Department for Traumatology and Sports Injuries, Paracelsus Medical University, Muellner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.
Eur Spine J. 2011 Sep;20(9):1441-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1846-y. Epub 2011 May 24.
In the elderly population, reported union rates with anterior odontoid screw fixation (AOSF) for odontoid fracture (OF) treatment vary between 23 and 93% when using plain radiographs. However, recent research revealed poor interobserver reliability for fusion assessment using plain radiographs compared to CT scans. Therefore, union rates in patients aged ≥60 years treated with AOSF have to be revisited using CT scans and factors for non-union to be analysed. Prospectively gathered consecutively treated patients using AOSF for odontoid fracture with age ≥60 years were reviewed. Medical charts were assessed for demographics, clinical outcomes and complications. Patients' preoperative radiographs and CT scans were analysed to characterize fracture morphology and type, fracture displacement, presence of atlanto-dental osteoarthritis as well as a detailed morphometric assessment of fracture surfaces (in mm(2)). CT scans performed after a minimum of 3 months postoperatively were analysed for fracture union. Those patients not showing CT-based evidence of completely fused odontoid fracture were invited for radiographic follow-up at a minimum of 6 months follow-up. Follow-up CT-scan were studied for odontoid union as well as the number of screws used and the square surface of screws used for AOSF and the related corticocancellous osseous healing surface of the odontoid fragment (in %) were calculated. Patients were stratified whether they achieved osseous union or fibrous non-union. Patients with a non-union were subjected to flexion-extension lateral radiographs and the non-union defined as stable if no motion was detected. The sample included 13 male (72%) and 5 female (18%) patients. The interval from injury to AOSF was 4.1 ± 5.3 days (0-16 days). Age at injury was 78.1 ± 7.6 years (60-87 years) and follow-up was 75.7 ± 50.8 months (4.2-150.2 months). 10 patients had dislocated fractures, 14 had Type II and 4 "shallow" Type III fractures according to the Anderson classification, 2 had stable C1-ring fractures, 8 had displayed atlanto-dental osteoarthritis. Fracture square surface was 127.1 ± 50.9 mm(2) (56.3-215.9 mm(2)) and osseous healing surface was 84.0 ± 6.8% (67.6-91.1%). CT-based analysis revealed osseous union in 9 (50%) and non-union in 9 patients (50%). Union rates correlated with increased fracture surface (P = 0.02). Statistical analysis revealed a trend that the usage of two screws with AOSF correlates with increased fusion rates (P = 0.06). Stability at C1-2 was achieved in 89% of patients. CT scans are accepted as the standard of reference to assess osseous union. The current study offers an objective insight into the union rates of odontoid fractures treated with AOSF using CT scans in consecutive series of 18 patients ≥60 years. Literature serves evidence that elderly patients with unstable OF benefit from early surgical stabilization. However, although using AOSF for unstable OF yields segmental stability at C1-2 in a high number of patients as echoed in the current study, our analysis stressed that using follow-up CT scans in comparison to biplanar radiographs dramatically reduces osseous union rates compared to those previously reported for AOSF.
在老年人群中,使用普通 X 线片报告的齿状突骨折(odontoid fracture,OF)治疗中使用前路齿状突螺钉固定(anterior odontoid screw fixation,AOSF)的联合率在 23%至 93%之间。然而,最近的研究表明,与 CT 扫描相比,普通 X 线片在融合评估方面的观察者间可靠性较差。因此,使用 CT 扫描重新评估≥60 岁患者使用 AOSF 治疗的联合率,并分析非联合的因素。前瞻性收集了≥60 岁、使用 AOSF 治疗齿状突骨折的连续治疗患者。评估了病历、临床结果和并发症。分析了患者术前 X 线片和 CT 扫描,以描述骨折形态和类型、骨折移位、寰齿关节炎的存在以及骨折表面的详细形态计量评估(mm²)。对至少术后 3 个月的患者进行 CT 扫描分析以评估骨折愈合。对于那些没有 CT 证据显示完全融合的齿状突骨折的患者,邀请他们在至少 6 个月的随访时进行影像学随访。研究了随访 CT 扫描的齿状突联合情况、使用的螺钉数量以及用于 AOSF 的螺钉的方形表面和齿状突骨折块的皮质骨松质骨愈合表面(%)。患者分为骨愈合或纤维性非愈合。对非愈合患者进行屈伸侧位 X 线片检查,如果未发现运动,则将非愈合定义为稳定。样本包括 13 名男性(72%)和 5 名女性(18%)患者。从受伤到 AOSF 的时间间隔为 4.1±5.3 天(0-16 天)。受伤时的年龄为 78.1±7.6 岁(60-87 岁),随访时间为 75.7±50.8 个月(4.2-150.2 个月)。10 例为脱位骨折,14 例为安德森分类的Ⅱ型,4 例为“浅”Ⅲ型骨折,2 例为稳定的 C1 环骨折,8 例显示寰齿关节炎。骨折面积为 127.1±50.9mm²(56.3-215.9mm²),骨愈合面积为 84.0±6.8%(67.6-91.1%)。CT 分析显示 9 例(50%)为骨愈合,9 例(50%)为非愈合。联合率与骨折面积增加相关(P=0.02)。统计学分析显示,AOSF 中使用两个螺钉与增加融合率呈趋势相关(P=0.06)。89%的患者在 C1-2 达到了稳定性。CT 扫描被认为是评估骨愈合的标准。本研究连续 18 例≥60 岁患者使用 CT 扫描评估 AOSF 治疗的骨愈合率,提供了客观的见解。文献表明,不稳定 OF 的老年患者受益于早期手术稳定。然而,尽管使用 AOSF 治疗不稳定 OF 在当前研究中也能在很大程度上在 C1-2 获得节段稳定性,但我们的分析强调,与双平面 X 线片相比,使用随访 CT 扫描会显著降低骨愈合率,与之前报道的 AOSF 相比。