Suppr超能文献

急性心肌梗死后室间隔破裂

Ventricular septal rupture following acute myocardial infarction.

作者信息

Koh Angela S, Loh Yee Jim, Lim Yeong Phang, Le Tan Ju

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, National Heart Centre, Singapore.

出版信息

Acta Cardiol. 2011 Apr;66(2):225-30. doi: 10.1080/ac.66.2.2071255.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Ventricular septal rupture (VSR) is a complication of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) that is associated with significant mortality. We aim to review the clinical outcome in the current era.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients admitted to a single tertiary centre from 1997 to 2008 with VSR post-AMI were identified from the local cardiac registry. We performed a retrospective review on 25 patients. Mean age (15 women) was 71 years. Most patients had cardiovascular risk factors (84%); the commonest was hypertension (72%). Anterior AMI (80%) and apical VSR (84%) formed the majority of the cases. Eleven patients (44%) received prior coronary reperfusion therapy either via thrombolysis or PCI. Median time to rupture was 1 day from diagnosis of infarction. More than half (60%) of the patients were in Killip class 3 or 4 at diagnosis of rupture. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 33 +/- 10%. Most patients (80%) required IABP for haemodynamic support. All patients who underwent surgery had ventricular septal repair; amongst them 47% had concomitant CABG. Those managed conservatively were older (P = 0.01). Overall mortality rate was 44%. Most died within the first four days (82%). Surgical and non-surgical survival rates were 68% and 17%, respectively (P= 0.039). Patient demographics, prior coronary reperfusion techniques, Killip class status and LVEF were not significant predictors of mortality. However, non-anterior wall AMI and non-apical VSR were significantly associated with poorer survival (P = 0.009, P = 0.026 respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

While the occurrence ofVSR post-AMI appears to be low compared to earlier studies, it continues to be associated with significant mortality. Non-anterior wall AMI and non-apical VSR were associated with poorer survival and surgical repair conferred survival advantage over conservative management.

摘要

目的

室间隔破裂(VSR)是急性心肌梗死(AMI)的一种并发症,与显著的死亡率相关。我们旨在回顾当前时代的临床结局。

方法与结果

从当地心脏登记处识别出1997年至2008年入住单一三级中心且发生急性心肌梗死后室间隔破裂的患者。我们对25例患者进行了回顾性研究。平均年龄(15名女性)为71岁。大多数患者有心血管危险因素(84%);最常见的是高血压(72%)。前壁急性心肌梗死(80%)和心尖部室间隔破裂(84%)占大多数病例。11例患者(44%)接受过冠状动脉再灌注治疗,包括溶栓或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)。破裂的中位时间为梗死诊断后1天。超过一半(60%)的患者在破裂诊断时处于Killip 3级或4级。平均左心室射血分数(LVEF)为33±10%。大多数患者(80%)需要主动脉内球囊反搏(IABP)进行血流动力学支持。所有接受手术的患者均进行了室间隔修复;其中47%同时进行了冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)。保守治疗的患者年龄较大(P = 0.01)。总体死亡率为44%。大多数患者在头四天内死亡(82%)。手术和非手术生存率分别为68%和17%(P = 0.039)。患者人口统计学、先前的冠状动脉再灌注技术、Killip分级状态和左心室射血分数不是死亡率的显著预测因素。然而,非前壁急性心肌梗死和非心尖部室间隔破裂与较差的生存率显著相关(分别为P = 0.009,P = 0.026)。

结论

虽然与早期研究相比,急性心肌梗死后室间隔破裂的发生率似乎较低,但它仍然与显著的死亡率相关。非前壁急性心肌梗死和非心尖部室间隔破裂与较差的生存率相关,手术修复比保守治疗具有生存优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验