Spenciere Bárbara, Alves Heloisa, Charchat-Fichman Helenice
BsC, Department of Psychology, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro RJ - Brazil.
PhD, Department of Psychology, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro RJ - Brazil.
Dement Neuropsychol. 2017 Jan-Mar;11(1):6-14. doi: 10.1590/1980-57642016dn11-010003.
The Clock Drawing Test (CDT) is a simple neuropsychological screening instrument that is well accepted by patients and has solid psychometric properties. Several different CDT scoring methods have been developed, but no consensus has been reached regarding which scoring method is the most accurate. This article reviews the literature on these scoring systems and the changes they have undergone over the years. Historically, different types of scoring systems emerged. Initially, the focus was on screening for dementia, and the methods were both quantitative and semi-quantitative. Later, the need for an early diagnosis called for a scoring system that can detect subtle errors, especially those related to executive function. Therefore, qualitative analyses began to be used for both differential and early diagnoses of dementia. A widely used qualitative method was proposed by Rouleau et al. (1992). Tracing the historical path of these scoring methods is important for developing additional scoring systems and furthering dementia prevention research.
钟表绘制测试(CDT)是一种简单的神经心理学筛查工具,深受患者认可,且具有可靠的心理测量特性。已经开发出几种不同的CDT评分方法,但对于哪种评分方法最准确尚未达成共识。本文回顾了关于这些评分系统及其多年来所经历变化的文献。从历史上看,出现了不同类型的评分系统。最初,重点是筛查痴呆症,方法既有定量的也有半定量的。后来,早期诊断的需求要求有一个能够检测细微错误的评分系统,尤其是那些与执行功能相关的错误。因此,定性分析开始用于痴呆症的鉴别诊断和早期诊断。Rouleau等人(1992年)提出了一种广泛使用的定性方法。追溯这些评分方法的历史路径对于开发更多评分系统和推进痴呆症预防研究很重要。