Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik 1, Medizinische Fakultät und Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
AvenCell Europe GmbH, Dresden, Germany.
Leukemia. 2024 Feb;38(2):281-290. doi: 10.1038/s41375-024-02140-x. Epub 2024 Jan 16.
Despite recent refinements in the diagnostic and prognostic assessment of CEBPA mutations in AML, several questions remain open, i.e. implications of different types of basic region leucin zipper (bZIP) mutations, the role of co-mutations and the allelic state. Using pooled primary data analysis on 1010 CEBPA-mutant adult AML patients, a comparison was performed taking into account the type of mutation (bZIP: either typical in-frame insertion/deletion (InDel) mutations (bZIP), frameshift InDel or nonsense mutations inducing translational stop (bZIP) or single base-pair missense alterations (bZIP), and transcription activation domain (TAD) mutations) and the allelic state (single (smCEBPA) vs. double mutant (dmCEBPA)). Only bZIP patients had significantly higher rates of complete remission and longer relapse free and overall survival (OS) compared with all other CEBPA-mutant subgroups. Moreover, co-mutations in bZIP patients (e.g. GATA2, FLT3, WT1 as well as ELN2022 adverse risk aberrations) had no independent impact on OS, whereas in non-bZIP patients, grouping according to ELN2022 recommendations added significant prognostic information. In conclusion, these results demonstrate bZIP mutations to be the major independent determinant of outcome in CEBPA-mutant AML, thereby refining current classifications according to WHO (including all dmCEBPA and smCEBPA bZIP) as well as ELN2022 and ICC recommendations (including CEBPA bZIP).
尽管最近在 AML 中 CEBPA 突变的诊断和预后评估方面有所改进,但仍有几个问题悬而未决,例如不同类型的碱性区域亮氨酸拉链(bZIP)突变、共突变的作用以及等位基因状态的影响。通过对 1010 例 CEBPA 突变的成人 AML 患者的汇总原始数据分析,考虑到突变类型(bZIP:典型的框内插入/缺失(InDel)突变(bZIP)、移码 InDel 或导致翻译终止的无意义突变(bZIP)或单碱基对错义改变(bZIP),以及转录激活域(TAD)突变)和等位基因状态(单(smCEBPA)与双突变(dmCEBPA)),进行了比较。与所有其他 CEBPA 突变亚组相比,只有 bZIP 患者的完全缓解率更高,无复发生存和总生存期(OS)更长。此外,bZIP 患者的共突变(例如 GATA2、FLT3、WT1 以及 ELN2022 不良风险异常)对 OS 没有独立影响,而在非 bZIP 患者中,根据 ELN2022 建议进行分组增加了显著的预后信息。总之,这些结果表明 bZIP 突变是 CEBPA 突变 AML 中独立的主要预后决定因素,从而根据 WHO(包括所有 dmCEBPA 和 smCEBPA bZIP)以及 ELN2022 和 ICC 建议(包括 CEBPA bZIP)对当前分类进行了细化。