Suppr超能文献

口服与鼓室内皮质类固醇治疗特发性突发性聋的随机试验。

Oral vs intratympanic corticosteroid therapy for idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss: a randomized trial.

机构信息

Department of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, 243 Charles St, Boston, MA 02114, USA.

出版信息

JAMA. 2011 May 25;305(20):2071-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.679.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss has been treated with oral corticosteroids for more than 30 years. Recently, many patients' symptoms have been managed with intratympanic steroid therapy. No satisfactory comparative effectiveness study to support this practice exists.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of oral vs intratympanic steroid to treat sudden sensorineural hearing loss.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Prospective, randomized, noninferiority trial involving 250 patients with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss presenting within 14 days of onset of 50 dB or higher of pure tone average (PTA) hearing threshold. The study was conducted from December 2004 through October 2009 at 16 academic community-based otology practices. Participants were followed up for 6 months.

INTERVENTION

One hundred twenty-one patients received either 60 mg/d of oral prednisone for 14 days with a 5-day taper and 129 patients received 4 doses over 14 days of 40 mg/mL of methylprednisolone injected into the middle ear.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary end point was change in hearing at 2 months after treatment. Noninferiority was defined as less than a 10-dB difference in hearing outcome between treatments.

RESULTS

In the oral prednisone group, PTA improved by 30.7 dB compared with a 28.7-dB improvement in the intratympanic treatment group. Mean pure tone average at 2 months was 56.0 for the oral steroid treatment group and 57.6 dB for the intratympanic treatment group. Recovery of hearing on oral treatment at 2 months by intention-to-treat analysis was 2.0 dB greater than intratympanic treatment (95.21% upper confidence interval, 6.6 dB). Per-protocol analysis confirmed the intention-to-treat result. Thus, the hypothesis of inferiority of intratympanic methylprednisolone to oral prednisone for primary treatment of sudden sensorineural hearing loss was rejected.

CONCLUSION

Among patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss, hearing level 2 months after treatment showed that intratympanic treatment was not inferior to oral prednisone treatment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00097448.

摘要

背景

特发性突发性聋已有 30 多年的口服皮质类固醇治疗史。最近,许多患者的症状已通过鼓室内类固醇治疗得到控制。目前尚无令人满意的比较有效性研究来支持这种治疗方法。

目的

比较口服与鼓室内类固醇治疗突发性聋的效果。

设计、地点和患者:2004 年 12 月至 2009 年 10 月,在 16 个学术性社区为基础的耳科诊所,对 250 例单侧感音神经性聋患者进行前瞻性、随机、非劣效性试验,这些患者在发病后 14 天内出现纯音平均听阈 50 dB 或更高的听力损失。参与者随访 6 个月。

干预措施

121 例患者接受 60 mg/d 泼尼松口服治疗 14 天,随后 5 天逐渐减量,129 例患者接受 4 次 40 mg/ml 甲泼尼龙鼓室内注射治疗,持续 14 天。

主要观察指标

主要终点为治疗后 2 个月时听力变化。非劣效性定义为两种治疗方法的听力结果差异小于 10 dB。

结果

口服泼尼松组的纯音平均听阈提高了 30.7 dB,而鼓室内治疗组提高了 28.7 dB。口服类固醇治疗组的平均纯音平均听阈在 2 个月时为 56.0 dB,鼓室内治疗组为 57.6 dB。2 个月时,意向治疗分析显示,口服类固醇治疗的听力恢复比鼓室内治疗高 2.0 dB(95.21%置信区间,6.6 dB)。按方案分析证实了意向治疗结果。因此,鼓室内甲泼尼龙治疗突发性聋的主要治疗效果不如口服泼尼松的假设被拒绝。

结论

在特发性突发性聋患者中,治疗 2 个月后的听力水平表明,鼓室内治疗并不逊于口服泼尼松治疗。

试验注册

clinicaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT00097448。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验