• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伦敦塔测验:传统统计学方法与基于人工神经网络建模在鉴别额颞叶痴呆与阿尔茨海默病中的比较。

Tower of London test: a comparison between conventional statistic approach and modelling based on artificial neural network in differentiating fronto-temporal dementia from Alzheimer's disease.

机构信息

Neurology department, Multimedica Santa Maria, Castellanza, Italy.

出版信息

Behav Neurol. 2011;24(2):149-58. doi: 10.3233/BEN-2011-0327.

DOI:10.3233/BEN-2011-0327
PMID:21606576
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5377991/
Abstract

The early differentiation of Alzheimer's disease (AD) from frontotemporal dementia (FTD) may be difficult. The Tower of London (ToL), thought to assess executive functions such as planning and visuo-spatial working memory, could help in this purpose. Twentytwo Dementia Centers consecutively recruited patients with early FTD or AD. ToL performances of these groups were analyzed using both the conventional statistical approaches and the Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) modelling. Ninety-four non aphasic FTD and 160 AD patients were recruited. ToL Accuracy Score (AS) significantly (p < 0.05) differentiated FTD from AD patients. However, the discriminant validity of AS checked by ROC curve analysis, yielded no significant results in terms of sensitivity and specificity (AUC 0.63). The performances of the 12 Success Subscores (SS) together with age, gender and schooling years were entered into advanced ANNs developed by Semeion Institute. The best ANNs were selected and submitted to ROC curves. The non-linear model was able to discriminate FTD from AD with an average AUC for 7 independent trials of 0.82. The use of hidden information contained in the different items of ToL and the non linear processing of the data through ANNs allows a high discrimination between FTD and AD in individual patients.

摘要

阿尔茨海默病(AD)与额颞叶痴呆(FTD)的早期鉴别可能较为困难。伦敦塔测验(ToL)被认为可以评估执行功能,如计划和视空间工作记忆,可有助于进行鉴别。22 家痴呆症中心连续招募了早期 FTD 或 AD 患者。使用传统统计学方法和人工神经网络(ANNs)建模对这些组的 ToL 表现进行了分析。共招募了 94 名非失语性 FTD 和 160 名 AD 患者。ToL 准确性得分(AS)显著(p < 0.05)区分了 FTD 和 AD 患者。然而,ROC 曲线分析检查的 AS 判别有效性在灵敏度和特异性方面没有显著结果(AUC 为 0.63)。将 12 个成功子分数(SS)的表现以及年龄、性别和受教育年限一起输入 Semeion 研究所开发的高级 ANNs。选择最佳的 ANN 并提交给 ROC 曲线。非线性模型能够以平均 AUC 为 0.82 的 7 次独立试验区分 FTD 和 AD。通过使用 ToL 不同项目中包含的隐藏信息和通过 ANNs 对数据进行非线性处理,可以在个体患者中实现 FTD 和 AD 的高鉴别。

相似文献

1
Tower of London test: a comparison between conventional statistic approach and modelling based on artificial neural network in differentiating fronto-temporal dementia from Alzheimer's disease.伦敦塔测验:传统统计学方法与基于人工神经网络建模在鉴别额颞叶痴呆与阿尔茨海默病中的比较。
Behav Neurol. 2011;24(2):149-58. doi: 10.3233/BEN-2011-0327.
2
Cognitive and Behavioral Profiles of Left and Right Semantic Dementia: Differential Diagnosis with Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia and Alzheimer's Disease.左右侧语义性痴呆的认知与行为特征:与行为变异型额颞叶痴呆及阿尔茨海默病的鉴别诊断
J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;72(4):1129-1144. doi: 10.3233/JAD-190877.
3
Neuropsychological Testing in Pathologically Verified Alzheimer Disease and Frontotemporal Dementia: How Well Do the Uniform Data Set Measures Differentiate Between Diseases?经病理证实的阿尔茨海默病和额颞叶痴呆的神经心理学测试:统一数据集测量在区分疾病方面的效果如何?
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2017 Jul-Sep;31(3):187-191. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0000000000000181.
4
[DEX and executive dysfunction in activities of daily living in Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia].[右美托咪定与阿尔茨海默病和额颞叶痴呆日常生活活动中的执行功能障碍]
Psychol Neuropsychiatr Vieil. 2010 Sep;8(3):215-24; quiz 225-7. doi: 10.1684/pnv.2010.0220.
5
Alzheimer's disease and frontal variant of frontotemporal dementia-- a very brief battery for cognitive and behavioural distinction.阿尔茨海默病与额颞叶痴呆的额叶变异型——一种用于认知和行为鉴别的简短测试组合
J Neurol. 2005 Oct;252(10):1238-44. doi: 10.1007/s00415-005-0849-1. Epub 2005 May 23.
6
Combined Socio-Behavioral Evaluation Improves the Differential Diagnosis Between the Behavioral Variant of Frontotemporal Dementia and Alzheimer's Disease: In Search of Neuropsychological Markers.联合社会行为评估可提高行为变异型额颞叶痴呆与阿尔茨海默病的鉴别诊断:寻找神经心理学标志物。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;61(2):761-772. doi: 10.3233/JAD-170650.
7
Comprehensive Clinical Evaluations of Frontotemporal Dementia Contrasting to Alzheimer's Disease (oFTD Study).额颞叶痴呆与阿尔茨海默病对比的综合临床评估(oFTD研究)
J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;48(1):279-86. doi: 10.3233/JAD-150416.
8
Comparisons of clinical symptoms in biomarker-confirmed Alzheimer's disease, dementia with Lewy bodies, and frontotemporal dementia patients in a local memory clinic.当地记忆诊所中生物标志物确诊的阿尔茨海默病、路易体痴呆和额颞叶痴呆患者临床症状的比较。
Psychogeriatrics. 2015 Dec;15(4):235-41. doi: 10.1111/psyg.12103. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
9
Early-stage differentiation between presenile Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia using arterial spin labeling MRI.利用动脉自旋标记磁共振成像技术对早老性阿尔茨海默病和额颞叶痴呆进行早期鉴别
Eur Radiol. 2016 Jan;26(1):244-53. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3789-x. Epub 2015 May 31.
10
A short neuropsychologic and cognitive evaluation of frontotemporal dementia.额颞叶痴呆的简短神经心理学和认知评估
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2009 Apr;111(3):251-5. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2008.10.012. Epub 2008 Dec 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Alzheimer's Disease or Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia? Review of Key Points Toward an Accurate Clinical and Neuropsychological Diagnosis.阿尔茨海默病还是行为变异额颞叶痴呆?临床和神经心理学诊断准确性相关要点综述。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2020;73(3):833-848. doi: 10.3233/JAD-190924.
2
Psychological and Cognitive Markers of Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia-A Clinical Neuropsychologist's View on Diagnostic Criteria and Beyond.行为变异型额颞叶痴呆的心理和认知标志物——一位临床神经心理学家对诊断标准及其他方面的看法
Front Neurol. 2019 Jun 7;10:594. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00594. eCollection 2019.
3
Apathy in Frontotemporal Degeneration: Neuroanatomical Evidence of Impaired Goal-directed Behavior.额颞叶变性中的冷漠:目标导向行为受损的神经解剖学证据。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Nov 10;9:611. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00611. eCollection 2015.
4
Back propagation artificial neural network for community Alzheimer's disease screening in China.反向传播人工神经网络在中国社区阿尔茨海默病筛查中的应用。
Neural Regen Res. 2013 Jan 25;8(3):270-6. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5374.2013.03.010.
5
Cognitive stimulation of executive functions in mild cognitive impairment: specific efficacy and impact in memory.轻度认知障碍中执行功能的认知刺激:对记忆的特定功效及影响
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2015 Mar;30(2):153-64. doi: 10.1177/1533317514539542. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
6
Differential diagnosis of degenerative dementias using basic neuropsychological tests: multivariable logistic regression analysis of 301 patients.使用基本神经心理学测试对退行性痴呆进行鉴别诊断:301例患者的多变量逻辑回归分析
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2014 Dec;29(8):723-31. doi: 10.1177/1533317514534954. Epub 2014 May 16.
7
Application of artificial neural networks to investigate one-carbon metabolism in Alzheimer's disease and healthy matched individuals.应用人工神经网络研究阿尔茨海默病患者和健康匹配个体的一碳代谢。
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 12;8(8):e74012. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074012. eCollection 2013.
8
Staging dementia from symptom profiles on a care partner website.通过护理伙伴网站上的症状概况对痴呆症进行分期。
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Aug 7;15(8):e145. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2461.
9
Differential patterns of planning impairments in Parkinson's disease and sub-clinical signs of dementia? A latent-class model-based approach.帕金森病中计划障碍的差异模式与痴呆的亚临床体征?一种基于潜在类别模型的方法。
PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e38855. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038855. Epub 2012 Jun 8.
10
Cognitive stimulation in a-MCI: an experimental study.轻度认知障碍的认知刺激:一项实验研究。
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2012 Mar;27(2):121-30. doi: 10.1177/1533317512441386.