• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Does evaluative learning rely on the perception of contingency?: manipulating contingency and US density during evaluative conditioning.

作者信息

Kattner Florian, Ellermeier Wolfgang

机构信息

Technische Universität Darmstadt, Germany.

出版信息

Exp Psychol. 2011;58(5):391-9. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000108.

DOI:10.1027/1618-3169/a000108
PMID:21592939
Abstract

An experiment is reported studying the impact of objective contingency and contingency judgments on cross-modal evaluative conditioning (EC). Both contingency judgments and evaluative responses were measured after a contingency learning task in which previously neutral sounds served as either weak or strong predictors of affective pictures. Experimental manipulations of contingency and US density were shown to affect contingency judgments. Stronger contingencies were perceived with high contingency and with low US density. The contingency learning task also produced a reliable EC effect. The magnitude of this effect was influenced by an interaction of statistical contingency and US density. Furthermore, the magnitude of EC was correlated with the subjective contingency judgments. Taken together, the results imply that propositional knowledge about the CS-US relationship, as reflected in contingency judgments, moderates evaluative learning. The data are discussed with respect to different accounts of EC.

摘要

相似文献

1
Does evaluative learning rely on the perception of contingency?: manipulating contingency and US density during evaluative conditioning.
Exp Psychol. 2011;58(5):391-9. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000108.
2
Implicit misattribution of evaluative responses: contingency-unaware evaluative conditioning requires simultaneous stimulus presentations.内隐归因错误:无意识条件作用下的评价性条件反射需要同时呈现刺激。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 Aug;142(3):638-43. doi: 10.1037/a0029989. Epub 2012 Sep 3.
3
Contingency learning with evaluative stimuli: testing the generality of contingency learning in a performance paradigm.基于评价性刺激的偶然性学习:在一种表现范式中测试偶然性学习的普遍性。
Exp Psychol. 2012;59(4):175-82. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000141.
4
Evaluative learning with single versus multiple unconditioned stimuli: the role of contingency awareness.单一与多个无条件刺激的评价性学习:偶然性意识的作用。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2009 Apr;35(2):286-91. doi: 10.1037/a0013255.
5
Cue competition in evaluative conditioning as a function of the learning process.作为学习过程函数的评价性条件作用中的线索竞争。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2015 Nov;162:40-50. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.09.013. Epub 2015 Oct 31.
6
Evaluative conditioning and conscious knowledge of contingencies: a correlational investigation with large samples.评价性条件作用与对偶然性的意识知识:一项大样本相关研究。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Dec;63(12):2313-35. doi: 10.1080/17470211003802442. Epub 2010 Jun 11.
7
The effects of assessment type on verbal ratings of conditional stimulus valence and contingency judgments: implications for the extinction of evaluative learning.评估类型对条件刺激效价的言语评定及意外性判断的影响:对评价性学习消退的启示
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2006 Oct;32(4):431-40. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.32.4.431.
8
Positive, negative, or all relative? Evaluative conditioning of ambivalence.积极、消极还是全部相关?矛盾情绪的评价性条件作用。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Apr;185:155-165. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.02.006. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
9
Revisiting the relation between contingency awareness and attention: evaluative conditioning relies on a contingency focus.重新审视偶然性意识和注意力之间的关系:评价性条件作用依赖于偶然性焦点。
Cogn Emot. 2012;26(1):166-75. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2011.565036. Epub 2011 May 24.
10
The role of CS-US contingency in human evaluative conditioning.条件刺激-非条件刺激的关联性在人类评价性条件作用中的作用。
Behav Res Ther. 1993 Nov;31(8):731-7. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(93)90003-d.