Geriatrics Division, Jundiaí Medical School, Jundiaí, Brazil.
J Alzheimers Dis. 2011;26(2):221-9. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2011-110125.
One of the challenges in screening for dementia in developing countries is related to performance differences due to educational and cultural factors. This study evaluated the accuracy of single screening tests as well as combined protocols including the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Verbal Fluency animal category (VF), Clock Drawing test (CDT), and Pfeffer Functional Activities Questionnaire (PFAQ) to discriminate illiterate elderly with and without Alzheimer's disease (AD) in a clinical sample. Cross-sectional study with 66 illiterate outpatients diagnosed with mild and moderate AD and 40 illiterate normal controls. Diagnosis of AD was based on NINCDS-ADRDA. All patients were submitted to a diagnostic protocol including a clinical interview based on the CAMDEX sections. ROC curves area analyses were carried out to compare sensitivity and specificity for the cognitive tests to differentiate the two groups (each test separately and in two by two combinations). Scores for all cognitive (MMSE, CDT, VF) and functional assessments (PFAQ) were significantly different between the two groups (p < 0.001). The best screening instruments for this sample of illiterate elderly were the MMSE and the PFAQ. The cut-off scores for the MMSE, VF, CDT, and PFAQ were 17.5, 7.5, 2.5, and 11.5, respectively. The most sensitive combination came from the MMSE and PFAQ (94.1%), and the best specificity was observed with the combination of the MMSE and CDT (89%). Illiterate patients can be successfully screened for AD using well-known screening instruments, especially in combined protocols.
在发展中国家进行痴呆筛查的挑战之一与由于教育和文化因素导致的表现差异有关。本研究评估了单一筛查测试以及包括简易精神状态检查(MMSE)、词语流畅性动物类别(VF)、画钟测验(CDT)和 Pfeffer 功能活动问卷(PFAQ)在内的组合方案的准确性,以区分临床样本中患有和不患有阿尔茨海默病(AD)的文盲老年人。这项横断面研究纳入了 66 名被诊断为轻度和中度 AD 的文盲门诊患者和 40 名文盲正常对照者。AD 的诊断基于 NINCDS-ADRDA。所有患者均接受了诊断方案,包括基于 CAMDEX 部分的临床访谈。为了比较认知测试区分两组(每个测试单独和两两组合)的敏感性和特异性,进行了 ROC 曲线面积分析。两组之间的所有认知(MMSE、CDT、VF)和功能评估(PFAQ)评分均有显著差异(p<0.001)。对于这个文盲老年人群体,最佳的筛查工具是 MMSE 和 PFAQ。MMSE、VF、CDT 和 PFAQ 的截断分数分别为 17.5、7.5、2.5 和 11.5。最敏感的组合来自 MMSE 和 PFAQ(94.1%),而 MMSE 和 CDT 的组合特异性最佳(89%)。可以使用知名的筛查工具,尤其是在组合方案中,成功地对文盲患者进行 AD 筛查。