• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

建立专门的创伤服务体系后,长期绩效得到改善。

Long-lasting performance improvement after formalization of a dedicated trauma service.

作者信息

Groven Sigrid, Eken Torsten, Skaga Nils Oddvar, Roise Olav, Naess Paal Aksel, Gaarder Christine

机构信息

Department of Traumatology, Oslo University Hospital, Ulleval, Norway.

出版信息

J Trauma. 2011 Mar;70(3):569-74. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31820d1a9b.

DOI:10.1097/TA.0b013e31820d1a9b
PMID:21610344
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Few studies have evaluated intrainstitutional improvement of trauma care. We hypothesized that the formalization of a dedicated multidisciplinary trauma service in a major Scandinavian trauma center in 2005 would result in improved outcome.

METHODS

Institutional trauma registry data for 7,243 consecutive patients from the years 2002-2008 were retrospectively evaluated using variable life-adjusted display (VLAD) as one of several performance indicators. VLAD is a refinement of the cumulative sum method that adjusts death and survival by each patient's risk status (probability of survival) and provides a graphical display of performance over time. Probability of survival was calculated according to Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) methodology with National Trauma Data Bank 2005 coefficients.

RESULTS

VLAD demonstrated a sharp increase in cumulative survival starting at the beginning of 2005 and continuing linearly throughout the study period, amounting to 68 additional saved lives. The increase was mainly caused by improved survival among the critically injured (injury severity score 25-75). A cutoff point t0 for analysis of differences between time periods was set at January 1, 2005, coinciding with the formalization of a dedicated trauma service. Mortality in the whole trauma population showed a 33% decrease after t0. W-statistics confirmed the increased survival to be significant. There were no significant changes in age, gender, or injury mechanism. Injury severity score decreased, but differences in case mix were adjusted for in the survival prediction model.

CONCLUSION

We have shown that the start of the long-lasting performance improvement coincided with formalization of a dedicated trauma service, providing increased multidisciplinary focus on all aspects of trauma care.

摘要

背景

很少有研究评估创伤护理在机构内部的改善情况。我们假设,2005年在斯堪的纳维亚半岛一家大型创伤中心设立专门的多学科创伤服务机构会带来更好的治疗效果。

方法

回顾性评估了2002年至2008年期间连续7243例患者的机构创伤登记数据,使用可变寿命调整显示(VLAD)作为多项绩效指标之一。VLAD是累积和方法的改进,通过每位患者的风险状态(生存概率)调整死亡和生存情况,并以图形方式展示随时间的绩效。生存概率根据创伤和损伤严重程度评分(TRISS)方法及2005年国家创伤数据库系数进行计算。

结果

VLAD显示,从2005年初开始累积生存率急剧上升,并在整个研究期间呈线性持续上升,额外挽救了68条生命。这一增长主要是由于重伤患者(损伤严重程度评分为25 - 75)的生存率提高。将分析不同时间段差异的分界点t0设定为2005年1月1日,这与专门创伤服务机构的设立时间一致。t0之后,整个创伤人群的死亡率下降了33%。W统计量证实生存率的提高具有显著性。年龄、性别或损伤机制没有显著变化。损伤严重程度评分有所下降,但在生存预测模型中对病例组合的差异进行了调整。

结论

我们已经表明,长期的绩效改善始于专门创伤服务机构的设立,这使得多学科对创伤护理的各个方面给予了更多关注。

相似文献

1
Long-lasting performance improvement after formalization of a dedicated trauma service.建立专门的创伤服务体系后,长期绩效得到改善。
J Trauma. 2011 Mar;70(3):569-74. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31820d1a9b.
2
Enhanced trauma program commitment at a level I trauma center: effect on the process and outcome of care.一级创伤中心加强创伤项目投入:对护理过程及结果的影响
Arch Surg. 2003 Aug;138(8):838-43. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.138.8.838.
3
Trauma quality improvement using risk-adjusted outcomes.使用风险调整后的结果改进创伤质量。
J Trauma. 2008 Mar;64(3):599-604; discussion 604-6. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31816533f9.
4
Are all trauma centers created equally? A statewide analysis.所有创伤中心都是一样的吗?全州范围的分析。
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Jul;17(7):701-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00786.x.
5
Does a category II trauma activation warrant the initial presence of an attending trauma surgeon?二级创伤激活是否需要创伤外科主治医生最初在场?
J Emerg Med. 2010 Sep;39(3):356-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.10.021. Epub 2009 Mar 9.
6
First echelon hospital care before trauma center transfer in a rural trauma system: does it affect outcome?农村创伤系统中创伤中心转运前的一级医院护理:它会影响治疗结果吗?
J Trauma. 2010 Dec;69(6):1362-6. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181d75250.
7
Moving beyond personnel and process: a case for incorporating outcome measures in the trauma center designation process.超越人员与流程:在创伤中心指定过程中纳入结果指标的理由。
Arch Surg. 2008 Feb;143(2):115-9; discussion 120. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2007.29.
8
Resource commitment to improve outcomes and increase value at a level I trauma center.在一级创伤中心投入资源以改善治疗效果并提升价值。
J Trauma. 2011 Mar;70(3):560-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31820c7b79.
9
Surgical quality improvement: a simplified method to apply national standards to pediatric trauma care.外科质量改进:一种将国家标准应用于儿童创伤护理的简化方法。
J Pediatr Surg. 2009 Jan;44(1):156-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.10.119.
10
Assessing quality of care in a trauma referral center: benchmarking performance by TRISS-based statistics or by analysis of stratified ISS data?评估创伤转诊中心的医疗质量:通过基于TRISS的统计数据还是分层ISS数据分析来衡量绩效?
J Trauma. 2006 Mar;60(3):538-47. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000205613.52586.d1.

引用本文的文献

1
Organised trauma systems and designated trauma centres for improving outcomes in injured patients.用于改善受伤患者治疗效果的有组织创伤系统和指定创伤中心。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):CD012500. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012500.pub2.
2
Pediatric renal trauma: 17 years of experience at a major Scandinavian trauma center.小儿肾创伤:斯堪的纳维亚一家主要创伤中心的17年经验
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2023 Nov 14;8(1):e001207. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2023-001207. eCollection 2023.
3
Severely injured patients: modern management strategies.
重伤患者:现代管理策略
EFORT Open Rev. 2023 May 9;8(5):382-396. doi: 10.1530/EOR-23-0053.
4
Improvement in geriatric trauma outcomes in an evolving trauma system.在不断发展的创伤系统中改善老年创伤患者的治疗效果。
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2019 Apr 25;4(1):e000282. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2018-000282. eCollection 2019.
5
Randomized Controlled Trials of Rehabilitation Services in the Post-acute Phase of Moderate and Severe Traumatic Brain Injury - A Systematic Review.中重度创伤性脑损伤急性期后康复服务的随机对照试验——一项系统评价
Front Neurol. 2019 Jun 6;10:557. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00557. eCollection 2019.
6
Decreased mortality, laparotomy, and embolization rates for liver injuries during a 13-year period in a major Scandinavian trauma center.在一家主要的斯堪的纳维亚创伤中心,13年间肝脏损伤的死亡率、剖腹手术率和栓塞率均有所下降。
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2018 Nov 5;3(1):e000205. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2018-000205. eCollection 2018.
7
Treatment of splenic trauma in Norway: a retrospective cohort study.挪威脾创伤治疗:回顾性队列研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Nov 23;25(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0457-y.
8
Validating performance of TRISS, TARN and NORMIT survival prediction models in a Norwegian trauma population.验证TRISS、TARN和NORMIT生存预测模型在挪威创伤人群中的性能。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2018 Feb;62(2):253-266. doi: 10.1111/aas.13029. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
9
Comparison of risk-adjusted survival in two Scandinavian Level-I trauma centres.两个斯堪的纳维亚一级创伤中心风险调整后生存率的比较。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016 May 10;24:66. doi: 10.1186/s13049-016-0257-9.
10
Combining the new injury severity score with an anatomical polytrauma injury variable predicts mortality better than the new injury severity score and the injury severity score: a retrospective cohort study.将新损伤严重程度评分与解剖学多发伤损伤变量相结合,比新损伤严重程度评分和损伤严重程度评分能更好地预测死亡率:一项回顾性队列研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016 Mar 8;24:25. doi: 10.1186/s13049-016-0215-6.