O'Connor Ayrn D, Padilla-Jones Angie, Gerkin Richard D, Levine Michael
Department of Medical Toxicology, Banner Good Samaritan Medical Center; Department of Internal Medicine, and Center for Toxicology and Pharmacology Education and Research, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA,
J Med Toxicol. 2015 Jun;11(2):195-200. doi: 10.1007/s13181-014-0451-y.
Synthetic cathinones have emerged as popular drugs of abuse and produce sympathomimetic toxicity. It is unknown if rhabdomyolysis occurs more frequently following the use of synthetic cathinones compared to other stimulants. This retrospective study sought to determine the prevalence of rhabdomyolysis in patients with sympathomimetic toxicity and compare rates among patients using specific agents. Patients greater than 14 years of age with sympathomimetic toxicity and detection of a stimulant agent in urine via gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy (GC-MS) were included. Patients were excluded if clinical sympathomimetic toxicity was not present, a serum creatine kinase (CK) was not measured, or urine GC-MS was not performed. Rhabdomyolysis and severe rhabdomyolysis were defined as CK > 1000 and 10,000 IU/L, respectively. Prevalence of rhabdomyolysis and severe rhabdomyolysis were reported. Logistic regression was performed to determine the relative effect in single-agent exposures of a synthetic cathinone compared to other sympathomimetics on rhabdomyolysis. A secondary outcome, a composite endpoint defined as need for mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy, development of compartment syndrome, or death, was also analyzed. One hundred two subjects met inclusion criteria; median age (IQR) was 32 (25-42) years with a range of 14-65 years; 74 % were male. Rhabdomyolysis occurred in 42 % (43/102) of subjects. Patients whose sympathomimetic toxicity could be ascribed to a single agent were considered for further statistical analysis and placed into four groups: methamphetamine (n = 55), synthetic cathinone (n = 19), cocaine (n = 9), and other sympathomimetic (n = 6). In 89 subjects with single stimulant exposure, the prevalence of rhabdomyolysis was as follows: synthetic cathinone, 12/19 (63 %); methamphetamine, 22/55 (40 %); cocaine, 3/9 (33 %); and other single agent, 0/6 (0 %). The occurrence of severe rhabdomyolysis (CK > 10,000 IU/L) for each of the four groups was synthetic cathinone with 5/19 (26 %), methamphetamine with 2/55 (3.6 %), cocaine with 1/9 (11 %), and other with 0/6 (0 %). Median maximal CK (range) by groups was as follows: synthetic cathinone, 2638 (62-350,000+) IU/L; methamphetamine, 665 (61-50,233) IU/L; cocaine, 276 (87-25,614) IU/L; and other, 142 (51-816) IU/L. A statistically significant difference (p = 0.004) was found when comparing maximal CK among the four groups. Exposure to a synthetic cathinone compared with other sympathomimetics was associated with increased risk of developing rhabdomyolysis and severe rhabdomyolysis with odds ratios of 3.09 and 7.98, respectively. In this cohort of patients with sympathomimetic toxicity, 42 % developed rhabdomyolysis. Synthetic cathinones were associated with an increased risk of rhabdomyolysis and severe rhabdomyolysis compared with other stimulants.
合成卡西酮已成为流行的滥用药物,并会产生拟交感神经毒性。与其他兴奋剂相比,使用合成卡西酮后横纹肌溶解是否更频繁发生尚不清楚。这项回顾性研究旨在确定拟交感神经毒性患者中横纹肌溶解的患病率,并比较使用特定药物的患者之间的发生率。纳入年龄大于14岁、有拟交感神经毒性且通过气相色谱-质谱联用仪(GC-MS)检测到尿液中有兴奋剂的患者。如果不存在临床拟交感神经毒性、未测量血清肌酸激酶(CK)或未进行尿液GC-MS检测,则将患者排除。横纹肌溶解和严重横纹肌溶解分别定义为CK>1000和10000 IU/L。报告了横纹肌溶解和严重横纹肌溶解的患病率。进行逻辑回归以确定与其他拟交感神经药物相比,合成卡西酮单药暴露对横纹肌溶解的相对影响。还分析了一个次要结局,即定义为需要机械通气、肾脏替代治疗、发生骨筋膜室综合征或死亡的复合终点。102名受试者符合纳入标准;中位年龄(四分位间距)为32(25-42)岁,范围为14-65岁;74%为男性。42%(43/102)的受试者发生了横纹肌溶解。拟交感神经毒性可归因于单一药物的患者被纳入进一步的统计分析,并分为四组:甲基苯丙胺(n = 55)、合成卡西酮(n = 19)、可卡因(n = 9)和其他拟交感神经药物(n = 6)。在89名单一兴奋剂暴露的受试者中,横纹肌溶解的患病率如下:合成卡西酮,12/19(63%);甲基苯丙胺,22/55(40%);可卡因,3/9(33%);其他单一药物,0/6(0%)。四组中严重横纹肌溶解(CK>10000 IU/L)的发生率分别为:合成卡西酮5/19(26%)、甲基苯丙胺2/55(3.6%)、可卡因1/9(11%)、其他0/6(0%)。各组的CK最大值中位数(范围)如下:合成卡西酮,2638(62-350000+)IU/L;甲基苯丙胺,665(61-50233)IU/L;可卡因,276(87-25614)IU/L;其他,142(51-816)IU/L。比较四组的CK最大值时发现有统计学显著差异(p = 0.004)。与其他拟交感神经药物相比,合成卡西酮暴露与发生横纹肌溶解和严重横纹肌溶解的风险增加相关,优势比分别为3.09和7.98。在这组有拟交感神经毒性的患者中,42%发生了横纹肌溶解。与其他兴奋剂相比,合成卡西酮与横纹肌溶解和严重横纹肌溶解的风险增加相关。