Neurology, Virology, and Immunology, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, Connecticut, USA.
Cancer. 2012 Jan 15;118(2):461-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26213. Epub 2011 May 19.
Combination therapy with ixabepilone and capecitabine (cape) is approved for use in patients with locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer that is resistant to treatment with anthracyclines or taxanes. The current study evaluated the trade-off between quality and quantity of life using quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity (Q-TWiST) outcomes.
Within the trial, 752 women were randomly assigned to receive either the combination of ixabepilone and cape (once every 21 days) or cape alone (on days 1-14). The area under the survival curve was partitioned into 3 health states: toxicity (TOX), time without symptoms of disease progression or toxicity, and recurrence (relapse [REL]). The mean time in each health state was weighted by a range of utilities and summed to estimate quality-adjusted survival (QAS). Patient-reported outcomes were also evaluated using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)-Breast Symptom Index (FBSI).
A statistically significant difference between groups with regard to change from baseline FBSI scores favoring the cape group was observed (P = .0002), but no differences were observed after adjusting for deaths in the analysis. All combinations of utilities for REL and TOX resulted in an observed difference in QAS favoring combination therapy. Differences were found to be statistically significant for comparisons, with higher tolerance for TOX. QAS was found to be greater for the combination therapy group (42.2 weeks vs 38.4 weeks), assuming the base case scenario of utility equal to 0.5 for both TOX and REL (P = .0227).
The Q-TWiST analysis supports a positive benefit-risk ratio for the combination of ixabepilone plus cape in patients with advanced/metastatic breast cancer that is refractory to anthracyclines and taxanes versus cape alone, despite the potential for added toxicities with combination therapy.
伊沙匹隆联合卡培他滨(卡培)适用于治疗对蒽环类药物或紫杉类药物耐药的局部晚期/转移性乳腺癌。本研究使用调整后的无毒性或症状时间质量调整生存时间(Q-TWiST)结果来评估生活质量与数量之间的权衡。
在试验中,752 名女性被随机分配接受伊沙匹隆联合卡培他滨(每 21 天一次)或卡培他滨单药治疗(第 1-14 天)。生存曲线下的面积分为 3 种健康状态:毒性(TOX)、无疾病进展或毒性症状时间和复发(复发[REL])。每个健康状态的平均时间由一系列效用加权,并求和以估计质量调整生存(QAS)。还使用癌症治疗功能评估-乳房症状指数(FACT-BSI)评估患者报告的结果。
与卡培组相比,观察到组间 FBSI 评分从基线变化有统计学意义(P=0.0002),但在分析中调整死亡后没有差异。REL 和 TOX 的所有效用组合均导致组合治疗有利于 QAS 的观察差异。在比较中发现差异具有统计学意义,对毒性的容忍度更高。假设 TOX 和 REL 的效用均为 0.5(P=0.0227),则联合治疗组的 QAS 更高(42.2 周比 38.4 周)。
尽管联合治疗可能会增加毒性,但 Q-TWiST 分析支持伊沙匹隆联合卡培他滨在蒽环类药物和紫杉类药物耐药的晚期/转移性乳腺癌患者中的阳性获益风险比,优于卡培他滨单药治疗。