Suppr超能文献

颈部冷却与热环境下的跑步表现:单次与重复使用的效果比较。

Neck cooling and running performance in the heat: single versus repeated application.

机构信息

Department of Life Sciences, Roehampton University, Whitelands College, London, UK.

出版信息

Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Dec;43(12):2388-95. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318222ef72.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of sustained neck cooling during time trial running in a hot environment.

METHODS

Seven nonacclimated, familiarized males completed three experimental 90-min preloaded time trials in the heat (30.4°C ± 0.1°C and 53% ± 2% relative humidity). During one of the trials, the, participants wore a cooling collar from the start (CC); in another, they wore a collar from the start which was replaced at 30-min intervals (CC(replaced)); and in the last trial, they wore no collar (NC). Participants ran for 75 min at 60% VO(2max) and then performed a 15-min time trial blinded from the distance ran. Distance ran, rectal temperature, neck skin temperature, HR, fluid loss and consumption, peripheral lactate, glucose, dopamine, serotonin and cortisol, RPE, thermal sensation, and feeling scales were recorded. Significance was set a priori at the P < 0.05 level.

RESULTS

Participants ran further in CC (2779 ± 299 m) compared with NC (2597 ± 291 m, P = 0.007; d = 0.67) and in CC(replaced) (2776 ± 331 m) compared with NC (P = 0.008; d = 0.62). There was no difference in the distance covered in CC compared with that in CC(replaced) (P = 0.998). The collar lowered neck temperature (P < 0.001) and the thermal sensation of the neck region (P < 0.001) but had no effect on any of the other physiological, endocrinological, or perceptual variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Cooling the surface of the neck improves time trial performance in a hot environment without altering physiological or neuroendocrinological responses. Maintenance of a lower neck temperature via the replacement of a CC has no additional benefit to an acute cooling intervention.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估在热环境中进行计时赛跑步时持续颈部冷却的效果。

方法

7 名未经适应、熟悉的男性在热环境中(30.4°C±0.1°C 和 53%±2%相对湿度)完成了三次实验性 90 分钟预加载计时赛。在其中一次试验中,参与者从一开始就佩戴冷却领(CC);在另一次试验中,他们从一开始就佩戴领,但每 30 分钟更换一次(CC(更换));在最后一次试验中,他们不戴领(NC)。参与者以 60%最大摄氧量(VO(2max))跑步 75 分钟,然后在距离未知的情况下进行 15 分钟计时赛。记录跑距、直肠温度、颈部皮肤温度、心率、液体损失和消耗、外周血乳酸、葡萄糖、多巴胺、血清素和皮质醇、RPE、热感觉和感觉量表。预设显著性水平为 P < 0.05。

结果

与 NC(2597±291 m,P = 0.007;d = 0.67)相比,CC(2779±299 m)参与者跑得更远,与 NC(2776±331 m)相比,CC(更换)参与者跑得更远(P = 0.008;d = 0.62)。CC 与 CC(更换)的跑距无差异(P = 0.998)。领降低了颈部温度(P < 0.001)和颈部区域的热感觉(P < 0.001),但对任何其他生理、内分泌或知觉变量均无影响。

结论

在热环境中冷却颈部表面可提高计时赛表现,而不会改变生理或神经内分泌反应。通过更换 CC 来维持较低的颈部温度对急性冷却干预没有额外的益处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验