• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

种植体支持的螺丝固位三单位固定桥修复中基台位置的影响。

Effect of engaging abutment position in implant-borne, screw-retained three-unit fixed cantilevered prostheses.

机构信息

Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Division of Prosthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Bronx, NY 10467, USA.

出版信息

J Prosthodont. 2011 Jul;20(5):348-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00714.x. Epub 2011 May 17.

DOI:10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00714.x
PMID:21585587
Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate the effects of internally connected engaging component position in screw-retained fixed cantilevered prostheses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-one three-unit fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) were cast in high-palladium alloy in three groups. In group A, engaging components were incorporated into the units away from the cantilevered segment; proximal units received nonengaging components. In group B, these positions were reversed. Control specimens were fabricated using all nonengaging components. Specimens were attached to internally connected 3.5 (diameter) × 13 mm (length) implants, torqued to 32 Ncm, and embedded into epoxy resin. Specimens were tested in cyclic fatigue with a 2 Hz sine wave and 0.1 min/max load ratio. Load amplitude started at 1.8 N and increased by 1.8 N every 60 cycles until fracture. Log-rank statistic, ANOVA, Spearman's correlation, and LIFETEST procedures were used to evaluate level of statistical significance within the results.

RESULTS

In the control group, the mean number of cycles to fracture was 31,205 ± 2639. Mean axial force at fracture was 932 ± 78 N. In group A, these numbers were 38,160 ± 4292 and 1138 ± 128 N, and in group B, 31,810 ± 3408 and 949 ± 101 N. Statistical significance levels for number of cycles to fracture were: Control versus group A, p = 0.0117, and groups A versus B, p = 0.0156 (statistically significant). Control versus group B, p = 0.357 (not statistically significant). Log-rank statistic for the survival curves is greater than would be expected by chance; there was a statistically significant difference between survival curves (p = 0.012). The location and mode of failure were noteworthy (always in the abutment screw).

CONCLUSIONS

The position of the engaging component had significant effects on the results. Within the limitations of this investigation, it can be concluded that using an engaging abutment in a screw-retained fixed cantilevered FDP provides a mechanical advantage, and engaging the implant furthest from the cantilever when designing a screw-retained cantilever FDP increased resistance to fracture of the distal abutment screw.

摘要

目的

研究螺丝固位式固定单端桥中内部连接的嵌合部件位置的影响。

材料与方法

将 21 个三单位固定义齿(FDP)铸造成高钯合金,分为三组。在 A 组中,嵌合部件被纳入远离悬臂段的单位;近位单位接收非嵌合部件。在 B 组中,这些位置相反。使用所有非嵌合部件制造对照标本。将标本附着到内部连接的 3.5(直径)×13mm(长度)种植体上,以 32Ncm 的扭矩拧紧,并嵌入到环氧树脂中。在循环疲劳试验中,使用 2Hz 正弦波和 0.1min/max 负载比对标本进行测试。负载幅度从 1.8N 开始,每隔 60 个循环增加 1.8N,直到断裂。对数秩检验、方差分析、Spearman 相关和 LIFETEST 程序用于评估结果中的统计显著性水平。

结果

在对照组中,断裂的平均循环次数为 31205±2639。断裂时的平均轴向力为 932±78N。在 A 组中,这些数字分别为 38160±4292 和 1138±128N,在 B 组中,这些数字分别为 31810±3408 和 949±101N。断裂循环次数的统计显著性水平为:对照组与 A 组,p=0.0117,A 组与 B 组,p=0.0156(具有统计学意义)。对照组与 B 组,p=0.357(无统计学意义)。生存曲线的对数秩检验大于随机预期;生存曲线之间存在显著差异(p=0.012)。失效的位置和模式值得注意(总是在基牙螺丝上)。

结论

嵌合部件的位置对结果有显著影响。在本研究的限制范围内,可以得出结论,在螺丝固位式固定单端桥中使用嵌合基牙提供了机械优势,并且在设计螺丝固位式悬臂 FDP 时,将最远离悬臂的种植体嵌合,可以增加远侧基牙螺丝断裂的抵抗力。

相似文献

1
Effect of engaging abutment position in implant-borne, screw-retained three-unit fixed cantilevered prostheses.种植体支持的螺丝固位三单位固定桥修复中基台位置的影响。
J Prosthodont. 2011 Jul;20(5):348-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00714.x. Epub 2011 May 17.
2
In vitro evaluation of reverse torque value of abutment screw and marginal opening in a screw- and cement-retained implant fixed partial denture design.体外评估螺丝固位和粘结固位种植体固定修复体基台螺丝的反向扭矩值和边缘间隙。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Nov-Dec;24(6):1061-7.
3
Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface: joint opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants.牙种植体-基台界面的动态疲劳特性:大直径与标准直径六面体型种植体的关节开口情况
J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Jun;85(6):599-607. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2001.115250.
4
In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections.体外研究连接类型对内连接和外连接氧化锆基台的骨折负荷的影响。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Sep-Oct;24(5):850-8.
5
The Effects of a Vertical Compressive Cyclic Load on Abutment Screws and the Stability of the Prosthesis in Nonengaging and Partially Engaging Abutments in a Screw-Retained Splinted Fixed Dental Prosthesis.垂直压缩循环荷载对非固位和部分固位螺丝固位夹板式固定义齿基牙螺丝和修复体稳定性的影响。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2022 May-Jun;37(3):571-578. doi: 10.11607/jomi.9542.
6
The effects of loading on the preload and dimensions of the abutment screw for a 3-unit cantilever-fixed prosthesis design.加载对 3 单位悬臂固定修复体设计的基台螺丝的预紧力和尺寸的影响。
Implant Dent. 2013 Aug;22(4):414-21. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e31829c227a.
7
In vitro vertical misfit evaluation of cast frameworks for cement-retained implant-supported partial prostheses.用于粘结固位种植体支持的局部义齿的铸造支架体外垂直不匹配评估。
J Dent. 2009 Jan;37(1):52-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.09.007. Epub 2008 Oct 31.
8
Effect of implant connection and restoration design (screwed vs. cemented) in reliability and failure modes of anterior crowns.种植体连接方式及修复设计(螺丝固位与粘结固位)对前牙冠修复体可靠性及失败模式的影响
Eur J Oral Sci. 2011 Aug;119(4):323-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2011.00837.x.
9
Fracture resistance of titanium and zirconia abutments: an in vitro study.钛和氧化锆基台的抗折能力:一项体外研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2013 May;109(5):304-12. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60306-6.
10
Load fatigue performance of implant-ceramic abutment combinations.种植体-陶瓷基台组合的负载疲劳性能。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Jul-Aug;24(4):636-46.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence of Digital Manufacturing and Abutment Design on Full-Arch Implant Prostheses-An In Vitro Study.数字化制造与基台设计对全牙弓种植修复体的影响——一项体外研究
Materials (Basel). 2025 Jul 29;18(15):3543. doi: 10.3390/ma18153543.
2
Comparative Biomechanical Evaluation of Novel Screwless Retained Dental Implant Prosthesis: A 3D Finite Element Analysis.新型无螺丝固定式牙种植修复体的生物力学比较评估:三维有限元分析
J Funct Biomater. 2025 Jan 22;16(2):39. doi: 10.3390/jfb16020039.
3
Impact of type and position of abutment connection on microstrain distribution: an study.
基台连接类型和位置对微应变分布的影响:一项研究。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2024 Oct;16(5):290-301. doi: 10.4047/jap.2024.16.5.290. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
4
Dental Restorations.牙齿修复体
Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Jul 10;10(7):820. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10070820.
5
Evaluation of the dislodgement force of splinted restorations with engaging conical abutments over multiple nonparallel implants (in-vitro study).评估带有锥形邻接体的夹板修复体在多个非平行种植体上的脱位力(体外研究)。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 May 17;23(1):300. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-02958-4.
6
Finite Element Analysis of a New Non-Engaging Abutment System for Three-Unit Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses.用于三单位种植体支持固定义齿的新型非啮合基台系统的有限元分析
Bioengineering (Basel). 2022 Sep 20;9(10):483. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9100483.
7
Fatigue Resistance of Cast-on Implant Abutment Fabricated with Three Different Alloys.三种不同合金制成的铸造式种植体基台的抗疲劳性能
Eur J Dent. 2023 Feb;17(1):62-69. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1742124. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
8
Finite Element Analysis of Dental Implants with Zirconia Crown Restorations: Conventional Cement-Retained vs. Cementless Screw-Retained.氧化锆冠修复的牙种植体的有限元分析:传统水泥固位与无水泥螺钉固位对比
Materials (Basel). 2021 May 19;14(10):2666. doi: 10.3390/ma14102666.