• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿尔瓦拉多评分系统在减少阴性阑尾切除术中的可靠性如何?

How much Reliable Is Alvarado Scoring System in Reducing Negative Appendectomy?

作者信息

Tekeli Mehmet Tahsin, Ilhan Enver, Ureyen Orhan, Senlikci Abdullah, Yeldan Eyup, Ozturk Mucteba, Ustuner Mehmet Akif, Gokcelli Ugur, Dadali Emrah, Cengiz Fevzi, Yakan Savas

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Izmir Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.

出版信息

Indian J Surg. 2017 Apr;79(2):106-110. doi: 10.1007/s12262-015-1433-2. Epub 2016 Jan 11.

DOI:10.1007/s12262-015-1433-2
PMID:28442835
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5386934/
Abstract

There is still an ongoing debate, especially regarding early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Early surgery leads to inadequate evaluation of acute abdominal pain and negative appendectomy, whereas delayed surgery leads to appendicitis perforation complications. The diagnosis of this condition is considerably difficult, especially due to subtle early symptoms and clinical condition. The aim of the present study was to identify whether the Alvarado scoring system could reduce the incidence of negative appendectomy in patients who will undergo surgery for acute appendicitis. Patients who underwent surgery with acute appendicitis prediagnosis were retrospectively classified as negative appendectomies (group A) and positive appendectomies (group B) according to histological diagnosis. All groups were evaluated for age, gender, Alvarado scores, and parameters. Two hundred eighty-one patients were included in the study. Group A contained 71 (25.3 %) patients, and group B contained 210 (74.7 %) patients. There was a significant difference in WBC, left shift, rebound, and change of pain localization between the groups ( = 0.002,  < 0.001,  < 0.001, and  = 0.023, respectively). Alvarado scores were significantly different between the groups ( < 0.001). In logistic model examination, the major factor was the Alvarado score (7 or above) and the minor factor was spreading pain. The Alvarado scoring system can be used to reduce negative appendectomy in patients who will undergo surgery with acute appendicitis.

摘要

目前仍存在争议,尤其是在急性阑尾炎的早期诊断方面。早期手术会导致对急性腹痛评估不足以及阑尾切除阴性,而延迟手术则会导致阑尾炎穿孔并发症。这种疾病的诊断相当困难,特别是由于早期症状和临床情况较为隐匿。本研究的目的是确定阿尔瓦拉多评分系统是否可以降低将接受急性阑尾炎手术患者的阑尾切除阴性发生率。根据组织学诊断,对预先诊断为急性阑尾炎并接受手术的患者进行回顾性分类,分为阑尾切除阴性组(A组)和阑尾切除阳性组(B组)。对所有组进行年龄、性别、阿尔瓦拉多评分及各项参数评估。281例患者纳入本研究。A组有71例(25.3%)患者,B组有210例(74.7%)患者。两组之间白细胞计数、核左移、反跳痛及疼痛部位变化存在显著差异(分别为P = 0.002、P < 0.001、P < 0.001和P = 0.023)。两组之间阿尔瓦拉多评分有显著差异(P < 0.001)。在逻辑模型检验中,主要因素是阿尔瓦拉多评分(7分及以上),次要因素是疼痛扩散。阿尔瓦拉多评分系统可用于降低将接受急性阑尾炎手术患者的阑尾切除阴性率。

相似文献

1
How much Reliable Is Alvarado Scoring System in Reducing Negative Appendectomy?阿尔瓦拉多评分系统在减少阴性阑尾切除术中的可靠性如何?
Indian J Surg. 2017 Apr;79(2):106-110. doi: 10.1007/s12262-015-1433-2. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
2
Acute appendicitis: diagnostic accuracy of Alvarado scoring system.急性阑尾炎:Alvarado 评分系统的诊断准确性。
Asian J Surg. 2013 Oct;36(4):144-9. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2013.04.004. Epub 2013 May 28.
3
The comparison of the effectiveness of tomography and Alvarado scoring system in patients who underwent surgery with the diagnosis of appendicitis.对诊断为阑尾炎并接受手术的患者进行断层扫描与阿尔瓦拉多评分系统有效性的比较。
Ulus Cerrahi Derg. 2015 Jun 24;32(2):111-4. doi: 10.5152/UCD.2015.2813. eCollection 2016.
4
Evaluation of modified Alvarado scoring system and RIPASA scoring system as diagnostic tools of acute appendicitis.改良阿瓦拉多评分系统和RIPASA评分系统作为急性阑尾炎诊断工具的评估
World J Emerg Med. 2017;8(4):276-280. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2017.04.005.
5
MODIFIED ALVARADO SCORE IN CHILDREN WITH DIAGNOSIS OF APPENDICITIS.诊断为阑尾炎的儿童的改良阿尔瓦拉多评分
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2017 Jan-Mar;30(1):51-52. doi: 10.1590/0102-6720201700010014.
6
The Karaman score: A new diagnostic score for acute appendicitis.卡拉曼评分:一种用于急性阑尾炎的新诊断评分
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2018 Nov;24(6):545-551. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2018.62436.
7
Evaluation of the Alvarado score in acute abdominal pain.阿尔瓦拉多评分在急性腹痛中的评估
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2014 Mar;20(2):86-90. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2014.69639.
8
Evaluation of the Alvarado scoring system in the management of acute appendicitis.阿尔瓦拉多评分系统在急性阑尾炎管理中的评估
Turk J Surg. 2017 Sep 1;33(3):200-204. doi: 10.5152/turkjsurg.2017.3539. eCollection 2017.
9
Evaluation of the Alvarado score in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.阿尔瓦拉多评分在急性阑尾炎诊断中的评估
Acta Chir Iugosl. 2008;55(1):55-61. doi: 10.2298/aci0801055s.
10
Influence of preoperative computed tomography on patients undergoing appendectomy.术前计算机断层扫描对接受阑尾切除术患者的影响。
Am Surg. 2001 Nov;67(11):1017-21.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic Efficacy Study Comparing Tzanakis Scoring System With Alvarado Scoring System in Effective Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis.比较察纳基斯评分系统与阿尔瓦拉多评分系统在急性阑尾炎有效诊断中的诊断效能研究。
Cureus. 2024 Apr 11;16(4):e58018. doi: 10.7759/cureus.58018. eCollection 2024 Apr.
2
The Rate of Negative Appendicectomy and Perforated Appendicitis As Quality Indicators of the General Surgical Service in a District General Hospital in Cavan, Republic of Ireland.爱尔兰共和国卡万一家区综合医院普通外科服务质量指标:阴性阑尾切除术和穿孔性阑尾炎的发生率
Cureus. 2023 Jun 3;15(6):e39895. doi: 10.7759/cureus.39895. eCollection 2023 Jun.
3
Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis: A Cross-sectional Study on Alvarado's Score from a Low Income Country.急性阑尾炎的诊断:一项来自低收入国家的阿尔瓦拉多评分横断面研究。
Open Access Emerg Med. 2023 Jun 16;15:253-258. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S410119. eCollection 2023.
4
The diagnostic value of the systemic immune-inflammatory index in acute appendicitis cases in the emergency department.急诊急性阑尾炎患者全身免疫炎症指数的诊断价值。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Apr 3;408(1):136. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02871-y.
5
Diagnostic accuracy of Alvarado scoring system relative to histopathological diagnosis for acute appendicitis: A retrospective cohort study.阿尔瓦拉多评分系统相对于急性阑尾炎组织病理学诊断的诊断准确性:一项回顾性队列研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 Sep 2;81:104561. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104561. eCollection 2022 Sep.
6
Value of Alvarado scoring system in diagnosis of acute appendicitis.阿尔瓦拉多评分系统在急性阑尾炎诊断中的价值。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 Apr 19;77:103642. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103642. eCollection 2022 May.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk stratification by the Appendicitis Inflammatory Response score to guide decision-making in patients with suspected appendicitis.基于阑尾炎炎症反应评分的风险分层,指导疑似阑尾炎患者的决策制定。
Br J Surg. 2015 Apr;102(5):563-72. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9773. Epub 2015 Mar 2.
2
Predicting acute appendicitis? A comparison of the Alvarado score, the Appendicitis Inflammatory Response Score and clinical assessment.预测急性阑尾炎?阿尔瓦拉多评分、阑尾炎炎症反应评分与临床评估的比较。
World J Surg. 2015 Jan;39(1):104-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2794-6.
3
Do intestinal parasitic infestations in patients with clinically acute appendicitis increase the rate of negative laparotomy? Analysis of 3863 cases from Turkey.临床诊断为急性阑尾炎的患者发生肠道寄生虫感染会增加阴性剖腹探查率吗?来自土耳其的3863例病例分析。
Prz Gastroenterol. 2013;8(6):366-9. doi: 10.5114/pg.2013.39919. Epub 2013 Dec 30.
4
Comparison of Alvarado score evaluation and clinical judgment in acute appendicitis.急性阑尾炎中阿尔瓦拉多评分评估与临床判断的比较
Med Arch. 2014;68(1):10-3. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2014.68.10-13.
5
How reliable is the Alvarado score in acute appendicitis?阿尔瓦拉多评分在急性阑尾炎中可靠性如何?
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2014 Jan;20(1):12-8. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2014.60569.
6
Acute appendicitis: diagnostic accuracy of Alvarado scoring system.急性阑尾炎:Alvarado 评分系统的诊断准确性。
Asian J Surg. 2013 Oct;36(4):144-9. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2013.04.004. Epub 2013 May 28.
7
Appendicitis scores may be useful in reducing the costs of treatment for right lower quadrant pain.阑尾炎评分可能有助于降低右下腹疼痛的治疗成本。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2013 Jan;19(1):13-9. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2013.88714.
8
Diagnostic values of ultrasound and the Modified Alvarado Scoring System in acute appendicitis.超声及改良阿瓦拉多评分系统在急性阑尾炎中的诊断价值。
Int J Emerg Med. 2012 Jun 6;5(1):26. doi: 10.1186/1865-1380-5-26.
9
The Alvarado score for predicting acute appendicitis: a systematic review.阿尔瓦拉多评分预测急性阑尾炎:系统评价。
BMC Med. 2011 Dec 28;9:139. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-9-139.
10
Alvarado scoring in acute appendicitis-a clinicopathological correlation.急性阑尾炎的阿尔瓦拉多评分——临床病理相关性
Indian J Surg. 2010 Aug;72(4):290-3. doi: 10.1007/s12262-010-0190-5. Epub 2010 Nov 18.