Suppr超能文献

中危急性髓系白血病的风险分层:多种基因突变和基因表达标志物的综合分析。

Risk stratification of intermediate-risk acute myeloid leukemia: integrative analysis of a multitude of gene mutation and gene expression markers.

机构信息

Departments of Hematology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Blood. 2011 Jul 28;118(4):1069-76. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-02-334748. Epub 2011 May 19.

Abstract

Numerous molecular markers have been recently discovered as potential prognostic factors in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). It has become of critical importance to thoroughly evaluate their interrelationships and relative prognostic importance. Gene expression profiling was conducted in a well-characterized cohort of 439 AML patients (age < 60 years) to determine expression levels of EVI1, WT1, BCL2, ABCB1, BAALC, FLT3, CD34, INDO, ERG and MN1. A variety of AML-specific mutations were evaluated, that is, FLT3, NPM1, N-RAS, K-RAS, IDH1, IDH2, and CEBPA(DM/SM) (double/single). Univariable survival analysis shows that (1) patients with FLT3(ITD) mutations have inferior overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS), whereas CEBPA(DM) and NPM1 mutations indicate favorable OS and EFS in intermediate-risk AML, and (2) high transcript levels of BAALC, CD34, MN1, EVl1, and ERG predict inferior OS and EFS. In multivariable survival analysis, CD34, ERG, and CEBPA(DM) remain significant. Using survival tree and regression methodologies, we show that CEBPA(DM), CD34, and IDH2 mutations are capable of separating the intermediate group into 2 AML subgroups with highly distinctive survival characteristics (OS at 60 months: 51.9% vs 14.9%). The integrated statistical approach demonstrates that from the multitude of biomarkers a greatly condensed subset can be selected for improved stratification of intermediate-risk AML.

摘要

最近发现了许多分子标志物可作为急性髓细胞白血病 (AML) 的潜在预后因素。彻底评估它们之间的相互关系及其相对预后重要性至关重要。对 439 名年龄<60 岁的 AML 患者进行了充分特征描述的队列进行了基因表达谱分析,以确定 EVI1、WT1、BCL2、ABCB1、BAALC、FLT3、CD34、INDO、ERG 和 MN1 的表达水平。评估了各种 AML 特异性突变,即 FLT3、NPM1、N-RAS、K-RAS、IDH1、IDH2 和 CEBPA(DM/SM)(双/单)。单变量生存分析表明:(1) FLT3(ITD)突变患者的总生存 (OS) 和无事件生存 (EFS) 较差,而 CEBPA(DM)和 NPM1 突变表明中危 AML 的 OS 和 EFS 有利,(2) BAALC、CD34、MN1、EVI1 和 ERG 的高转录水平预示着 OS 和 EFS 较差。在多变量生存分析中,CD34、ERG 和 CEBPA(DM)仍然具有统计学意义。使用生存树和回归方法,我们表明 CEBPA(DM)、CD34 和 IDH2 突变能够将中间组分成具有高度独特生存特征的 2 个 AML 亚组(60 个月 OS:51.9%对 14.9%)。综合统计方法表明,从众多生物标志物中,可以选择一个大大简化的子集,以改善中间风险 AML 的分层。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验