Suppr超能文献

不同步、收缩功能与心脏再同步治疗反应。

Dyssynchrony, contractile function, and response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

机构信息

Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

出版信息

Circ Heart Fail. 2011 Jul;4(4):433-40. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.111.962902. Epub 2011 May 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite benefits of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with severe but less symptomatic heart failure, approximately 30% of patients do not fully respond to treatment. We hypothesized that a combined assessment of left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony and contractile function by strain-based imaging would identify patients who would most benefit from CRT.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We studied 1077 patients with New York Heart Association class I/II, LV ejection fraction ≤30% and QRS width ≥130 ms enrolled in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy trial with sufficient echocardiographic image quality for cardiac deformation analysis (implantable cardioverter-defibrillator [ICD], n=416; CRT, n=661). Patients were assigned to CRT plus an ICD or to ICD alone in 3:2 random assignment. We assessed the degree to which baseline echocardiographic assessments of dyssynchrony, measured as the standard deviation of time-to-peak transverse strain over 12 segments, contractile function, measured as global longitudinal strain, or both predicted the effect of treatment on the primary outcome of death or heart failure. With 213 primary events occurring over a mean of 2.4 years, the benefit of CRT plus an ICD relative to ICD alone was greatest in patients with mild to moderate dyssynchrony (time-to-peak transverse strain standard deviation, 142 to 230 ms) and greater baseline contractile function (global longitudinal strain ≤-8.7%). Overall, those patients with mild to moderate dyssynchrony and those with best contractile function at baseline demonstrated the greatest benefit from CRT (adjusted hazards ratio, 0.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.09 to 0.44). Dyssynchrony and global longitudinal strain predicted response to CRT independent of each other, QRS width, LV ejection fraction, and presence versus absence of left bundle-branch block, although the observed benefit remained greatest in patients with left bundle-branch block.

CONCLUSIONS

Both mechanical dyssynchrony and contractile function are important independent correlates of benefit from CRT.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00180271.

摘要

背景

尽管心脏再同步治疗(CRT)可使严重但症状较轻的心力衰竭患者获益,但约 30%的患者对治疗无充分反应。我们假设,通过应变成像对左心室(LV)不同步和收缩功能进行综合评估,将确定哪些患者最受益于 CRT。

方法和结果

我们研究了 1077 例纽约心脏协会(NYHA)心功能 I/II 级、LV 射血分数≤30%和 QRS 宽度≥130ms 的患者,这些患者在 Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy 试验中具有足够的超声心动图图像质量进行心脏变形分析(植入式心脏复律除颤器 [ICD],n=416;CRT,n=661)。根据 3:2 的随机分配,患者被分配至 CRT 加 ICD 或 ICD 单独治疗。我们评估了基线超声心动图评估的不同步程度(以 12 节段的最大应变时间标准差表示)、收缩功能(以整体纵向应变表示)或两者对治疗主要结局(死亡或心力衰竭)的影响。在平均 2.4 年的随访中,213 例患者发生了主要终点事件,与 ICD 单独治疗相比,CRT 加 ICD 治疗对轻度至中度不同步(最大应变时间标准差 142 至 230ms)和基线收缩功能较好(整体纵向应变≤-8.7%)的患者的获益最大。总体而言,基线轻度至中度不同步和收缩功能最佳的患者从 CRT 中获益最大(调整后的危险比,0.20;95%置信区间,0.09 至 0.44)。不同步和整体纵向应变预测 CRT 的反应独立于彼此、QRS 宽度、LV 射血分数以及是否存在左束支传导阻滞,尽管观察到的获益在左束支传导阻滞患者中最大。

结论

机械不同步和收缩功能都是 CRT 获益的重要独立相关因素。

临床试验注册

网址:http://www.clinicaltrials.gov。唯一标识符:NCT00180271。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验