• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

功能性运动筛查:预测军官候选人的损伤。

Functional movement screening: predicting injuries in officer candidates.

机构信息

Uniformed Services University, Consortium for Health and Military Performance, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.

出版信息

Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Dec;43(12):2224-30. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318223522d.

DOI:10.1249/MSS.0b013e318223522d
PMID:21606876
Abstract

PURPOSE

Functional movement screening (FMS) is a musculoskeletal assessment method that incorporates seven movements and yields an overall score based on movement quality. The objectives of this study were to document the distribution of scores and to determine whether FMS scores could predict injury in a large military cohort.

METHODS

A cohort of 874 Marine officer candidates were recruited, consented, completed demographic questionnaires, and had FMS performed during medical in-processing. Candidates were enrolled in either long-cycle (LC: 68 d; n = 427) or short-cycle (SC: 38 d; n = 447) training and followed up for injuries occurring in training.

RESULTS

The mean FMS score (score range = 0-21) among all candidates was 16.6 ± 1.7; approximately 10% of candidates had FMS scores ≤14. A score of ≤14 on the FMS predicted any injury with a sensitivity of 0.45 and a specificity of 0.71 and serious injury with a sensitivity of 0.12 and a specificity of 0.94. Both LC and SC cohorts demonstrated higher injury risk among candidates who had scores ≤14 compared with those with scores >14 (LC: risk ratio (RR) = 1.65, 95% confidence interval = 1.05-2.59, P = 0.03; SC: RR = 1.91, 95% confidence interval = 1.21-3.01, P < 0.01). Overall, 79.8% of persons with scores ≤14 were in the group with fitness scores <280 (/300), whereas only 6.6% of candidates in the group with fitness scores ≥280 had scores ≤14.

CONCLUSIONS

This was the first large-scale study performed in an active-duty military cohort to examine the utility of FMS during medical in-processing. Further work is warranted to evaluate FMS and the potential for injury prediction and prevention.

摘要

目的

功能性运动筛查(FMS)是一种肌肉骨骼评估方法,它包含 7 项运动,并根据运动质量得出总体得分。本研究的目的是记录分数分布,并确定 FMS 分数是否可以预测大型军事队列中的损伤。

方法

招募了 874 名海军陆战队军官候选人,他们在医疗体检中完成了人口统计学问卷并进行了 FMS 测试。候选人被分为长周期(LC:68d;n=427)或短周期(SC:38d;n=447)训练,并在训练中跟踪受伤情况。

结果

所有候选人的平均 FMS 得分为 16.6±1.7(得分范围为 0-21);约 10%的候选人的 FMS 得分≤14。FMS 得分≤14 预测任何损伤的敏感性为 0.45,特异性为 0.71,严重损伤的敏感性为 0.12,特异性为 0.94。LC 和 SC 队列中,FMS 得分≤14 的候选人的受伤风险均高于 FMS 得分>14 的候选人(LC:风险比(RR)=1.65,95%置信区间(CI)=1.05-2.59,P=0.03;SC:RR=1.91,95%置信区间=1.21-3.01,P<0.01)。总体而言,FMS 得分≤14 的人中有 79.8%的人的体能得分<280(/300),而体能得分≥280 的候选人中只有 6.6%的人的 FMS 得分≤14。

结论

这是首次在现役军事队列中进行的大规模研究,旨在检查 FMS 在医疗体检中的应用。需要进一步的工作来评估 FMS 以及预测和预防损伤的潜力。

相似文献

1
Functional movement screening: predicting injuries in officer candidates.功能性运动筛查:预测军官候选人的损伤。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Dec;43(12):2224-30. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318223522d.
2
Functional movement screen and aerobic fitness predict injuries in military training.功能性运动筛查和有氧适能可预测军事训练中的损伤。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013 Apr;45(4):636-43. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31827a1c4c.
3
Examining the association of injury with the Functional Movement Screen and Landing Error Scoring System in military recruits undergoing 16 weeks of introductory fitness training.检查新兵接受 16 周基础体能训练期间损伤与功能性运动筛查和落地错误评分系统的关联。
J Sci Med Sport. 2018 Jun;21(6):569-573. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.05.013. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
4
Factor structure of the functional movement screen in marine officer candidates.海军军官候选人功能性动作筛查的因子结构
J Strength Cond Res. 2014 Mar;28(3):672-8. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182a6dd83.
5
Efficacy of functional movement screening for predicting injuries in coast guard cadets.功能性动作筛查对预测海岸警卫队学员受伤情况的有效性。
J Strength Cond Res. 2015 May;29(5):1157-62. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000704.
6
The Functional Movement Screen: a reliability study.功能性运动筛查:可靠性研究。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Jun;42(6):530-40. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2012.3838. Epub 2012 May 14.
7
Functional Movement Screen: Pain versus composite score and injury risk.功能性动作筛查:疼痛与综合评分及损伤风险
J Sci Med Sport. 2017 Nov;20 Suppl 4:S40-S44. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
8
The Functional Movement Screen and Injury Risk: Association and Predictive Value in Active Men.功能性动作筛查与损伤风险:活跃男性中的关联性及预测价值
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Feb;44(2):297-304. doi: 10.1177/0363546515614815. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
9
Functional Movement Screen (FMS™) Scores and Demographics of US Army Pre-Ranger Candidates.美国陆军游骑兵候选者的功能性运动筛查(FMS™)评分和人口统计学数据。
Mil Med. 2020 Jun 8;185(5-6):e788-e794. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usz373.
10
Relationship between functional movement screening score and history of injury and identifying the predictive value of the FMS for injury.功能性动作筛查分数与损伤史之间的关系以及确定功能性动作筛查对损伤的预测价值。
Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2014;21(4):355-60. doi: 10.1080/17457300.2013.833942. Epub 2013 Sep 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictive Utility of the Functional Movement Screen and Y-Balance Test: Current Evidence and Future Directions.功能性动作筛查和Y平衡测试的预测效用:当前证据与未来方向
Sports (Basel). 2025 Feb 8;13(2):46. doi: 10.3390/sports13020046.
2
Pilot Study on the Relationship Between Different Lower Limb Raising Velocities and Trunk Muscle Contraction in Active Straight Leg Raise.主动直腿抬高时不同下肢抬高速度与躯干肌肉收缩关系的初步研究
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2024 Dec 18;9(4):276. doi: 10.3390/jfmk9040276.
3
The Effects of Torso-Borne Loads on Functional Movement Patterns.
躯干负荷对功能运动模式的影响。
Int J Exerc Sci. 2024 Jul 1;17(7):975-984. doi: 10.70252/HTJH7644. eCollection 2024.
4
Health and Wellness Characteristics of Employees Enrolled in a Workplace Wellness Study in the United Arab Emirates: A Descriptive Analysis of a Pilot Study.阿联酋一项职场健康研究中员工的健康与福祉特征:一项试点研究的描述性分析
Cureus. 2024 Jun 13;16(6):e62294. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62294. eCollection 2024 Jun.
5
Predicting functional movement capacity in adults: the effect of range of motion and isometric strength.预测成年人的功能性运动能力:关节活动范围和等长肌力的影响。
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2024 Jul 2;16(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s13102-024-00935-0.
6
Predictive Validity of Multifactorial Injury Risk Models and Associated Clinical Measures in the U.S. Population.美国人群中多因素损伤风险模型及相关临床指标的预测效度
Sports (Basel). 2024 Apr 28;12(5):123. doi: 10.3390/sports12050123.
7
Association between physical activity and functional movement screening among university students in an adaptive physical course.在适应性体育课程中,大学生的体力活动与功能性运动筛查之间的关联。
Technol Health Care. 2024;32(S1):135-144. doi: 10.3233/THC-248012.
8
Influence of Body Composition on Functional Movement Among Police Officers.身体成分对警察功能性运动的影响。
Int J Exerc Sci. 2024 Mar 1;17(4):418-428. doi: 10.70252/GECN7769. eCollection 2024.
9
Evaluation of the lower extremity functional test to predict lower limb injuries in professional male footballers.下肢功能测试评估对预测职业男性足球运动员下肢损伤的作用。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 31;14(1):2596. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-53223-9.
10
The Relationship Between Physical Mobility and Firefighter Occupational Task Performance.身体活动能力与消防员职业任务表现之间的关系
Int J Exerc Sci. 2023 Oct 1;16(3):1216-1227. doi: 10.70252/NUYZ9300. eCollection 2023.