Suppr超能文献

裂隙深度和牙釉质处理方案对玻璃离子水门汀和树脂型窝沟封闭剂渗透的影响。

The impact of fissure depth and enamel conditioning protocols on glass-ionomer and resin-based fissure sealant penetration.

机构信息

Faculty of Dentistry, Belgrade University, Clinic for Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Belgrade, Serbia.

出版信息

J Adhes Dent. 2011 Apr;13(2):171-8. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a19006.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect that fissure depth and enamel conditioning protocols have on penetration abilities of resin-based and glass-ionomer fissure sealants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty extracted human molars were randomized into 10 experimental groups. Conditioning was performed as follows: groups I and VI, no pretreatment; groups II and VII, 10% polyacrylic acid and 37% phosphoric acid, respectively; groups III and VIII, self-etching adhesive; groups IV and IX, Er:YAG laser; groups V and X, Er:YAG laser/10% polyacrylic acid and laser/37% phosphoric acid, respectively. In groups I to V, teeth were sealed with a glass-ionomer material, and in groups VI to X a resin-based sealant was used. The sealed teeth were sectioned and the penetration ability was evaluated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

RESULTS

Pretreatment with a suitable acid resulted in superior penetration of glass-ionomer and resin-based sealant when compared with other conditioning protocols (p < 0.0001), except for the teeth treated with both Er:YAG laser and acid. Both conditioning protocol and fissure depth significantly affected the sealant penetration (p < 0.0001), but fissure depth had a greater impact on fissure penetration than did conditioning protocol.

CONCLUSION

Resin-based and glass-ionomer sealing materials show similar potential for pit-and-fissure penetration. Penetration of a fissure sealant is largely influenced by the fissure depth. Regarding the conditioning protocol, a pretreatment with a suitable acid is essential to obtain an adequate penetration of a sealing material.

摘要

目的

评估裂隙深度和牙釉质处理方案对树脂基和玻璃离子水门汀类窝沟封闭剂渗透能力的影响。

材料与方法

50 颗人离体磨牙随机分为 10 个实验组。处理方法如下:I 组和 VI 组不预处理;II 组和 VII 组分别使用 10%聚丙烯酸和 37%磷酸;III 组和 VIII 组使用自酸蚀粘结剂;IV 组和 IX 组使用 Er:YAG 激光;V 组和 X 组分别使用 Er:YAG 激光/10%聚丙烯酸和激光/37%磷酸。I 组到 V 组的牙齿用玻璃离子水门汀封闭,VI 组到 X 组的牙齿用树脂基封闭剂封闭。对封闭后的牙齿进行切片,用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)评估渗透能力。

结果

与其他处理方案相比,适当的酸预处理可显著提高玻璃离子和树脂基封闭剂的渗透能力(p < 0.0001),但 Er:YAG 激光和酸联合处理的牙齿除外。处理方案和裂隙深度均显著影响封闭剂的渗透(p < 0.0001),但裂隙深度对裂隙渗透的影响大于处理方案。

结论

树脂基和玻璃离子水门汀类窝沟封闭材料具有相似的窝沟渗透潜力。封闭剂的渗透能力主要受裂隙深度的影响。就处理方案而言,适当的酸预处理对于获得足够的封闭材料渗透至关重要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验