Marcus Ulrich, Schmidt Axel J, Hamouda Osamah
Robert Koch Institute, Post Box 650261, 13302 Berlin, Germany.
Sex Health. 2011 Jun;8(2):184-93. doi: 10.1071/SH10053.
We aimed to quantify the frequency of HIV serosorting among men who have sex with men (MSM) in Germany, and evaluate the association of serosorting with other sexual risk management approaches (RMA) and with the frequency of bacterial sexually transmissible infections (STI).
An anonymous, self-administered questionnaire was distributed through German online sexual networking sites and medical practices in 2006. The analysis was based on 2985 respondents who reported an HIV test result. Based on two questions on RMA, serosorting was classified as tactical (an event-based decision) or strategic (a premeditated search for a seroconcordant partner). The analysis was stratified by HIV serostatus and seroconcordant partnership status.
HIV serosorting patterns were different for HIV-positive and HIV-negative participants. Tactical serosorting ranked second after RMA based on condom use (HIV-positive: 55.1%, HIV-negative: 45.1%; P < 0.001). While the overlap of strategic and tactical HIV serosorting among HIV-positive MSM was substantial (58.0%), HIV-negative strategic and tactical serosorting were more distinct (18.1% overlap). Among HIV-positive and HIV-negative respondents, tactical serosorting was associated with reduced condom use. Compared with respondents using RMA other than serosorting, HIV-positive men reporting serosorting had a three-fold increased risk for bacterial STI (strategic: odds ratio (OR) = 2.62; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.76-3.89; tactical: OR = 3.19; 95% CI: 2.14-4.75; both for respondents without HIV seroconcordant partners).
HIV serosorting has emerged as a common RMA among MSM. For HIV-positive MSM, it may contribute to high rates of bacterial STI that may lead to elevated per-contact risks for HIV transmission.
我们旨在量化德国男男性行为者(MSM)中HIV血清分型的频率,并评估血清分型与其他性风险管控方法(RMA)以及细菌性性传播感染(STI)频率之间的关联。
2006年,通过德国在线性社交网站和医疗机构发放了一份匿名的自填式问卷。分析基于2985名报告了HIV检测结果的受访者。根据关于RMA的两个问题,血清分型被分类为策略性(基于事件的决策)或战略性(预先寻找血清学匹配的伴侣)。分析按HIV血清状态和血清学匹配的伴侣状态进行分层。
HIV阳性和HIV阴性参与者的HIV血清分型模式不同。基于使用避孕套的RMA之后,策略性血清分型排名第二(HIV阳性:55.1%,HIV阴性:45.1%;P<0.001)。虽然HIV阳性MSM中战略性和策略性HIV血清分型的重叠程度很高(58.0%),但HIV阴性的战略性和策略性血清分型更为不同(重叠率为18.1%)。在HIV阳性和HIV阴性受访者中,策略性血清分型与避孕套使用减少有关。与使用非血清分型的RMA的受访者相比,报告进行血清分型的HIV阳性男性患细菌性STI的风险增加了两倍(战略性:优势比(OR)=2.62;95%置信区间(CI):1.76 - 3.89;策略性:OR = 3.19;95% CI:2.14 - 4.75;两者均针对没有HIV血清学匹配伴侣的受访者)。
HIV血清分型已成为MSM中一种常见的RMA。对于HIV阳性的MSM,它可能导致细菌性STI的高发病率,这可能会增加每次接触时HIV传播的风险。