Suppr超能文献

堕胎、形而上学与道德:评弗朗西斯·贝克威斯的《捍卫生命:反对堕胎选择的道德与法律依据》

Abortion, metaphysics and morality: a review of Francis Beckwith's defending life: a moral and legal case against abortion choice.

作者信息

Nobis Nathan

机构信息

Morehouse College, Atlanta, GA 30030, USA.

出版信息

J Med Philos. 2011 Jun;36(3):261-73. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhr015. Epub 2011 May 19.

Abstract

In Defending Life: A Moral and Legal Case Against Abortion Choice (2007) and an earlier article in this journal, "Defending Abortion Philosophically"(2006), Francis Beckwith argues that fetuses are, from conception, prima facie wrong to kill. His arguments are based on what he calls a "metaphysics of the human person" known as "The Substance View." I argue that Beckwith's metaphysics does not support his abortion ethic: Moral, not metaphysical, claims that are part of this Substance View are the foundation of the argument, and Beckwith inadequately defends these moral claims. Thus, Beckwith's arguments do not provide strong support for what he calls the "pro-life" view of abortion.

摘要

在《捍卫生命:反对堕胎选择的道德与法律理由》(2007年)以及发表于本期刊的一篇更早的文章《从哲学角度捍卫堕胎》(2006年)中,弗朗西斯·贝克威斯认为,从受孕之时起,杀死胎儿初步看来就是错误的。他的论证基于他所谓的一种名为“实体观”的“关于人的形而上学”。我认为贝克威斯的形而上学并不支持他的堕胎伦理观:作为这种实体观一部分的道德主张而非形而上学主张才是该论证的基础,并且贝克威斯对这些道德主张的辩护并不充分。因此,贝克威斯的论证并未为他所谓的堕胎“生命权”观点提供有力支持。

相似文献

3
Abortion ethics.堕胎伦理
Nurs Outlook. 1982 Apr;30(4):234-40.
4
Defending my "rethinking" of Roe.为我对罗诉韦德案的“重新思考”辩护。
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Dec;10(12):W3-5. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2010.530911.
5
Abortion and moral arguments from analogy.堕胎与基于类比的道德论证。
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Dec;10(12):59-61. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2010.530909.
9

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验