• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

致癌靶点、获益程度和抗肿瘤药物的市场定价。

Oncogenic targets, magnitude of benefit, and market pricing of antineoplastic drugs.

机构信息

Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Hospital, 610 University Ave, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M9, Canada.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jun 20;29(18):2543-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.35.2393. Epub 2011 May 23.

DOI:10.1200/JCO.2011.35.2393
PMID:21606435
Abstract

PURPOSE

The relationship between market pricing of new anticancer drugs and the magnitude of clinical benefit caused by them has not been reported.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that evaluated approved new agents for solid tumors by the U.S. Food and Drug administration since the year 2000 were assessed. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs were extracted for time-to-event end points described for each RCT. HRs were pooled for three groups: agents directed against a specific molecular target, for which the target population is selected by a biomarker (group A); less specific biologic targeted agents (group B); and chemotherapeutic agents (group C). Monthly market prices of these different drugs were compared.

RESULTS

For overall survival (OS), the pooled HR was 0.69 (95% CI, 0.59 to 0.81) for group A (six drugs, six trials); it was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.74 to 0.83) for group B (seven drugs, 14 trials); and it was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.79 to 0.90) for group C (eight drugs, 12 trials). For progression-free survival (PFS), the pooled HR was 0.42 (95% CI, 0.36 to 0.49) for group A (six drugs, seven trials); it was 0.57 (95% CI, 0.51 to 0.64) for group B (seven drugs, 14 trials); and it was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.66 to 0.85) for group C (six drugs, 10 trials). Tests for heterogeneity between subgroups were highly significant for PFS (P < .001) and OS (P = .02). The median monthly prices for standard doses of drugs were $5375 for group A, $5644 for group B, and $6584 for group C (P = .87).

CONCLUSION

New agents with specific molecular targets are clinically the most beneficial, but their monthly market prices are not significantly different from those of other anticancer agents.

摘要

目的

新抗癌药物的市场定价与其临床获益程度之间的关系尚未有报道。

患者和方法

评估了 2000 年以来美国食品和药物管理局批准的用于实体瘤的新药物的随机临床试验(RCT)。为每个 RCT 描述的时间事件终点提取了风险比(HR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。将 HR 汇总为三组:针对特定分子靶标的药物,其靶人群通过生物标志物选择(A 组);靶向治疗药物(B 组);和化疗药物(C 组)。比较了这些不同药物的每月市场价格。

结果

总生存期(OS)方面,A 组(6 种药物,6 项试验)的 HR 为 0.69(95%CI,0.59 至 0.81);B 组(7 种药物,14 项试验)为 0.78(95%CI,0.74 至 0.83);C 组(8 种药物,12 项试验)为 0.84(95%CI,0.79 至 0.90)。无进展生存期(PFS)方面,A 组(6 种药物,7 项试验)的 HR 为 0.42(95%CI,0.36 至 0.49);B 组(7 种药物,14 项试验)为 0.57(95%CI,0.51 至 0.64);C 组(6 种药物,10 项试验)为 0.75(95%CI,0.66 至 0.85)。亚组间异质性检验对 PFS(P<.001)和 OS(P=.02)均有显著意义。标准剂量药物的中位月价格为 A 组 5375 美元,B 组 5644 美元,C 组 6584 美元(P=.87)。

结论

具有特定分子靶点的新型药物在临床上最有益,但它们的每月市场价格与其他抗癌药物并无显著差异。

相似文献

1
Oncogenic targets, magnitude of benefit, and market pricing of antineoplastic drugs.致癌靶点、获益程度和抗肿瘤药物的市场定价。
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jun 20;29(18):2543-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.35.2393. Epub 2011 May 23.
2
Grouping of molecularly targeted anti-cancer agents based on cost-effectiveness analysis.基于成本效益分析的分子靶向抗癌药物分组
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2011 Nov;15(11):1355-6.
3
Multiple Dimensions of Value: Evaluative Frameworks for New Cancer Therapies.价值的多个维度:新型癌症疗法的评估框架
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Apr 20;34(12):1428-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.66.4201. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
4
[Evaluating the effectiveness of drugs. "The full potential of a therapy is often only clear after a number of years" (interview by Helmut Laschet)].评估药物的有效性。“一种疗法的全部潜力往往要经过数年才会明晰”(赫尔穆特·拉舍特访谈)
MMW Fortschr Med. 2010 Dec 16;152(51-52):10.
5
Era of personalized medicine may herald end of soaring cancer costs.个性化医疗时代可能预示着癌症治疗费用飙升时代的终结。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012 Jan 4;104(1):12-3, 16-7. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr536. Epub 2011 Dec 14.
6
Support for trials of promising medications through the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme. A proposal for a new authority category.通过药品福利计划支持有前景药物的试验。关于一个新管理类别的提议。
Med J Aust. 1995 Jan 2;162(1):33-6.
7
[Clinical studies in oncology--a challenge for clinical and academic pathology].[肿瘤学临床研究——临床与学术病理学面临的一项挑战]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2013 May;138(20):1073-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1343111. Epub 2013 May 13.
8
Incremental advance or seismic shift? The need to raise the bar of efficacy for drug approval.渐进式进步还是重大变革?提高药物审批效力标准的必要性。
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Dec 10;27(35):5868-73. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.4162. Epub 2009 Oct 13.
9
Accelerated approval seen as triumph and roadblock for cancer drugs.加速批准被视为抗癌药物的胜利与障碍。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Oct 20;96(20):1495-6. doi: 10.1093/jnci/96.20.1495.
10
Targeted immunotherapies overtaking emerging oncology market value based growth.基于市场价值增长,靶向免疫疗法正在超越新兴肿瘤学市场。
J BUON. 2015 Jan-Feb;20(1):350-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors of withdrawal of anticancer drug indications granted accelerated approval: a retrospective cohort study.获批加速批准的抗癌药物适应症撤销的预测因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 May 31;84:103088. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103088. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Integrating artificial intelligence in drug discovery and early drug development: a transformative approach.将人工智能整合到药物发现和早期药物开发中:一种变革性方法。
Biomark Res. 2025 Mar 14;13(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s40364-025-00758-2.
3
Genome-wide DNA methylation status is a predictor of the efficacy of anti-EGFR antibodies in the second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: Translational research of the EPIC trial.
全基因组 DNA 甲基化状态是预测转移性结直肠癌二线抗 EGFR 抗体治疗疗效的标志物:EPIC 试验的转化研究。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2024 Jun 11;39(1):89. doi: 10.1007/s00384-024-04659-y.
4
Clinical Value of Molecular Targets and FDA-Approved Genome-Targeted Cancer Therapies.分子靶点的临床价值和美国食品药品监督管理局批准的基于基因组的癌症治疗药物。
JAMA Oncol. 2024 May 1;10(5):634-641. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0194.
5
A modified MethyLight assay predicts the clinical outcomes of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer.改良的 MethyLight 分析预测转移性结直肠癌抗表皮生长因子受体治疗的临床结局。
Cancer Sci. 2022 Mar;113(3):1057-1068. doi: 10.1111/cas.15252. Epub 2022 Jan 28.
6
Efficacy, safety and tolerability of drugs studied in phase 3 randomized controlled trials in solid tumors over the last decade.过去十年中,在实体瘤的 3 期随机对照临床试验中研究药物的疗效、安全性和耐受性。
Sci Rep. 2021 May 25;11(1):10843. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90403-3.
7
Association Between Clinical Value and Financial Cost of Cancer Treatments: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.癌症治疗的临床价值与经济成本的关联:一项横断面分析。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2020 Oct 1;18(10):1349-1353. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.7574. Print 2020 Oct.
8
Lapatinib Activates the Kelch-Like ECH-Associated Protein 1-Nuclear Factor Erythroid 2-Related Factor 2 Pathway in HepG2 Cells.拉帕替尼激活HepG2细胞中的 Kelch样ECH相关蛋白1-核因子红细胞2相关因子2通路。
Front Pharmacol. 2020 Jun 30;11:944. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00944. eCollection 2020.
9
Anticancer drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration for gastrointestinal malignancies: Clinical benefit and price considerations.美国食品和药物管理局批准用于胃肠道恶性肿瘤的抗癌药物:临床获益和价格考虑。
Cancer Med. 2019 Apr;8(4):1584-1593. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2058. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
10
Checkpoint Inhibitors, Palliative Care, or Hospice.免疫检查点抑制剂、姑息治疗或临终关怀。
Curr Oncol Rep. 2018 Jan 19;20(1):2. doi: 10.1007/s11912-018-0659-0.