Suppr超能文献

丙戊酸盐与锂盐治疗双相情感障碍的临床实践比较:全国观察性基于登记的队列研究。

Valproate v. lithium in the treatment of bipolar disorder in clinical practice: observational nationwide register-based cohort study.

机构信息

Psychiatric Center Copenhagen, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Br J Psychiatry. 2011 Jul;199(1):57-63. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.110.084822. Epub 2011 May 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Valproate is one of the most used mood stabilisers for bipolar disorder, although the evidence for the effectiveness of valproate is sparse.

AIMS

To compare the effect of valproate v. lithium for treatment of bipolar disorder in clinical practice.

METHOD

An observational cohort study with linkage of nationwide registers of all people with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder in psychiatric hospital settings who were prescribed valproate or lithium in Denmark during a period from 1995 to 2006.

RESULTS

A total of 4268 participants were included among whom 719 received valproate and 3549 received lithium subsequent to the diagnosis of bipolar disorder. The rate of switch/add on to the opposite drug (lithium or valproate), antidepressants, antipsychotics or anticonvulsants (other than valproate) was increased for valproate compared with lithium (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.86, 95% CI 1.59-2.16). The rate of psychiatric hospital admissions was increased for valproate v. lithium (HR = 1.33, 95% CI 1.18-1.48) and regardless of the type of episode leading to a hospital admission (depressive or manic/mixed). Similarly, for participants with a depressive index episode (HR = 1.87, 95% CI 1.40-2.48), a manic index episode (HR = 1.24, 95% CI 1.01-1.51) and a mixed index episode (HR = 1.44, 95% CI 1.04-2.01), the overall rate of hospital admissions was significantly increased for valproate compared with lithium.

CONCLUSIONS

In daily clinical practice, treatment with lithium seems in general to be superior to treatment with valproate.

摘要

背景

丙戊酸盐是治疗双相情感障碍最常用的心境稳定剂之一,尽管丙戊酸盐有效性的证据有限。

目的

比较丙戊酸盐与锂治疗双相情感障碍的临床效果。

方法

采用观察性队列研究,对丹麦全国范围内 1995 年至 2006 年间在精神病院接受丙戊酸盐或锂治疗的所有双相情感障碍患者的诊断记录进行了链接。

结果

共纳入 4268 名参与者,其中 719 名患者接受丙戊酸盐治疗,3549 名患者接受锂治疗。与锂相比,丙戊酸盐组转换/添加相反药物(锂或丙戊酸盐)、抗抑郁药、抗精神病药或抗惊厥药(除丙戊酸盐外)的比率增加(危险比(HR)=1.86,95%CI 1.59-2.16)。与锂相比,丙戊酸盐组的精神病院入院率增加(HR=1.33,95%CI 1.18-1.48),且不论导致入院的发作类型(抑郁或躁狂/混合)如何。同样,对于有抑郁指数发作(HR=1.87,95%CI 1.40-2.48)、躁狂指数发作(HR=1.24,95%CI 1.01-1.51)和混合指数发作(HR=1.44,95%CI 1.04-2.01)的患者,丙戊酸盐组的总入院率也明显高于锂组。

结论

在日常临床实践中,锂的治疗总体上似乎优于丙戊酸盐。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验