• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

某省级医院急性阑尾炎的阿尔瓦拉多评分

Alvarado score for the acute appendicitis in a provincial hospital.

作者信息

Limpawattanasiri Chairoek

机构信息

Division of Surgery, Chachoengsao Hospital, Chachoengsao, Thailand.

出版信息

J Med Assoc Thai. 2011 Apr;94(4):441-9.

PMID:21591529
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the accuracy of Alvarado Score in predicting acute appendicitis in Chachoengsao Hospital.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

The prospective study involved 1, 000 patients with suspected acute appendicitis. It was carried out between April 2008 and March 2010. The patients were given specific scores according to variables of Alvarado Scoring System. The signs, symptoms, laboratory values and pathology reports of each patient were collected and evaluated. The diagnosis was confirmed by operative findings and histopathological examination of specimens. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves of each indicator were also calculated.

RESULTS

Out of total 1,000 patients (407 males, 593 females), 838 underwent surgery (352 males, 486 females) and specimens of 715 patients (313 males, 402 females) were confirmed by histopathological examination, thus giving negative appendectomy rate of 14.7% (11.08% males, 17.28% females). The overall sensitivity of Alvarado Score was 87.41% and the specificity was 74.39%, while the positive predictive value was 83.7%. The area under the curve was 0.74.

CONCLUSION

Though the diagnosis of acute appendicitis remains mainly clinical evaluation, Alvarado Score can be recommended as a helpful tool for the admission criteria and further management in order to reduce unnecessary admission, morbidity and mortality, length of stay, and cost of treatment.

摘要

目的

评估阿尔瓦拉多评分在猜也奔府医院预测急性阑尾炎方面的准确性。

材料与方法

这项前瞻性研究纳入了1000例疑似急性阑尾炎患者。研究于2008年4月至2010年3月期间进行。根据阿尔瓦拉多评分系统的变量给患者赋予特定分数。收集并评估每位患者的体征、症状、实验室值和病理报告。通过手术所见和标本的组织病理学检查来确诊。还计算了每个指标的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值以及受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线。

结果

在总共1000例患者(407例男性,593例女性)中,838例接受了手术(352例男性,486例女性),715例患者(313例男性,402例女性)的标本经组织病理学检查确诊,因此阴性阑尾切除率为14.7%(男性为11.08%,女性为17.28%)。阿尔瓦拉多评分的总体敏感性为87.41%,特异性为74.39%,而阳性预测值为83.7%。曲线下面积为0.74。

结论

虽然急性阑尾炎的诊断仍主要依靠临床评估,但阿尔瓦拉多评分可作为入院标准和进一步管理的有用工具,以减少不必要的入院、发病率和死亡率、住院时间以及治疗费用。

相似文献

1
Alvarado score for the acute appendicitis in a provincial hospital.某省级医院急性阑尾炎的阿尔瓦拉多评分
J Med Assoc Thai. 2011 Apr;94(4):441-9.
2
Comparison of RIPASA and Alvarado scores for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.RIPASA 评分与 Alvarado 评分对急性阑尾炎诊断的比较。
Singapore Med J. 2011 May;52(5):340-5.
3
"Prospective evaluation of modified Alvarado score for diagnosis of acute appendicitis.改良阿瓦拉多评分对急性阑尾炎诊断的前瞻性评估。
J Indian Med Assoc. 2002 Dec;100(12):718; author reply 718.
4
Evaluation of the Alvarado score in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.阿尔瓦拉多评分在急性阑尾炎诊断中的评估
Trop Gastroenterol. 2004 Oct-Dec;25(4):184-6.
5
The accuracy of emergency medicine and surgical residents in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.急诊医学和外科住院医师在急性阑尾炎诊断中的准确性。
Am J Emerg Med. 2010 Sep;28(7):766-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2009.03.017. Epub 2010 Mar 25.
6
Appraisal of the modified Alvarado Score for acute appendicits in adults.改良阿尔瓦拉多评分法对成人急性阑尾炎的评估
Saudi Med J. 2004 Sep;25(9):1229-31.
7
Accuracy in diagnosis of acute appendicitis by comparing serum C-reactive protein measurements, Alvarado score and clinical impression of surgeons.通过比较血清C反应蛋白测量值、阿尔瓦拉多评分和外科医生的临床印象来诊断急性阑尾炎的准确性。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2004 Mar;87(3):296-303.
8
Development of the RIPASA score: a new appendicitis scoring system for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.RIPASA 评分的制定:一种用于诊断急性阑尾炎的新的阑尾炎评分系统。
Singapore Med J. 2010 Mar;51(3):220-5.
9
Alvarado scoring system in prediction of acute appendicitis.阿尔瓦拉多评分系统在急性阑尾炎预测中的应用
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2011 Dec;21(12):753-5.
10
External validation of Lintula score in Turkish acute appendicitis patients.林图拉评分在土耳其急性阑尾炎患者中的外部验证。
Int J Surg. 2012;10(1):25-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.11.006. Epub 2011 Nov 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic accuracy of Alvarado scoring system relative to histopathological diagnosis for acute appendicitis: A retrospective cohort study.阿尔瓦拉多评分系统相对于急性阑尾炎组织病理学诊断的诊断准确性:一项回顾性队列研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 Sep 2;81:104561. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104561. eCollection 2022 Sep.
2
Value of Alvarado scoring system in diagnosis of acute appendicitis.阿尔瓦拉多评分系统在急性阑尾炎诊断中的价值。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 Apr 19;77:103642. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103642. eCollection 2022 May.
3
Added value of graded compression ultrasound to the Alvarado score in cases of right iliac fossa pain.
在右下腹疼痛病例中,分级加压超声对阿尔瓦拉多评分的附加值。
Afr J Emerg Med. 2016 Sep;6(3):138-143. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2016.02.004. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
4
[Role of the Alvarado score in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis].阿尔瓦拉多评分在急性阑尾炎诊断中的作用
Pan Afr Med J. 2018 Jan 22;29:56. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2018.29.56.14011. eCollection 2018.
5
The Alvarado Score is accurate in pregnancy: a retrospective case-control study.Alvarado 评分在妊娠中准确:一项回顾性病例对照研究。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2019 Jun;45(3):411-416. doi: 10.1007/s00068-017-0855-x. Epub 2017 Nov 11.
6
How much Reliable Is Alvarado Scoring System in Reducing Negative Appendectomy?阿尔瓦拉多评分系统在减少阴性阑尾切除术中的可靠性如何?
Indian J Surg. 2017 Apr;79(2):106-110. doi: 10.1007/s12262-015-1433-2. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
7
Clinical Prediction Rules for Appendicitis in Adults: Which Is Best?成人阑尾炎的临床预测规则:哪一种最佳?
World J Surg. 2017 Jul;41(7):1769-1781. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-3926-6.
8
The RIPASA score is sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in a western population.RIPASA评分对于西方人群急性阑尾炎的诊断具有敏感性和特异性。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Apr;32(4):491-497. doi: 10.1007/s00384-016-2713-4. Epub 2016 Dec 15.
9
Accuracy of Surgeon's Intraoperation Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis, Compared with the Histopathology Results.外科医生对急性阑尾炎的术中诊断与组织病理学结果的准确性比较。
Bull Emerg Trauma. 2014 Jan;2(1):15-21.
10
The evaluation of the validity of Alvarado, Eskelinen, Lintula and Ohmann scoring systems in diagnosing acute appendicitis in children.阿尔瓦拉多、埃斯凯林恩、林图拉和奥曼评分系统在诊断儿童急性阑尾炎中的有效性评估。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2014 Mar;30(3):317-21. doi: 10.1007/s00383-014-3467-0.