van der Hulst Hedda J, Braun Loes, Westerink Bram, Agrotis Georgios, Ter Beek Leon C, Tissier Renaud, Ahmadian Milad, Martens Roland M, Casselman Jan W, Beets-Tan Regina G H, van den Brekel Michiel W M, Castelijns Jonas A
From the Department of Radiology (H.J.v.d.H., L.B., B.W., G.A., M.A., R.G.H.B.-T., J.A.C.), Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology (H.J.v.d.H., R.G.H.B.-T.), University of Maastricht, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2025 Apr 2;46(4):774-783. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A8529.
DWI using single-shot echo-planar imaging (DWI-EPI) is susceptible to distortions around air-filled cavities and dental fillings, typical for the head and neck area. Non-EPI, split acquisition of fast spin-echo signals for diffusion imaging (DW-SPLICE) could reduce these distortions and enhance image quality, thereby potentially improving recurrence assessment in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the head and neck region. This study evaluated whether DW-SPLICE is a viable alternative to DWI-EPI through quantitative and qualitative analyses.
The DW-SPLICE sequence was incorporated into the standard 3T head and neck MRI protocol with DWI-EPI. Retrospective analysis was conducted on 2 subgroups: first benign or malignant lesions, and second, posttreatment SCC recurrence. In both subgroups, image quality and distortion were scored by 2 independent radiologists, blinded to the DWI technique and evaluated using mixed-effect linear models. Lesion ADC values were assessed with interclass correlation and Bland-Altman analyses. The delineation geometric similarity of DWI to T1-weighted postcontrast MRI was evaluated using the DSC before and after registration. Recurrence in posttreatment SCC scans was evaluated by the same 2 radiologists blinded to the DWI technique. Recurrence detection rates were then compared between DW-SPLICE and DWI-EPI using mixed logistic regression at 6 months and 1 year postscan follow-up data.
From August 2020 to January 2022, fifty-five benign or malignant lesion scans (55 patients) and 74 posttreatment SCC scans (66 patients) were analyzed. DW-SPLICE scored better on image quality and showed less overall distortion than DWI-EPI (0.04< < .001). There was high ADC measurement reliability (intraclsss correlation coefficient = 0.93, < .001), though a proportional bias was also observed (β = 0.11, = .03), indicating that the bias increases as ADC values increase. DW-SPLICE exhibited greater geometric similarity to T1WI with gadolinium contrast before registration (DSC 0.63 versus 0.47, < .001) and outperformed DWI-EPI by more accurately identifying recurrences after 1 year (OR = 0.96, = .05) but not after 6 months (OR = 0.72, = .13).
DW-SPLICE surpasses DWI-EPI on image distortion and quality and improves diagnostic reliability for detecting recurrent or residual SCC on 3T MRI of the head and neck. Consistent use of 1 method for follow-up is advised, because ADC values are not completely interchangeable. Integrating DW-SPLICE can significantly improve tumor assessments in clinical practice.
使用单次激发回波平面成像(DWI-EPI)的扩散加权成像(DWI)在充满空气的腔隙和牙科填充物周围容易出现畸变,这在头颈部区域很常见。非EPI的快速自旋回波信号分割采集用于扩散成像(DW-SPLICE)可以减少这些畸变并提高图像质量,从而有可能改善头颈部区域鳞状细胞癌(SCC)的复发评估。本研究通过定量和定性分析评估DW-SPLICE是否是DWI-EPI的可行替代方案。
将DW-SPLICE序列纳入带有DWI-EPI的标准3T头颈部MRI协议中。对两个亚组进行回顾性分析:第一组为良性或恶性病变,第二组为治疗后SCC复发。在两个亚组中,由2名独立的放射科医生对图像质量和畸变进行评分,他们对DWI技术不知情,并使用混合效应线性模型进行评估。使用组内相关分析和Bland-Altman分析评估病变的表观扩散系数(ADC)值。在配准前后使用Dice相似系数(DSC)评估DWI与T1加权增强后MRI的轮廓几何相似性。由这2名对DWI技术不知情的放射科医生评估治疗后SCC扫描中的复发情况。然后在扫描后6个月和1年的随访数据中,使用混合逻辑回归比较DW-SPLICE和DWI-EPI之间的复发检测率。
2020年8月至2022年1月,分析了55例良性或恶性病变扫描(55例患者)和74例治疗后SCC扫描(66例患者)。DW-SPLICE在图像质量方面评分更高,且总体畸变比DWI-EPI更少(P<0.04<P<0.001)。ADC测量具有较高的可靠性(组内相关系数=0.93,P<0.001),不过也观察到了比例偏差(β=0.11,P=0.03),表明偏差随着ADC值的增加而增大。在配准前,DW-SPLICE与钆增强T1WI表现出更大的几何相似性(DSC为0.63对0.47,P<0.001),并且在1年后通过更准确地识别复发情况优于DWI-EPI(比值比[OR]=0.96,P=0.05),但在6个月后并非如此(OR=0.72,P=0.13)。
DW-SPLICE在图像畸变和质量方面优于DWI-EPI,并提高了在头颈部3T MRI上检测复发或残留SCC的诊断可靠性。建议在随访中始终使用一种方法,因为ADC值并非完全可互换。在临床实践中整合DW-SPLICE可以显著改善肿瘤评估。