• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

测量校车内的排气管和曲柄箱中的 PM:一种新的双示踪剂方法。

Measuring in-cabin school bus tailpipe and crankcase PM: a new dual tracer method.

机构信息

Air Quality Management Consulting, Greenbrae, CA 94904-1135, USA.

出版信息

J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2011 May;61(5):494-503. doi: 10.3155/1047-3289.61.5.494.

DOI:10.3155/1047-3289.61.5.494
PMID:21608489
Abstract

Exposures of occupants in school buses to on-road vehicle emissions, including emissions from the bus itself, can be substantially greater than those in outdoor settings. A dual tracer method was developed and applied to two school buses in Seattle in 2005 to quantify in-cabin fine particulate matter (PM2.5) concentrations attributable to the buses' diesel engine tailpipe (DPMtp) and crankcase vent (PMck) emissions. The new method avoids the problem of differentiating bus emissions from chemically identical emissions of other vehicles by using a fuel-based organometallic iridium tracer for engine exhaust and by adding deuterated hexatriacontane to engine oil. Source testing results showed consistent PM:tracer ratios for the primary tracer for each type of emissions. Comparisons of the PM:tracer ratios indicated that there was a small amount of unburned lubricating oil emitted from the tailpipe; however, virtually no diesel fuel combustion products were found in the crankcase emissions. For the limited testing conducted here, although PMck emission rates (averages of 0.028 and 0.099 g/km for the two buses) were lower than those from the tailpipe (0.18 and 0.14 g/km), in-cabin PMck concentrations averaging 6.8 microg/m3 were higher than DPMtp (0.91 microg/m3 average). In-cabin DPMtp and PMck concentrations were significantly higher with bus windows closed (1.4 and 12 microg/m3, respectively) as compared with open (0.44 and 1.3 microg/m3, respectively). For comparison, average closed- and open-window in-cabin total PM2.5 concentrations were 26 and 12 microg/m3, respectively. Despite the relatively short in-cabin sampling times, very high sensitivities were achieved, with detection limits of 0.002 microg/m3 for DPMtp and 0.05 microg/m3 for PMck.

摘要

校车乘客暴露于道路车辆排放物(包括来自校车本身的排放物)的程度,大大高于户外环境。2005 年,在西雅图两辆校车上应用双示踪剂方法,量化了归因于公交车柴油机排气管(DPMtp)和曲轴箱通风(PMck)排放的机舱内细颗粒物(PM2.5)浓度。该新方法通过使用基于燃料的有机金属铱示踪剂测量发动机排气,并向发动机机油中添加氘代三十六烷来避免区分公交车排放物与其他车辆化学性质相同的排放物的问题。源测试结果显示,每种排放物的主要示踪剂的 PM:示踪剂比值都保持一致。PM:示踪剂比值的比较表明,从排气管中排放了少量未燃烧的润滑油;但是,在曲轴箱排放物中几乎没有发现柴油燃料燃烧产物。就这里进行的有限测试而言,尽管 PMck 排放率(两辆校车的平均值分别为 0.028 和 0.099 g/km)低于排气管(0.18 和 0.14 g/km),但机舱内 PMck 浓度平均值为 6.8μg/m3 高于 DPMtp(平均值为 0.91μg/m3)。与车窗打开时(分别为 0.44 和 1.3μg/m3)相比,车窗关闭时(分别为 1.4 和 12μg/m3),机舱内 DPMtp 和 PMck 浓度明显更高。相比之下,关闭和打开车窗时,机舱内总 PM2.5 浓度的平均值分别为 26 和 12μg/m3。尽管车内采样时间相对较短,但仍实现了非常高的灵敏度,DPMtp 的检测限为 0.002μg/m3,PMck 的检测限为 0.05μg/m3。

相似文献

1
Measuring in-cabin school bus tailpipe and crankcase PM: a new dual tracer method.测量校车内的排气管和曲柄箱中的 PM:一种新的双示踪剂方法。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2011 May;61(5):494-503. doi: 10.3155/1047-3289.61.5.494.
2
Characterizing ultrafine particles and other air pollutants in and around school buses.对校车内部及周围的超细颗粒物和其他空气污染物进行特征分析。
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2014 Mar(180):3-37.
3
Detailed characterization and profiles of crankcase and diesel particulate matter exhaust emissions using speciated organics.使用特定有机物对曲轴箱和柴油机颗粒物废气排放进行详细表征和剖析。
Environ Sci Technol. 2008 Aug 1;42(15):5661-6. doi: 10.1021/es703065h.
4
Performance of school bus retrofit systems: ultrafine particles and other vehicular pollutants.校车改装系统的性能:超细颗粒和其他车辆污染物。
Environ Sci Technol. 2011 Aug 1;45(15):6475-82. doi: 10.1021/es201070t. Epub 2011 Jul 8.
5
In-use fuel economy of hybrid-electric school buses in Iowa.爱荷华州混合动力校车的使用燃料经济性。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2011 May;61(5):504-10. doi: 10.3155/1047-3289.61.5.504.
6
Evaluation of a high efficiency cabin air (HECA) filtration system for reducing particulate pollutants inside school buses.评估高效客车舱空气(HECA)过滤系统对减少校车内部颗粒物污染物的效果。
Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Mar 17;49(6):3358-65. doi: 10.1021/es505419m. Epub 2015 Mar 2.
7
Personal and ambient exposures to air toxics in Camden, New Jersey.新泽西州卡姆登市个人及周围环境中的空气有毒物质暴露情况。
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2011 Aug(160):3-127; discussion 129-51.
8
Studies of self-pollution in diesel school buses: methodological issues.柴油校车自污染的研究:方法学问题。
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2007 Sep;4(9):660-8. doi: 10.1080/15459620701501578.
9
Characterizing the range of children's air pollutant exposure during school bus commutes.确定儿童在校车通勤期间接触空气污染物的范围。
J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 2005 Sep;15(5):377-87. doi: 10.1038/sj.jea.7500414.
10
Quantification of Self Pollution from Two Diesel School Buses using Three Independent Methods.使用三种独立方法对两辆柴油校车的自身污染进行量化。
Atmos Environ (1994). 2010 Sep 1;44(28):3422-3431. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.06.005.

引用本文的文献

1
Adopting electric school buses in the United States: Health and climate benefits.美国采用电动校车:健康和气候效益。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 May 28;121(22):e2320338121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2320338121. Epub 2024 May 20.
2
Comparison of PM Exposure in Hazy and Non-Hazy Days in Nanjing, China.中国南京雾霾天与非雾霾天的颗粒物暴露比较。
Aerosol Air Qual Res. 2017 Sep;17(9):2235-2246. doi: 10.4209/aaqr.2016.07.0301.