• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非麻醉医师在儿科肿瘤手术中应用异丙酚与异丙酚-氯胺酮联合的比较。

Comparison of propofol versus propofol-ketamine combination in pediatric oncologic procedures performed by non-anesthesiologists.

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Sciences, Catholic University Medical School, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2011 Dec 15;57(7):1163-7. doi: 10.1002/pbc.23170. Epub 2011 May 16.

DOI:10.1002/pbc.23170
PMID:21584935
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Limited data are available on the best option (short acting sedatives, opioids, or ketamine) in oncologic procedural sedation performed by non-anesthesiologists. The aim of the present prospective study is to compare the safety and efficacy of propofol-ketamine versus propofol alone, managed by trained pediatricians, in children with cancer undergoing painful procedures.

PROCEDURES

Data on 121 children with acute lymphatic leukemia (ALL) undergoing procedural sedations (lumbar punctures and bone marrow aspirations) were prospectively collected and included drug doses, side effects, pain assessment, and sedation degree. Children were randomly assigned to one of the two groups: P (n = 62) receiving propofol alone and K (n = 59) in whom a ketamine-propofol combination was used.

RESULTS

In group K, the total dose of propofol required was significantly lower than in group P (3.9 ± 3.6 mg/kg vs. 5.1 ± 3.6 mg/kg; P < 0.001). The incidence of hypotension was also significantly lower (11% vs. 39%; P < 0.001). Major O(2) desaturations (defined as SatO(2) < 88%) occurred principally in group P (7 vs. 1; P = 0.05). Both best analgesia and shorter recovery time were obtained with the propofol-ketamine association. No differences were observed in the degree of sedation and in the awakening quality score between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of propofol and ketamine produced statistically significant clinical advantages combined with a higher profile of safety in children with cancer undergoing painful procedures.

摘要

背景

在非麻醉医师进行的肿瘤介入镇静中,关于最佳选择(短效镇静剂、阿片类药物或氯胺酮)的数据有限。本前瞻性研究的目的是比较在接受痛苦程序的癌症儿童中,由经过培训的儿科医生管理的丙泊酚-氯胺酮与单独使用丙泊酚的安全性和疗效。

程序

前瞻性收集了 121 例急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)患儿(行腰椎穿刺和骨髓抽吸术)的镇静数据,包括药物剂量、副作用、疼痛评估和镇静程度。患儿随机分为两组:P 组(n = 62)接受单独使用丙泊酚,K 组(n = 59)接受丙泊酚-氯胺酮联合使用。

结果

在 K 组中,所需的丙泊酚总剂量明显低于 P 组(3.9 ± 3.6 mg/kg 比 5.1 ± 3.6 mg/kg;P < 0.001)。低血压的发生率也明显较低(11%比 39%;P < 0.001)。主要的 O(2) 饱和度下降(定义为 SatO(2) < 88%)主要发生在 P 组(7 例比 1 例;P = 0.05)。丙泊酚-氯胺酮联合使用可获得最佳镇痛效果和更快的恢复时间。两组间镇静程度和苏醒质量评分无差异。

结论

在接受痛苦程序的癌症儿童中,丙泊酚和氯胺酮联合使用具有统计学显著的临床优势,同时具有更高的安全性。

相似文献

1
Comparison of propofol versus propofol-ketamine combination in pediatric oncologic procedures performed by non-anesthesiologists.非麻醉医师在儿科肿瘤手术中应用异丙酚与异丙酚-氯胺酮联合的比较。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2011 Dec 15;57(7):1163-7. doi: 10.1002/pbc.23170. Epub 2011 May 16.
2
Combination ketamine and propofol for procedural sedation and analgesia.氯胺酮与丙泊酚联合用于操作过程中的镇静和镇痛。
Pharmacotherapy. 2007 Nov;27(11):1588-98. doi: 10.1592/phco.27.11.1588.
3
Propofol versus propofol/ketamine for brief painful procedures in the emergency department: clinical and bispectral index scale comparison.丙泊酚与丙泊酚/氯胺酮用于急诊科简短疼痛操作的比较:临床与脑电双频指数比较
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2010 Dec;24(4):349-55. doi: 10.3109/15360288.2010.506503.
4
Propofol/alfentanil and propofol/ketamine procedural sedation in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: safety, efficacy and their correlation with pain neuromediator expression.儿童急性淋巴细胞白血病中异丙酚/阿芬太尼和异丙酚/氯胺酮的程序性镇静:安全性、疗效及其与疼痛神经递质表达的相关性。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2010 Mar;19(2):212-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2008.01006.x. Epub 2009 May 21.
5
Comparison of propofol versus propofol-ketamine combination for sedation during spinal anesthesia in children: randomized clinical trial of efficacy and safety.丙泊酚与丙泊酚 - 氯胺酮联合用药用于小儿脊髓麻醉期间镇静的比较:疗效与安全性的随机临床试验
Paediatr Anaesth. 2010 May;20(5):439-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2010.03286.x. Epub 2010 Mar 11.
6
Low-dose ketamine in addition to propofol for procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department.在急诊科,除丙泊酚外,低剂量氯胺酮用于程序镇静和镇痛。
Ann Pharmacother. 2007 Mar;41(3):485-92. doi: 10.1345/aph.1H522. Epub 2007 Mar 6.
7
Randomized clinical trial of propofol versus ketamine for procedural sedation in the emergency department.异丙酚与氯胺酮用于急诊科操作镇静的随机临床试验。
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Jun;17(6):604-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00776.x.
8
Addition of ketamine to propofol for initiation of procedural anesthesia in children reduces propofol consumption and preserves hemodynamic stability.在儿童程序性麻醉诱导中,将氯胺酮添加到丙泊酚中可减少丙泊酚用量并维持血流动力学稳定。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008 Apr;52(4):561-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01584.x.
9
A randomized controlled trial on use of propofol alone versus propofol with midazolam, ketamine, and pentazocine "sedato-analgesic cocktail" for sedation during ERCP.一项关于在ERCP期间单独使用丙泊酚与使用丙泊酚加咪达唑仑、氯胺酮和喷他佐辛“镇静镇痛合剂”进行镇静的随机对照试验。
Endoscopy. 2007 Sep;39(9):807-12. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-966725.
10
A comparison of ketamine + midazolam to propofol for procedural sedation for lumbar puncture in pediatric oncology by nonanesthesiologists-a randomized comparative trial.非麻醉医师行小儿肿瘤科腰椎穿刺术时,氯胺酮+咪达唑仑与异丙酚用于镇静的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2018 Aug;65(8):e27108. doi: 10.1002/pbc.27108. Epub 2018 May 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Dexmedetomidine Versus Midazolam for Propofol Sparing in Procedural Sedation of Children With Leukemia: A Consecutive Case Series.右美托咪定与咪达唑仑用于白血病患儿程序性镇静中丙泊酚减量的连续病例系列研究
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2025 Sep;69(8):e70107. doi: 10.1111/aas.70107.
2
The Effects of Ketamine-Propofol and Remifentanil-Propofol Combinations on Integrated Pulmonary Index During Sedation in Gastrointestinal System Endoscopy.氯胺酮-丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼-丙泊酚组合对胃肠系统内镜检查镇静期间综合肺指数的影响。
Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul. 2024 Jun 28;58(2):189-196. doi: 10.14744/SEMB.2024.37043. eCollection 2024.
3
Delayed Adverse Events after Procedural Sedation in Pediatric Patients with Hematologic Malignancies.
儿童血液系统恶性肿瘤患者程序性镇静后延迟不良事件。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Sep 2;58(9):1208. doi: 10.3390/medicina58091208.
4
Ketamine-propofol (Ketofol) for procedural sedation and analgesia in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.氯胺酮-丙泊酚(Ketofol)用于儿童镇静和镇痛:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Emerg Med. 2020 Oct 8;20(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12873-020-00373-4.
5
Structure-Activity Relationships for the Anaesthetic and Analgaesic Properties of Aromatic Ring-Substituted Ketamine Esters.芳香环取代的氯胺酮酯的麻醉和镇痛性质的构效关系。
Molecules. 2020 Jun 26;25(12):2950. doi: 10.3390/molecules25122950.
6
Adjuvant lidocaine to a propofol-ketamine-based sedation regimen for bone marrow aspirates and biopsy in the pediatric population.在儿科人群中,将利多卡因作为依托咪酯-氯胺酮镇静方案的辅助药物,用于骨髓抽吸和活检。
Eur J Pediatr. 2021 Jan;180(1):73-80. doi: 10.1007/s00431-020-03713-5. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
7
Temozolomide and oral etoposide in children with recurrent malignant brain tumors.替莫唑胺与口服依托泊苷用于复发性儿童恶性脑肿瘤的治疗
Drugs Context. 2020 Jun 2;9. doi: 10.7573/dic.2020-3-1. eCollection 2020.
8
Moderate and deep sedation for non-invasive paediatric procedures in tertiary maternity and children's hospitals in China: a questionnaire survey from China.中国三级妇产儿童医院非侵入性儿科操作中中深度镇静的应用:一项来自中国的问卷调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jan 8;20(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4885-4.
9
Reducing pain in children with cancer: Methodology for the development of a clinical practice guideline.减轻癌症儿童的疼痛:临床实践指南制定的方法学。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2019 Jun;66(6):e27698. doi: 10.1002/pbc.27698. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
10
Comparison between chloral hydrate and propofol-ketamine as sedation regimens for pediatric auditory brainstem response testing.比较水合氯醛与丙泊酚-氯胺酮在儿科听觉脑干反应测试中的镇静效果。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Jan-Feb;85(1):32-36. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2017.10.003. Epub 2017 Oct 28.