Centre for Theoretical and Computational Chemistry and Department of Chemistry, University of Tromsø, N-9037 Tromsø, Norway.
Chemistry. 2011 May 27;17(23):6348-58. doi: 10.1002/chem.201003578. Epub 2011 May 17.
Nitrite has recently been recognized as a storage form of NO in blood and as playing a key role in hypoxic vasodilation. The nitrite ion is readily reduced to NO by hemoglobin in red blood cells, which, as it happens, also presents a conundrum. Given NO's enormous affinity for ferrous heme, a key question concerns how it escapes capture by hemoglobin as it diffuses out of the red cells and to the endothelium, where vasodilation takes place. Dinitrogen trioxide (N(2)O(3)) has been proposed as a vehicle that transports NO to the endothelium, where it dissociates to NO and NO(2). Although N(2)O(3) formation might be readily explained by the reaction Hb-Fe(3+)+NO(2)(-)+NO⇌Hb-Fe(2+)+N(2)O(3), the exact manner in which methemoglobin (Hb-Fe(3+)), nitrite and NO interact with one another is unclear. Both an "Hb-Fe(3+)-NO(2)(-)+NO" pathway and an "Hb-Fe(3+)-NO+NO(2)(-) " pathway have been proposed. Neither pathway has been established experimentally. Nor has there been any attempt until now to theoretically model N(2)O(3) formation, the so-called nitrite anhydrase reaction. Both pathways have been examined here in a detailed density functional theory (DFT, B3LYP/TZP) study and both have been found to be feasible based on energetics criteria. Modeling the "Hb-Fe(3+)-NO(2)(-)+NO" pathway proved complex. Not only are multiple linkage-isomeric (N- and O-coordinated) structures conceivable for methemoglobin-nitrite, multiple isomeric forms are also possible for N(2)O(3) (the lowest-energy state has an N-N-bonded nitronitrosyl structure, O(2)N-NO). We considered multiple spin states of methemoglobin-nitrite as well as ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic coupling of the Fe(3+) and NO spins. Together, the isomerism and spin variables result in a diabolically complex combinatorial space of reaction pathways. Fortunately, transition states could be successfully calculated for the vast majority of these reaction channels, both M(S)=0 and M(S)=1. For a six-coordinate Fe(3+)-O-nitrito starting geometry, which is plausible for methemoglobin-nitrite, we found that N(2)O(3) formation entails barriers of about 17-20 kcal mol(-1) , which is reasonable for a physiologically relevant reaction. For the "Hb-Fe(3+) -NO+NO(2) (-) " pathway, which was also found to be energetically reasonable, our calculations indicate a two-step mechanism. The first step involves transfer of an electron from NO(2)(-) to the Fe(3+)-heme-NO center ({FeNO}(6)) , resulting in formation of nitrogen dioxide and an Fe(2+)-heme-NO center ({FeNO}(7)). Subsequent formation of N(2)O(3) entails a barrier of only 8.1 kcal mol(-1) . From an energetics point of view, the nitrite anhydrase reaction thus is a reasonable proposition. Although it is tempting to interpret our results as favoring the "{FeNO}(6)+NO(2)(-) " pathway over the "Fe(3+)-nitrite+NO" pathway, both pathways should be considered energetically reasonable for a biological reaction and it seems inadvisable to favor a unique reaction channel based solely on quantum chemical modeling.
亚硝酸盐最近被认为是血液中一氧化氮的储存形式,并在缺氧性血管舒张中发挥关键作用。亚硝酸盐离子很容易被红细胞中的血红蛋白还原为一氧化氮,而血红蛋白也带来了一个难题。考虑到一氧化氮与亚铁血红素的巨大亲和力,一个关键问题是,当它从红细胞扩散到内皮细胞并发生血管舒张时,它是如何逃脱与血红蛋白结合的。三氧化二氮(N2O3)已被提议作为一种将一氧化氮输送到内皮细胞的载体,在那里它解离为一氧化氮和二氧化氮。尽管 N2O3 的形成可能很容易通过反应 Hb-Fe(3+)+NO2(-)+NO ⇌Hb-Fe(2+)+N2O3 来解释,但血红蛋白(Hb-Fe(3+))、亚硝酸盐和一氧化氮之间的确切相互作用方式尚不清楚。已经提出了一种“Hb-Fe(3+)-NO2(-)+NO”途径和一种“Hb-Fe(3+)-NO+NO2(-)”途径。这两种途径都没有通过实验来证明。直到现在,也没有人试图从理论上模拟 N2O3 的形成,即所谓的亚硝酸盐脱水酶反应。在详细的密度泛函理论(DFT,B3LYP/TZP)研究中,我们对这两种途径都进行了研究,根据能量学标准,这两种途径都是可行的。对“Hb-Fe(3+)-NO2(-)+NO”途径进行建模证明很复杂。不仅血红蛋白-亚硝酸盐的配位异构体(N 和 O 配位)结构可以想象,而且 N2O3 的异构形式也可能存在(最低能量状态具有 N-N 键合的硝基亚硝酰基结构,O2N-NO)。我们考虑了血红蛋白-亚硝酸盐的多种自旋态以及 Fe(3+)和 NO 自旋的铁磁和反铁磁耦合。异构体和自旋变量的组合导致反应途径的组合空间极其复杂。幸运的是,我们成功地计算了绝大多数这些反应通道的过渡态,无论是 M(S)=0 还是 M(S)=1。对于六配位的 Fe(3+)-O-亚硝酰基起始几何形状,这对于血红蛋白-亚硝酸盐是合理的,我们发现 N2O3 的形成需要约 17-20 kcal mol(-1)的势垒,这对于生理相关的反应是合理的。对于“Hb-Fe(3+)-NO+NO2(-)”途径,我们也发现其能量合理,我们的计算表明该途径是两步机制。第一步涉及将电子从 NO2(-)转移到 Fe(3+)-血红素-NO 中心({FeNO}(6)),导致形成二氧化氮和 Fe(2+)-血红素-NO 中心({FeNO}(7))。随后 N2O3 的形成只需要 8.1 kcal mol(-1)的势垒。从能量学的角度来看,亚硝酸盐脱水酶反应因此是一个合理的提议。尽管我们的结果很容易被解释为有利于“{FeNO}(6)+NO2(-)”途径而不是“Fe(3+)-亚硝酸盐+NO”途径,但对于生物反应,这两种途径都应该被认为是合理的,并且仅基于量子化学建模来支持独特的反应通道似乎是不明智的。