Suppr超能文献

在热环境下运动恢复期间,冰背心而非单手冷却能有效减轻热生理应激。

An Ice Vest, but Not Single-Hand Cooling, Is Effective at Reducing Thermo-Physiological Strain During Exercise Recovery in the Heat.

作者信息

Seeley Afton D, Sherman Ross A

机构信息

Department of Human Performance and Health Education, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI, United States.

Thermal and Mountain Medicine Division, US Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Natick, MA, United States.

出版信息

Front Sports Act Living. 2021 Apr 29;3:660910. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2021.660910. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Sports limit the length of breaks between halves or periods, placing substantial time constraints on cooling effectiveness. This study investigated the effect of active cooling during both time-limited and prolonged post-exercise recovery in the heat. Ten recreationally-active adults (VO 43.6 ± 7.5 ml·kg·min) were exposed to thermally-challenging conditions (36°C air temperature, 45% RH) while passively seated for 30 min, cycling for 60 min at 51% VO, and during a seated recovery for 60 min that was broken into two epochs: first 15 min (REC) and total 60 min (REC). Three different cooling techniques were implemented during independent recovery trials: (a) negative-pressure single hand-cooling (~17°C); (b) ice vest; and (c) non-cooling control. Change in rectal temperature ( ), mean skin temperature ( ), heart rate (HR), and thermal sensation (TS), as well as mean body temperature ( ), and heat storage () were calculated for exercise, REC and REC. During REC, HR was lowered more with the ice vest (-9 [-15 to -3] bts·min, = 0.002) and single hand-cooling (-7 [-13 to -1] bts·min, = 0.021) compared to a non-cooling control. The ice vest caused a greater change in compared to no cooling (-1.07 [-2.00 to -0.13]°C, = 0.021) and single-hand cooling (-1.07 [-2.01 to -0.14]°C, = 0.020), as well as a greater change in compared to no cooling (-84 [-132 to -37] W, < 0.0001) and single-hand cooling (-74 [-125 to -24] W, = 0.002). Across REC, changes in (-0.38 [-0.69 to -0.07]°C, = 0.012) and (-1.62 [-2.56 to -0.68]°C, < 0.0001) were greater with ice vest compared to no cooling. Furthermore, changes in in (-0.39 [-0.70 to -0.08]°C, = 0.010) and (-1.68 [-2.61 to -0.74]°C, < 0.0001) were greater with the ice vest compared to single-hand cooling. Using an ice vest during time-limited and prolonged recovery in the heat aided in a more effective reduction in thermo-physiological strain compared to both passive cooling as well as a single-hand cooling device.

摘要

体育运动限制了半场或各时段之间的休息时长,对降温效果造成了很大的时间限制。本研究调查了在限时和延长的热环境运动后恢复期间主动降温的效果。十名有休闲运动习惯的成年人(VO₂max为43.6±7.5毫升·千克·分钟⁻¹)在热环境挑战条件下(气温36°C,相对湿度45%)被动就座30分钟,以51%VO₂max的强度骑行60分钟,然后在就座恢复60分钟期间分为两个阶段:前15分钟(REC₁)和总共60分钟(REC₂)。在独立的恢复试验中实施了三种不同的降温技术:(a)负压单手冷却(约17°C);(b)冰背心;(c)非冷却对照。计算了运动期间、REC₁和REC₂期间直肠温度(Tre)、平均皮肤温度(Tsk)、心率(HR)和热感觉(TS)的变化,以及平均体温(Tb)和蓄热(HS)。在REC₁期间,与非冷却对照相比,冰背心(-9[-15至-3]次·分钟⁻¹,P = (此处原文有误,推测为p = 0.002))和单手冷却(-7[-13至-1]次·分钟⁻¹,P = 0.021)使HR下降更多。与无冷却相比,冰背心使Tre变化更大(-1.0

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7cc/8117958/044020f46aac/fspor-03-660910-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验