University of Lincoln, UK.
Drug Test Anal. 2011 Sep;3(9):576-81. doi: 10.1002/dta.274. Epub 2011 May 19.
In recent years the availability of so-called legal highs over the Internet has hugely increased. Numerous online legal-high retailers market a broad variety of products which are advertised as research chemicals, bath salts, or plant food although clearly intended for human consumption as recreational drug replacements. No guidelines exist as to what is sold and in what purity. Consumers are led to believe that purchased goods are entirely legal. In this study, several legal-high products were purchased and analyzed for their content. The powdered products were screened with attenuated total reflectance-Fourier Transform Infrared (ATR-FTIR) followed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis of methanol extracts. Spectra were compared to reference standards and the NIST library. Results showed that 6 out of 7 products did not contain the advertised active ingredient. Moreover, five samples contained the controlled substances benzylpiperazine and 1-[3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]piperazine combined with caffeine.
近年来,互联网上所谓的合法兴奋剂的供应大大增加。许多在线合法兴奋剂零售商销售各种产品,这些产品被宣传为研究化学品、浴盐或植物食品,尽管显然是作为娱乐性药物替代品供人类消费的。对于销售什么以及销售的纯度如何,没有任何指导方针。消费者被误导认为购买的商品是完全合法的。在这项研究中,购买了几种合法兴奋剂产品并对其含量进行了分析。对粉状产品进行衰减全反射傅里叶变换红外(ATR-FTIR)筛选,然后对甲醇提取物进行气相色谱-质谱(GC-MS)分析。将光谱与参考标准和 NIST 库进行比较。结果表明,7 种产品中有 6 种不含有宣传的有效成分。此外,有 5 个样品含有受控物质苯丙哌嗪和 1-[3-(三氟甲基)苯基]哌嗪与咖啡因的混合物。