Suppr超能文献

血浆生物标志物谱因乳腺癌亚型而异,但 RANTES 始终增加。

Plasma biomarker profiles differ depending on breast cancer subtype but RANTES is consistently increased.

机构信息

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99354, USA.

出版信息

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 Jul;20(7):1543-51. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-1248. Epub 2011 May 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Current biomarkers for breast cancer have little potential for detection. We determined whether breast cancer subtypes influence circulating protein biomarkers.

METHODS

A sandwich ELISA microarray platform was used to evaluate 23 candidate biomarkers in plasma samples that were obtained from subjects with either benign breast disease or invasive breast cancer. All plasma samples were collected at the time of biopsy, after a referral due to a suspicious screen (e.g., mammography). Cancer samples were evaluated on the basis of breast cancer subtypes, as defined by the HER2 and estrogen receptor statuses.

RESULTS

Ten proteins were statistically altered in at least one breast cancer subtype, including four epidermal growth factor receptor ligands, two matrix metalloproteases, two cytokines, and two angiogenic factors. Only one cytokine, RANTES, was significantly increased (P < 0.01 for each analysis) in all four subtypes, with areas under the curve (AUC) for receiver operating characteristic values that ranged from 0.76 to 0.82, depending on cancer subtype. The best AUC values were observed for analyses that combined data from multiple biomarkers, with values ranging from 0.70 to 0.99, depending on the cancer subtype. Although the results for RANTES are consistent with previous publications, the multi-assay results need to be validated in independent sample sets.

CONCLUSIONS

Different breast cancer subtypes produce distinct biomarker profiles, and circulating protein biomarkers have potential to differentiate between true- and false-positive screens for breast cancer.

IMPACT

Subtype-specific biomarker panels may be useful for detecting breast cancer or as an adjunct assay to improve the accuracy of current screening methods.

摘要

背景

目前用于乳腺癌的生物标志物检测潜力有限。我们确定了乳腺癌亚型是否会影响循环蛋白生物标志物。

方法

使用夹心 ELISA 微阵列平台评估了来自良性乳腺疾病或浸润性乳腺癌患者的血浆样本中的 23 种候选生物标志物。所有血浆样本均在活检时采集,在因可疑筛查(例如乳房 X 线照相术)而转诊后采集。根据 HER2 和雌激素受体状态评估癌症样本的乳腺癌亚型。

结果

至少有一种乳腺癌亚型中,有 10 种蛋白质在统计学上发生改变,包括四种表皮生长因子受体配体、两种基质金属蛋白酶、两种细胞因子和两种血管生成因子。只有一种细胞因子 RANTES 在所有四种亚型中均显著增加(每种分析的 P<0.01),受体操作特性曲线下面积(AUC)的 AUC 值范围为 0.76 至 0.82,具体取决于癌症亚型。通过组合来自多个生物标志物的数据进行分析,获得了最佳的 AUC 值,范围为 0.70 至 0.99,具体取决于癌症亚型。尽管 RANTES 的结果与先前的出版物一致,但多分析结果需要在独立的样本集中进行验证。

结论

不同的乳腺癌亚型产生不同的生物标志物谱,循环蛋白生物标志物具有区分乳腺癌真阳性和假阳性筛查的潜力。

影响

特定于亚型的生物标志物面板可能有助于检测乳腺癌,或作为辅助检测方法,以提高当前筛查方法的准确性。

相似文献

1
Plasma biomarker profiles differ depending on breast cancer subtype but RANTES is consistently increased.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 Jul;20(7):1543-51. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-1248. Epub 2011 May 17.
3
Oxidatively modified proteins as plasma biomarkers in breast cancer.
Cancer Biomark. 2013;13(3):193-200. doi: 10.3233/CBM-130349.
4
Feasibility of risk assessment for breast cancer molecular subtypes.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Nov;208(1):103-110. doi: 10.1007/s10549-024-07404-9. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
10

引用本文的文献

2
Immunity and Breast Cancer: Focus on Eosinophils.
Biomedicines. 2021 Aug 26;9(9):1087. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9091087.
3
Volatile Anesthetics Regulate Anti-Cancer Relevant Signaling.
Front Oncol. 2021 Feb 26;11:610514. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.610514. eCollection 2021.
4
Research Trends and Regulation of CCL5 in Prostate Cancer.
Onco Targets Ther. 2021 Feb 25;14:1417-1427. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S279189. eCollection 2021.
5
PUM1 and RNase P genes as potential cell-free DNA markers in breast cancer.
J Clin Lab Anal. 2021 Apr;35(4):e23720. doi: 10.1002/jcla.23720. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
6
Osteonecrosis of the Jaw Beyond Bisphosphonates: Are There Any Unknown Local Risk Factors?
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2021 Jan 19;13:21-37. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S288603. eCollection 2021.
7
Dysregulated EGFR pathway in serum in early-stage breast cancer patients: A case control study.
Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 21;10(1):6714. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-63375-z.
8
Chemokines and chemokine receptors: A new strategy for breast cancer therapy.
Cancer Med. 2020 Jun;9(11):3786-3799. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3014. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
9
Inhibition of the CCL5/CCR5 Axis against the Progression of Gastric Cancer.
Int J Mol Sci. 2018 May 16;19(5):1477. doi: 10.3390/ijms19051477.
10
Exposure to 60% oxygen promotes migration and upregulates angiogenesis factor secretion in breast cancer cells.
Med Gas Res. 2018 Jan 22;7(4):226-235. doi: 10.4103/2045-9912.222446. eCollection 2017 Oct-Dec.

本文引用的文献

3
ProMAT calibrator: A tool for reducing experimental bias in antibody microarrays.
J Proteome Res. 2009 Aug;8(8):3937-43. doi: 10.1021/pr900247n.
4
Clinical proteomics in breast cancer: a review.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009 Jul;116(1):17-29. doi: 10.1007/s10549-008-0263-3. Epub 2008 Dec 11.
5
Investigating the correspondence between transcriptomic and proteomic expression profiles using coupled cluster models.
Bioinformatics. 2008 Dec 15;24(24):2894-900. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn553. Epub 2008 Oct 30.
6
Biological processes associated with breast cancer clinical outcome depend on the molecular subtypes.
Clin Cancer Res. 2008 Aug 15;14(16):5158-65. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4756.
8
The inflammatory chemokines CCL2 and CCL5 in breast cancer.
Cancer Lett. 2008 Aug 28;267(2):271-85. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2008.03.018. Epub 2008 Apr 24.
9
Protein profiling of human breast tumor cells identifies novel biomarkers associated with molecular subtypes.
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2008 Aug;7(8):1420-33. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M700487-MCP200. Epub 2008 Apr 20.
10
Development and validation of sandwich ELISA microarrays with minimal assay interference.
J Proteome Res. 2008 Jun;7(6):2406-14. doi: 10.1021/pr700822t. Epub 2008 Apr 19.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验