• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Critical notice--defending life: a moral and legal case against abortion choice by Francis J Beckwith.

作者信息

Stretton D

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2008 Nov;34(11):793-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.023606.

DOI:10.1136/jme.2007.023606
PMID:18974412
Abstract

Francis Beckwith's Defending life: a moral and legal case against abortion choice defends the pro-life position on moral, legal and political grounds. In this critical notice I consider three key issues and argue that Beckwith's treatment of each of them is unpersuasive. The issues are: (1) whether abortion is politically justified by the principle that we should err on the side of liberty in the face of reasonable disagreement over the moral status of the fetus; (2) whether the fetus's natural capacity or genetic propensity to develop rationality and communication is sufficient to give it a moral right to life; and (3) whether abortion is morally justified on the basis of bodily rights. I also show that Beckwith's book fails to consider several important issues and arguments.

摘要

相似文献

1
Critical notice--defending life: a moral and legal case against abortion choice by Francis J Beckwith.
J Med Ethics. 2008 Nov;34(11):793-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.023606.
2
Abortion, metaphysics and morality: a review of Francis Beckwith's defending life: a moral and legal case against abortion choice.堕胎、形而上学与道德:评弗朗西斯·贝克威斯的《捍卫生命:反对堕胎选择的道德与法律依据》
J Med Philos. 2011 Jun;36(3):261-73. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhr015. Epub 2011 May 19.
3
Toward a Copernican revolution in our thinking about life's beginning and life's end.朝着我们对生命起点和生命终点的思考方式的哥白尼式革命迈进。
Soundings. 1983 Summer;66(2):152-73.
4
A dualist analysis of abortion: personhood and the concept of self qua experiential subject.堕胎的二元论分析:人格与作为经验主体的自我概念。
J Med Ethics. 2005 Jan;31(1):48-55. doi: 10.1136/jme.2002.000828.
5
A critical analysis of the concept and discourse of 'unborn child'.对“未出生胎儿”概念及相关论述的批判性分析。
Am J Bioeth. 2008 Jul;8(7):34-9. doi: 10.1080/15265160802248161.
6
Clarifications on the moral status of newborns and the normative implications.对新生儿道德地位的澄清及其规范意义。
J Med Ethics. 2013 May;39(5):264-5. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-101036.
7
Having a life versus being alive.拥有生活与仅仅活着。
J Med Ethics. 1984 Mar;10(1):5-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.10.1.5.
8
Abortions and distortions: an analysis of morally irrelevant factors in Thomson's violinist thought experiment.堕胎与歪曲:对汤姆森小提琴家思想实验中道德无关因素的分析
Soc Theory Pract. 2001 Jan;27(1):129-48.
9
Defending my "rethinking" of Roe.为我对罗诉韦德案的“重新思考”辩护。
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Dec;10(12):W3-5. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2010.530911.
10
Limitations on personhood arguments for abortion and 'after-birth abortion'.对堕胎和“出生后堕胎”的人格论论据的限制。
J Med Ethics. 2013 May;39(5):e15-8. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100958.

引用本文的文献

1
Strange Bedfellows? Common Ground on the Moral Status Question.奇怪的盟友?道德地位问题上的共同立场。
J Med Philos. 2016 Apr;41(2):130-47. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhv066. Epub 2016 Feb 17.