-y. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
8
Order information is used to guide recall of long lists: Further evidence for the item-order account.订单信息用于指导长列表的回忆:项目顺序理论的进一步证据。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2016 Jun;70(2):125-38. doi: 10.1037/cep0000088.
9
Effects of word frequency on individual-item and serial order retention: tests of the order-encoding view.词频对单个项目和序列顺序保持的影响:顺序编码观点的检验
Mem Cognit. 2006 Dec;34(8):1615-27. doi: 10.3758/bf03195924.
10
Conditional recall and the frequency effect in the serial recall task: an examination of item-to-item associativity.条件回忆与序列回忆任务中的频率效应:项目间关联性的考察。
Mem Cognit. 2012 Nov;40(8):1246-56. doi: 10.3758/s13421-012-0221-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Temporal organization of narrative recall is present but attenuated in adults with hippocampal amnesia.海马体遗忘症成人存在但减弱的叙事回忆的时间组织。
Hippocampus. 2024 Aug;34(8):438-451. doi: 10.1002/hipo.23620. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
2
Contiguity in episodic memory.情节记忆的连续性。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Jun;26(3):699-720. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1537-3.
3
Is memory search governed by universal principles or idiosyncratic strategies?记忆检索是受普遍原则还是特殊策略支配?

本文引用的文献

1
Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.在个体内设计中使用置信区间。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1994 Dec;1(4):476-90. doi: 10.3758/BF03210951.
2
A tutorial on a practical Bayesian alternative to null-hypothesis significance testing.关于实用贝叶斯替代零假设检验的教程。
Behav Res Methods. 2011 Sep;43(3):679-90. doi: 10.3758/s13428-010-0049-5.
3
A context-based theory of recency and contiguity in free recall.自由回忆中基于情境的近因和接近性理论。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Apr;143(2):575-96. doi: 10.1037/a0033715. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
4
The bizarreness effect: evidence for the critical influence of retrieval processes.奇异效应:检索过程的关键影响的证据。
Mem Cognit. 2013 Nov;41(8):1228-37. doi: 10.3758/s13421-013-0335-4.
5
Putting congeniality effects into context: Investigating the role of context in attitude memory using multiple paradigms.将融洽效应置于情境中:使用多种范式研究情境在态度记忆中的作用。
J Mem Lang. 2012 May 1;66(4):717-730. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2011.12.013.
Psychol Rev. 2008 Oct;115(4):893-912. doi: 10.1037/a0013396.
4
Instability in memory phenomena: a common puzzle and a unifying explanation.记忆现象的不稳定性:一个常见难题及统一解释。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Apr;15(2):237-55. doi: 10.3758/pbr.15.2.237.
5
A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values.解决p值普遍存在问题的实用方法。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Oct;14(5):779-804. doi: 10.3758/bf03194105.
6
A temporal ratio model of memory.记忆的时间比率模型。
Psychol Rev. 2007 Jul;114(3):539-76. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.3.539.
7
Effects of word frequency on individual-item and serial order retention: tests of the order-encoding view.词频对单个项目和序列顺序保持的影响:顺序编码观点的检验
Mem Cognit. 2006 Dec;34(8):1615-27. doi: 10.3758/bf03195924.
8
Disentangling encoding versus retrieval explanations of the bizarreness effect: implications for distinctiveness.
Mem Cognit. 2005 Mar;33(2):270-9. doi: 10.3758/bf03195316.
9
What causes the isolation effect?是什么导致了隔离效应?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001 Nov;27(6):1359-66.
10
Order information and retrieval distinctiveness: recall of common versus bizarre material.顺序信息与检索独特性:常见材料与奇异材料的回忆
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000 Jul;26(4):1045-56. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.26.4.1045.