• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医学文献中的撤稿:有多少有缺陷的研究将患者置于风险之中?

Retractions in the medical literature: how many patients are put at risk by flawed research?

机构信息

MediCC, Medical Communications Consultants, LLC, 103 Van Doren Place, Chapel Hill, NC 27517, USA.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2011 Nov;37(11):688-92. doi: 10.1136/jme.2011.043133. Epub 2011 May 17.

DOI:10.1136/jme.2011.043133
PMID:21586404
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical papers so flawed that they are eventually retracted may put patients at risk. Patient risk could arise in a retracted primary study or in any secondary study that draws ideas or inspiration from a primary study.

METHODS

To determine how many patients were put at risk, we evaluated 788 retracted English-language papers published from 2000 to 2010, describing new research with humans or freshly derived human material. These primary papers-together with all secondary studies citing them-were evaluated using ISI Web of Knowledge. Excluded from study were 468 basic science papers not studying fresh human material; 88 reviews presenting older data; 22 case reports; 7 papers retracted for journal error and 23 papers unavailable on Web of Knowledge. Overall, 180 retracted primary papers (22.8%) met the inclusion criteria. Subjects enrolled and patients treated in 180 primary studies and 851 secondary studies were combined.

RESULTS

Retracted papers were cited over 5000 times, with 93% of citations being research related, suggesting that ideas promulgated in retracted papers can influence subsequent research. Over 28 000 subjects were enrolled-and 9189 patients were treated-in 180 retracted primary studies. Over 400 000 subjects were enrolled-and 70 501 patients were treated-in 851 secondary studies which cited a retracted paper. Papers retracted for fraud (n=70) treated more patients per study (p<0.01) than papers retracted for error (n=110).

CONCLUSIONS

Many patients are put at risk by retracted studies. These are conservative estimates, as only patients enrolled in published clinical studies were tallied.

摘要

背景

有缺陷而最终被撤回的临床论文可能使患者面临风险。这种风险可能来自被撤回的原始研究,也可能来自从原始研究中汲取创意或灵感的任何二次研究。

方法

为了确定有多少患者面临风险,我们评估了 2000 年至 2010 年期间发表的 788 篇撤回的英文临床论文,这些论文描述了新的人体研究或利用新获取的人体材料开展的研究。这些原始论文以及所有引用它们的二次研究,都使用 ISI Web of Knowledge 进行了评估。研究排除了 468 篇不研究新鲜人体材料的基础科学论文、88 篇呈现旧数据的综述、22 篇病例报告、7 篇因期刊错误而被撤回的论文以及 23 篇无法在 Web of Knowledge 上获取的论文。总的来说,180 篇原始论文(22.8%)符合纳入标准。将 180 项原始研究和 851 项二次研究中纳入的受试者和接受治疗的患者合并在一起。

结果

撤回的论文被引用了 5000 多次,其中 93%的引用与研究有关,这表明撤回论文中提出的观点可能会影响后续研究。在 180 项撤回的原始研究中,有超过 28000 名受试者入组,9189 名患者接受了治疗。在引用了撤回论文的 851 项二次研究中,有超过 400000 名受试者入组,70501 名患者接受了治疗。因欺诈而被撤回的论文(n=70)每篇研究治疗的患者数量多于因错误而被撤回的论文(n=110)(p<0.01)。

结论

许多患者因撤回的研究而面临风险。这只是保守估计,因为只统计了发表的临床研究中纳入的患者。

相似文献

1
Retractions in the medical literature: how many patients are put at risk by flawed research?医学文献中的撤稿:有多少有缺陷的研究将患者置于风险之中?
J Med Ethics. 2011 Nov;37(11):688-92. doi: 10.1136/jme.2011.043133. Epub 2011 May 17.
2
Retractions in the medical literature: how can patients be protected from risk?医学文献中的撤稿:如何保护患者免受风险?
J Med Ethics. 2012 Apr;38(4):228-32. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100184. Epub 2011 Dec 2.
3
Misinformation in the medical literature: what role do error and fraud play?医学文献中的错误信息:错误和欺诈扮演了什么角色?
J Med Ethics. 2011 Aug;37(8):498-503. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.041830. Epub 2011 Feb 22.
4
Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing?科学文献中的撤稿:研究造假的发生率在增加吗?
J Med Ethics. 2011 Apr;37(4):249-53. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.040923. Epub 2010 Dec 24.
5
Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud?科学文献中的撤稿:作者是否故意从事研究欺诈?
J Med Ethics. 2011 Feb;37(2):113-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.038125. Epub 2010 Nov 15.
6
Publication misconduct and plagiarism retractions: a systematic, retrospective study.发表不当行为和抄袭撤稿:一项系统的、回顾性研究。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 Oct;28(10):1575-83. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2012.728131. Epub 2012 Oct 9.
7
Japanese doctor is heading for record number of retracted research papers.日本医生的撤稿研究论文数量正朝着创纪录的方向发展。
BMJ. 2012 Jul 4;345:e4596. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e4596.
8
Retracted publications in the drug literature.药物文献中的已撤回出版物。
Pharmacotherapy. 2012 Jul;32(7):586-95. doi: 10.1002/j.1875-9114.2012.01100.x. Epub 2012 May 11.
9
Characteristics of retractions related to faked peer reviews: an overview.与伪造同行评审相关的撤稿特征概述
Postgrad Med J. 2017 Aug;93(1102):499-503. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2016-133969. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
10
Retracted publications and their citation in dental literature: A systematic review.撤稿文献及其在牙科学文献中的引用:系统评价。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2020 Aug;6(4):383-390. doi: 10.1002/cre2.292. Epub 2020 Mar 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Dux Is Dispensable for Skeletal Muscle Regeneration: A Study Inspired by a "Red Flagged" Publication and Editorial Oversight.双胸蛋白对骨骼肌再生并非不可或缺:一项受“警示”出版物和编辑疏忽启发的研究
Cells. 2025 May 12;14(10):695. doi: 10.3390/cells14100695.
2
Retracted articles in scientific literature: A bibliometric analysis from 2003 to 2022 using the Web of Science.科学文献中的撤稿文章:2003年至2022年使用Web of Science进行的文献计量分析。
Heliyon. 2024 Sep 26;10(20):e38620. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38620. eCollection 2024 Oct 30.
3
A systematic review of ENT retractions.
耳鼻喉科手术牵拉的系统评价。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 Feb;282(2):1041-1048. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08980-8. Epub 2024 Oct 14.
4
Characteristics of retracted articles in ophthalmology.眼科撤稿文章的特征。
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 30;10(15):e35460. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35460. eCollection 2024 Aug 15.
5
Addressing researcher fraud: retrospective, real-time, and preventive strategies-including legal points and data management that prevents fraud.应对研究人员欺诈行为:回顾性、实时性及预防性策略——包括预防欺诈的法律要点和数据管理。
Front Res Metr Anal. 2024 Jun 27;9:1397649. doi: 10.3389/frma.2024.1397649. eCollection 2024.
6
Research integrity guidelines in the academic environment: The context of Brazilian institutions with retracted publications in health and life sciences.学术环境中的研究诚信指南:巴西机构在健康与生命科学领域撤回出版物的背景情况。
Front Res Metr Anal. 2022 Oct 28;7:991836. doi: 10.3389/frma.2022.991836. eCollection 2022.
7
Reducing the Inadvertent Spread of Retracted Science: recommendations from the RISRS report.减少撤回科学文献的意外传播:RISRS报告的建议
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2022 Sep 19;7(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s41073-022-00125-x.
8
The Citation Cloud of a biomedical article: a free, public, web-based tool enabling citation analysis.生物医学文章的引文云:一个免费的、公共的、基于网络的工具,实现引文分析。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2022 Jan 1;110(1):103-108. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2022.1117.
9
Sharing of retracted COVID-19 articles: an altmetric study.撤回的 COVID-19 文章共享:一项计量研究。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2022 Jan 1;110(1):97-102. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2022.1269.
10
Retracted publications in pharmacy systematic reviews.撤回的药学系统评价文献。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2022 Jan 1;110(1):47-55. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2022.1280.