Department of Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University Chicago, Illinois, USA.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Jun;33(6):1517-25. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22556.
To investigate the feasibility of combining the inner-volume-imaging (IVI) technique with single-shot diffusion-weighted (DW) spin-echo echo-planar imaging (SE-EPI) and DW-SPLICE (split acquisition of fast spin-echo) sequences for renal DW imaging.
Renal DWI was performed in 10 healthy volunteers using single-shot DW-SE-EPI, DW-SPLICE, targeted-DW-SE-EPI, and targeted-DW-SPLICE. We compared the quantitative diffusion measurement accuracy and image quality of these targeted-DW-SE-EPI and targeted DW-SPLICE methods with conventional full field of view (FOV) DW-SE-EPI and DW-SPLICE measurements in phantoms and normal volunteers.
Compared with full FOV DW-SE-EPI and DW-SPLICE methods, targeted-DW-SE-EPI and targeted-DW-SPLICE approaches produced images of superior overall quality with fewer artifacts, less distortion, and reduced spatial blurring in both phantom and volunteer studies. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values measured with each of the four methods were similar and in agreement with previously published data. There were no statistically significant differences between the ADC values and intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) measurements in the kidney cortex and medulla using single-shot DW-SE-EPI, targeted-DW-EPI, and targeted-DW-SPLICE (P > 0.05).
Compared with full-FOV DWI methods, targeted-DW-SE-EPI and targeted-DW-SPLICE techniques reduced image distortion and artifacts observed in the single-shot DW-SE-EPI images, reduced blurring in DW-SPLICE images, and produced comparable quantitative DW and IVIM measurements to those produced with conventional full-FOV approaches.
探讨将内腔成像(IVI)技术与单次激发扩散加权(DW)自旋回波平面成像(SE-EPI)和 DW-SPLICE(快速自旋回波分离采集)序列相结合进行肾脏 DW 成像的可行性。
对 10 名健康志愿者进行单次激发 DW-SE-EPI、DW-SPLICE、靶向 DW-SE-EPI 和靶向 DW-SPLICE 肾 DWI 检查。我们比较了这些靶向 DW-SE-EPI 和靶向 DW-SPLICE 方法与常规全视野(FOV)DW-SE-EPI 和 DW-SPLICE 测量在体模和正常志愿者中的定量扩散测量准确性和图像质量。
与全 FOV DW-SE-EPI 和 DW-SPLICE 方法相比,靶向 DW-SE-EPI 和靶向 DW-SPLICE 方法在体模和志愿者研究中产生的图像整体质量更好,伪影更少,失真更少,空间模糊度降低。四种方法测量的表观扩散系数(ADC)值相似,与之前发表的数据一致。使用单次激发 DW-SE-EPI、靶向 DW-EPI 和靶向 DW-SPLICE 测量肾脏皮质和髓质时,ADC 值和各向异性分数(IVIM)测量值之间没有统计学差异(P>0.05)。
与全 FOV DWI 方法相比,靶向 DW-SE-EPI 和靶向 DW-SPLICE 技术减少了单次激发 DW-SE-EPI 图像中观察到的图像失真和伪影,减少了 DW-SPLICE 图像中的模糊,并产生了与传统全 FOV 方法相当的定量 DW 和 IVIM 测量值。