血管外科学会关于颈动脉介入治疗的报告标准。 - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

Reporting standards for carotid interventions from the Society for Vascular Surgery.

作者信息

Timaran Carlos H, McKinsey James F, Schneider Peter A, Littooy Fred

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, TX, USA.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2011 Jun;53(6):1679-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.11.122.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2010.11.122

PMID:21609800

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

Reporting standards for carotid interventions from the Society for Vascular Surgery.血管外科学会关于颈动脉介入治疗的报告标准。

J Vasc Surg. 2011 Jun;53(6):1679-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.11.122.

SPACE and EVA-3S trials: the need of standards for carotid stenting.SPACE和EVA - 3S试验：颈动脉支架置入术标准的必要性。

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007 Jan;33(1):48-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2006.11.003. Epub 2006 Nov 22.

Data quality of surgery for carotid artery stenosis. Are the national vascular registries reliable?颈动脉狭窄手术的数据质量。国家血管登记处可靠吗？

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2006 Apr;31(4):381-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2005.11.014. Epub 2006 Jan 4.

An evolution in thinking from modern carotid registries: CAS and CEA will be complimentary and not competitive techniques.现代颈动脉登记研究带来的思维转变：颈动脉支架置入术（CAS）和颈动脉内膜切除术（CEA）将成为互补而非相互竞争的技术。

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Mar 1;75(4):526-7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22482.

Carotid endarterectomy was performed with lower stroke and death rates than carotid artery stenting in the United States in 2003 and 2004.2003年和2004年在美国，颈动脉内膜切除术的实施带来的中风和死亡率低于颈动脉支架置入术。

J Vasc Surg. 2007 Dec;46(6):1112-1118. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.08.030.

Regarding "Risk-adjusted 30-day outcomes of carotid stenting and endarterectomy: results from the SVS Vascular Registry".关于“颈动脉支架置入术和动脉内膜切除术的风险调整30天结局：来自血管外科学会血管注册研究的结果”。

J Vasc Surg. 2009 Aug;50(2):475; author reply 475-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.04.018.

Regarding "stroke and death after carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting with and without high risk criteria".关于“有和没有高危标准的颈动脉内膜切除术及颈动脉支架置入术后的卒中与死亡情况”

J Vasc Surg. 2011 Jul;54(1):284; author reply 284-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.01.081.

Commentary on "a review of the trials comparing carotid endarterectomy and carotid angioplasty and stenting".关于“比较颈动脉内膜切除术与颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术的试验综述”的评论

Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther. 2008 Sep;20(3):309-10. doi: 10.1177/1531003508325409.

Commentary on "Carotid interventions in acute stroke".关于“急性卒中的颈动脉干预”的评论

Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther. 2010 Mar;22(1):58-9. doi: 10.1177/1531003510381520.

Overtreatment or Undertreatment of Carotid Disease: A Transatlantic Comparison of Carotid Endarterectomy Patient Cohorts.颈动脉疾病的过度治疗或治疗不足：颈动脉内膜切除术患者队列的跨大西洋比较

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 Apr;11(4):e004607. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.004607.

引用本文的文献

Usefulness of intravascular pressure ratio measurement for cerebral hemodynamics in carotid artery stenting patients.血管内压力比测量对颈动脉支架置入患者脑血流动力学的有用性。

Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 14;15(1):29874. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-15939-0.

Urgent/emergent carotid revascularization is associated with an increase in stroke and mortality.紧急/急诊颈动脉血运重建与中风和死亡率增加相关。

J Vasc Surg. 2025 Jul 10. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2025.07.005.

Predictors of postoperative stroke after transfemoral carotid artery stenting.经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术后卒中的预测因素

J Vasc Surg. 2025 Jun 25. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2025.06.023.

Investigation of the hyperperfusion phenomenon following carotid artery stenting using preoperative computed tomography perfusion imaging.使用术前计算机断层扫描灌注成像技术对颈动脉支架置入术后的高灌注现象进行研究。

Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2025 May 26;167(1):155. doi: 10.1007/s00701-025-06545-0.

Medium-term restenosis after carotid endarterectomy by patch type: a single-centre retrospective study comparing biological with synthetic patch materials.根据补片类型分析颈动脉内膜切除术后的中期再狭窄：一项比较生物补片材料与合成补片材料的单中心回顾性研究

Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2025 Sep;107(7):495-502. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2024.0097. Epub 2025 Apr 3.

External validity of randomized clinical trials in vascular surgery: systematic review of demographic factors of patients recruited to randomized clinical trials with comparison to the National Vascular Registry.血管外科随机临床试验的外部效度：对随机临床试验招募患者的人口统计学因素与国家血管登记处进行比较的系统评价

BJS Open. 2025 Mar 4;9(2). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae156.

Seven years of the transcarotid artery revascularization surveillance project, comparison to transfemoral stenting and endarterectomy.经颈动脉血运重建监测项目七年，与经股动脉支架置入术和内膜切除术的比较。

J Vasc Surg. 2024 Nov;80(5):1455-1463. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.05.048. Epub 2024 May 29.

Redefining postoperative hypertension management in carotid surgery: a comprehensive analysis of blood pressure homeostasis and hyperperfusion syndrome in unilateral vs. bilateral carotid surgeries and implications for clinical practice.重新定义颈动脉手术中的术后高血压管理：对单侧与双侧颈动脉手术中血压稳态和高灌注综合征的综合分析及其对临床实践的意义。

Front Surg. 2024 Apr 4;11:1361963. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1361963. eCollection 2024.

Open Retrograde Stenting of Proximal Innominate and Common Carotid Artery Stenosis.近端无名动脉和颈总动脉狭窄的开放逆行支架置入术。

J Pers Med. 2024 Feb 20;14(3):223. doi: 10.3390/jpm14030223.

Short term outcomes of carotid surgery: the real-world experience of a single teaching center.颈动脉手术的短期疗效：单一教学中心的真实世界经验。

J Vasc Bras. 2024 Feb 5;23:e20230033. doi: 10.1590/1677-5449.202300332. eCollection 2024.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验