• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单目瞳孔计与双目自由浏览自动验光仪瞳孔测量功能的比较。

Comparison of a monocular pupillometer and the pupillometry function of a binocular free-viewing autorefractor.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas, USA.

出版信息

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Jul;37(7):1257-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.01.026. Epub 2011 May 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.01.026
PMID:21601418
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare a binocular free-viewing autorefractor pupillometer (WAM 5500 Binocular Accommodation Instrument) and a monocular occlusion pupillometer (Neuroptics pupillometer).

SETTING

Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas, USA.

DESIGN

Evaluation of diagnostic test or technology.

METHODS

Normal subjects were tested under 1 lux and 7 lux ambient illumination with controlled distance fixation. The monocular occlusion pupillometer and free-viewing autorefractor pupillometer test order and eye test order were randomized. Devices were compared using Bland-Altman plots. Effects of eye test order and device test order were analyzed. The number of outliers (ie, difference ≥ 0.5 mm between devices) was tabulated.

RESULTS

The mean device difference (monocular pupillometer minus binocular pupillometer) was +0.51 mm ± 0.36 (SD) (range -0.20 to +1.50 mm) in right eyes and +0.27 ± 0.31 mm (SD) (range -0.30 to +1.00 mm) in left eyes at 1 lux and +0.26 ± 0.28 mm (range -0.30 to +0.90 mm) and +0.21 ± 0.24 mm (range -0.80 to +0.40 mm), respectively, at 7 lux. The outlier frequency (N = 49) at 1 lux was 23 (47%) in right eyes and 7 (14%) in left eyes and at 7 lux, 11 (22%) and 10 (20%), respectively. At all age decades, the free-viewing autorefractor underestimated dark-adapted pupil diameter. Eye test order and device order did not cause unidirectional bias.

CONCLUSIONS

The free-viewing pupillometer frequently disagreed with the monocular occlusion pupillometer by more than 0.5 mm. Testing the first eye with the monocular pupillometer did not induce sustained pupillary constriction that might bias results in the second eye.

摘要

目的

比较双目自由观看自动折射计瞳孔计(WAM 5500 双目调节仪器)和单目遮盖瞳孔计。

设置

美国德克萨斯州立大学健康科学中心眼科和视觉科学系。

设计

诊断测试或技术的评估。

方法

在 1 勒克斯和 7 勒克斯环境照明下,对正常受试者进行控制距离固定的测试。单目遮盖瞳孔计和自由观看自动折射计瞳孔计的测试顺序和眼测试顺序是随机的。使用 Bland-Altman 图比较设备。分析眼测试顺序和设备测试顺序的影响。记录离群值(即设备之间的差异≥0.5 毫米)的数量。

结果

右眼在 1 勒克斯时的平均设备差异(单目瞳孔计减去双目瞳孔计)为+0.51 毫米±0.36(SD)(范围-0.20 至+1.50 毫米),左眼为+0.27±0.31 毫米(SD)(范围-0.30 至+1.00 毫米),在 7 勒克斯时分别为+0.26±0.28 毫米(范围-0.30 至+0.90 毫米)和+0.21±0.24 毫米(范围-0.80 至+0.40 毫米)。在 1 勒克斯时,右眼离群值(N=49)为 23(47%),左眼为 7(14%),在 7 勒克斯时,右眼为 11(22%),左眼为 10(20%)。在所有年龄阶段,自由观看自动折射计都低估了暗适应瞳孔直径。眼测试顺序和设备顺序没有造成单向偏差。

结论

自由观看瞳孔计与单目遮盖瞳孔计的差异经常超过 0.5 毫米。先用单目瞳孔计测试第一只眼,不会引起第二只眼的瞳孔持续收缩,从而不会影响结果的偏倚。

相似文献

1
Comparison of a monocular pupillometer and the pupillometry function of a binocular free-viewing autorefractor.单目瞳孔计与双目自由浏览自动验光仪瞳孔测量功能的比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Jul;37(7):1257-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.01.026. Epub 2011 May 20.
2
Clinical performance of a handheld digital infrared monocular pupillometer for measurement of the dark-adapted pupil diameter.手持式数字红外单目瞳孔计测量暗适应瞳孔直径的临床性能。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Feb;36(2):277-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.09.025.
3
Comparison of Colvard pupillometer and infrared digital photography for measurement of the dark-adapted pupil diameter.用于测量暗适应瞳孔直径的科尔瓦德瞳孔计与红外数码摄影的比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005 Nov;31(11):2129-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.04.041.
4
Comparison of 2 monocular pupillometers and an autorefractor for measurement of the dark-adapted pupil diameter.比较 2 种单目瞳孔计和自动验光仪测量暗适应瞳孔直径。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Apr;37(4):660-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.10.059.
5
Comparison of monocular and binocular infrared pupillometers under mesopic lighting conditions.在中间光照条件下,单目和双目红外瞳孔计的比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Apr;36(4):625-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.11.006.
6
Comparison of 2 multiple-measurement infrared pupillometers to determine scotopic pupil diameter.比较两种多次测量红外瞳孔计以确定暗视瞳孔直径。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 Nov;32(11):1926-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.07.019.
7
Monocular versus binocular pupillometry.单眼与双眼瞳孔测量法
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004 Dec;30(12):2551-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.05.025.
8
Comparison of dynamic digital pupillometry and static measurements of pupil size in determining scotopic pupil size before refractive surgery.比较动态数字瞳孔测量法和静态瞳孔大小测量法在屈光手术前确定暗适应瞳孔大小时的应用。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005 Jun;31(6):1171-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.10.049.
9
Comparison of refractive value and pupil size under monocular and binocular conditions between the Spot Vision Screener and binocular open-field autorefractor.单眼和双眼状态下,眼底照相机与双目开放式自动验光仪的屈光值和瞳孔大小比较。
Strabismus. 2020 Dec;28(4):186-193. doi: 10.1080/09273972.2020.1832542. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
10
Burst-shot infrared digital photography to determine scotopic pupil diameter.采用脉冲式红外数码摄影术测定暗视瞳孔直径。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 Dec;32(12):2113-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.06.039.

引用本文的文献

1
Suitability of open-field autorefractors as pupillometers and instrument design effects.开放式自动验光仪作为瞳孔计的适用性及仪器设计影响。
Int J Ophthalmol. 2017 Apr 18;10(4):567-572. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2017.04.11. eCollection 2017.