Hepatology Unit, Gastroenterology Service, Virgen de la Victoria University Hospital Department of Medicine, University of Málaga, Spain.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011 Jul;66(7):1431-46. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr159. Epub 2011 May 17.
Antibiotics used by general practitioners frequently appear in adverse-event reports of drug-induced hepatotoxicity. Most cases are idiosyncratic (the adverse reaction cannot be predicted from the drug's pharmacological profile or from pre-clinical toxicology tests) and occur via an immunological reaction or in response to the presence of hepatotoxic metabolites. With the exception of trovafloxacin and telithromycin (now severely restricted), hepatotoxicity crude incidence remains globally low but variable. Thus, amoxicillin/clavulanate and co-trimoxazole, as well as flucloxacillin, cause hepatotoxic reactions at rates that make them visible in general practice (cases are often isolated, may have a delayed onset, sometimes appear only after cessation of therapy and can produce an array of hepatic lesions that mirror hepatobiliary disease, making causality often difficult to establish). Conversely, hepatotoxic reactions related to macrolides, tetracyclines and fluoroquinolones (in that order, from high to low) are much rarer, and are identifiable only through large-scale studies or worldwide pharmacovigilance reporting. For antibiotics specifically used for tuberculosis, adverse effects range from asymptomatic increases in liver enzymes to acute hepatitis and fulminant hepatic failure. Yet, it is difficult to single out individual drugs, as treatment always entails associations. Patients at risk are mainly those with previous experience of hepatotoxic reaction to antibiotics, the aged or those with impaired hepatic function in the absence of close monitoring, making it important to carefully balance potential risks with expected benefits in primary care. Pharmacogenetic testing using the new genome-wide association studies approach holds promise for better understanding the mechanism(s) underlying hepatotoxicity.
在药物性肝毒性的不良事件报告中,经常出现普通医生使用的抗生素。大多数病例是特发性的(不良反应不能从药物的药理学特征或临床前毒理学测试中预测),是通过免疫反应或对肝毒性代谢物的反应发生的。除了曲伐沙星和替尔霉素(现在受到严格限制)之外,全球范围内肝毒性的总发生率仍然较低,但存在差异。因此,阿莫西林/克拉维酸和复方磺胺甲噁唑以及氟氯西林引起肝毒性反应的发生率使其在普通实践中可见(病例通常是孤立的,可能有延迟发作,有时仅在停止治疗后出现,并且可以产生一系列类似于肝胆疾病的肝损伤,使因果关系常常难以确定)。相反,与大环内酯类、四环素类和氟喹诺酮类(按顺序从高到低)相关的肝毒性反应要罕见得多,只有通过大规模研究或全球药物警戒报告才能识别。对于专门用于治疗结核病的抗生素,不良反应从无症状的肝酶升高到急性肝炎和暴发性肝衰竭不等。然而,很难单独确定个别药物,因为治疗总是需要联合用药。有风险的患者主要是那些以前有过抗生素肝毒性反应的患者、老年人或在缺乏密切监测的情况下肝功能受损的患者,因此在初级保健中仔细权衡潜在风险与预期收益非常重要。使用新的全基因组关联研究方法进行药物遗传学检测有望更好地了解肝毒性的机制。