Yalçin H, Karayalçin B, Boz A, Talay B, Belgi A, Yalçin F
Hippokratia. 2011 Jan;15(1):64-8.
Hypertension (HT) is a growing health problem in the population and associated with increased cardiovascular event risk and mortality. In hypertensive patients, progressive left ventricular (LV) contractility deterioration is detectable by gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion scintigraphy9. We planned this study to explore the agreement in ejection fraction (EF) determination between 2 dimensional echocardiography and gated SPECT analysis in selected group of patients with hypertension.
We studied 26 consecutive patients (mean age 56.5 ± 8.8 years; 6 men) with hypertension. Quantitative contractility analysis by both echocardiography and SPECT at rest was performed to investigate the agreement between two diagnostic tests.
EF at rest was greater than 55 % in all patients. All patients had a clinical presentation of atypical chest pain. Therefore, in addition to quantitative contractility analysis at rest by echocardiography and myocardial SPECT perfusion scintigraphy, we examined ischemia by stress induction and determined that 10 patients had ischemic finding (38.4 %). The mean value of EF calculated by echocardiography was 67.5 ± 5.7 %, while EF by gated SPECT was 72.8 ± 8.5 %. We documented an acceptable agreement in EF determination between these 2 diagnostic tests by meaningful correlation (r = 0.556, p = 0.003). There was no regional contractility deterioration despite existence of ischemia in 10 patients of the study group.
We observed that both echocardiography and gated SPECT can be used for quantification of EF in the hypertensive patients with an acceptable agreement.
高血压是人群中日益严重的健康问题,与心血管事件风险增加和死亡率相关。在高血压患者中,通过门控单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)心肌灌注显像可检测到左心室(LV)收缩功能逐渐恶化。我们开展本研究以探讨在特定高血压患者组中二维超声心动图和门控SPECT分析在射血分数(EF)测定方面的一致性。
我们研究了26例连续的高血压患者(平均年龄56.5±8.8岁;6例男性)。通过超声心动图和静息状态下的SPECT进行定量收缩功能分析,以研究两种诊断测试之间的一致性。
所有患者静息时的EF均大于55%。所有患者均有非典型胸痛的临床表现。因此,除了通过超声心动图和心肌SPECT灌注显像进行静息状态下的定量收缩功能分析外,我们还通过诱发应激来检查缺血情况,确定10例患者有缺血表现(38.4%)。超声心动图计算的EF平均值为67.5±5.7%,而门控SPECT计算的EF为72.8±8.5%。通过有意义的相关性(r = 0.556,p = 0.003),我们证明这两种诊断测试在EF测定方面具有可接受的一致性。尽管研究组中有10例患者存在缺血,但未发现局部收缩功能恶化。
我们观察到超声心动图和门控SPECT均可用于高血压患者EF的定量分析,且一致性可接受。