Suppr超能文献

普氏手法评估早产儿、足月儿及小婴儿整体运动的两种评估者间及评估者内的一致性。

Inter- and intra-observer agreement of Prechtl's method on the qualitative assessment of general movements in preterm, term and young infants.

机构信息

Physiotherapy Institute, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Switzerland.

出版信息

Early Hum Dev. 2011 Sep;87(9):633-9. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2011.04.017. Epub 2011 May 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prechtl's method on the qualitative assessment of general movements (GMs) has been shown to be a good predictor of neurological outcome. There is substantial evidence that this method has good inter- and intra-observer agreement.

AIMS

We wanted to find out whether this high agreement is reproducible in the clinical setting.

STUDY DESIGN

Reliability study (inter- and intra-observer agreement).

SUBJECTS

Twenty video-sequences of children at the age of preterm and writhing movements (31-41 weeks postmenstrual age) and 10 video-sequences of children at the fidgety movements age (49-54 weeks postmenstrual age) were rated by five physiotherapists.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Intra- and inter-observer agreements were analyzed with percentage agreement and with nominal kappa statistic with bootstrapped bias corrected 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

We found fair to substantial inter-observer reliability for the six response categories (time-point 1(t1): median kappa 0.44, range 0.27 to 0.59, time-point 2 (t2): median kappa 0.55, range 0.41 to 0.77) and fair to almost perfect for the normal/abnormal ratings (t1: median kappa 0.53, range 0.29 to 0.61, t2: median kappa 0.63, range 0.29 to 0.85). There was statistically significant improvement from t1 to t2 for the six response categories. The intra-observer reliability for the 9-week interval was moderate to almost perfect (median kappa 0.68, range 0.41 to 0.86).

CONCLUSIONS

We were not able to exactly reproduce the generally very good results. In our clinical setting now videos are evaluated by at least two trained therapists and the results are discussed, if necessary, to reach a consensus.

摘要

背景

普莱希特(Prechtl)的运动质量评估方法(GMs)已被证明是神经预后的良好预测指标。有大量证据表明,该方法具有良好的观察者间和观察者内一致性。

目的

我们想了解这种高度一致性在临床环境中是否具有可重复性。

研究设计

可靠性研究(观察者间和观察者内一致性)。

受试者

20 段早产儿扭动运动(胎龄 31-41 周)和 10 段不安运动(胎龄 49-54 周)视频序列由五名物理治疗师进行评估。

测量指标

采用百分比一致性和名义 kappa 统计量(带 bootstrap 偏置校正的 95%置信区间)分析观察者间和观察者内的一致性。

结果

我们发现,对于六个反应类别,观察者间的可靠性为一般至高度可靠(时间点 1(t1):中位数kappa 值为 0.44,范围为 0.27 至 0.59,时间点 2(t2):中位数 kappa 值为 0.55,范围为 0.41 至 0.77),对于正常/异常评级,观察者间的可靠性为一般至近乎完美(t1:中位数 kappa 值为 0.53,范围为 0.29 至 0.61,t2:中位数 kappa 值为 0.63,范围为 0.29 至 0.85)。与 t1 相比,六个反应类别的结果在 t2 时有所改善。9 周间隔的观察者内可靠性为中度至近乎完美(中位数 kappa 值为 0.68,范围为 0.41 至 0.86)。

结论

我们无法完全重现通常非常好的结果。在我们的临床环境中,现在视频由至少两名经过培训的治疗师进行评估,如果需要,会进行讨论以达成共识。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验