• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Euthanasia and common sense: a reply to Garcia.

作者信息

Seay Gary

机构信息

Medgar Evers College, City University of New York, USA.

出版信息

J Med Philos. 2011 Jun;36(3):321-7. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhr016. Epub 2011 May 19.

DOI:10.1093/jmp/jhr016
PMID:21597086
Abstract

J. L. A. Garcia holds that my defense of voluntary euthanasia in an earlier paper amounts to an "assault on traditional common sense" about what medical ethics permits physicians to do, particularly insofar as I hold that a physician's duty to abstain from intentionally killing is only a defeasible duty, not an unconditional one. But I argue here that it is Garcia's views that are more at odds with common sense, and that voluntary euthanasia is in fact a humane alternative that respects patient autonomy and is consistent with the most fundamental moral duties of physicians. Among these is a duty to relieve suffering, which can sometimes outweigh the fundamental duty to conserve life.

摘要

相似文献

1
Euthanasia and common sense: a reply to Garcia.
J Med Philos. 2011 Jun;36(3):321-7. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhr016. Epub 2011 May 19.
2
Health versus harm: euthanasia and physicians' duties.健康与伤害:安乐死与医生的职责
J Med Philos. 2007 Jan-Feb;32(1):7-24. doi: 10.1080/03605310601152966.
3
Euthanasia and physicians' moral duties.
J Med Philos. 2005 Oct;30(5):517-33. doi: 10.1080/03605310500253071.
4
Other people's lives: reflections on medicine, ethics, and euthanasia.他人的生命:关于医学、伦理与安乐死的思考
Issues Law Med. 2009 Summer;25(1):45-79.
5
[Euthanasia--a moral choice?].[安乐死——一种道德选择?]
Laeknabladid. 2007 Jul-Aug;93(7-8):543-51.
6
Do physicians have an inviolable duty not to kill?
J Med Philos. 2001 Feb;26(1):75-91. doi: 10.1076/jmep.26.1.75.3031.
7
Healing and killing, harming and not harming: physician participation in euthanasia and capital punishment.治愈与杀戮、伤害与不伤害:医生参与安乐死和死刑的问题。
J Clin Ethics. 1992 Spring;3(1):29-34; discussion 35-7.
8
Euthanasia: why it doesn't matter (much) what the doctor thinks and why there is no suggestion that doctors should have a duty to kill.安乐死:为何医生的想法(很大程度上)无关紧要,以及为何不存在医生应承担杀人职责的提议。
J Law Med. 2002 Nov;10(2):221-31.
9
Voluntary active euthanasia.自愿主动安乐死。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1992 Mar-Apr;22(2):10-22.
10
[Indirect euthanasia from the ethical viewpoint].[从伦理角度看间接安乐死]
Neuere Med Wiss Quellen Stud. 2011;27:117-68.

引用本文的文献

1
The Final Act: An Ethical Analysis of Pia Dijkstra's Euthanasia for a Completed Life.《终章:皮娅·迪克斯特拉完成生命计划安乐死的伦理分析》
J Bioeth Inq. 2021 Mar;18(1):165-175. doi: 10.1007/s11673-020-10084-x. Epub 2021 Jan 15.