Suppr超能文献

日本多动动作评估准确性调查。

Fidgety Movements Assessment Accuracy Survey in Japan.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Oita 879-5593, Japan.

Division of Neonatology, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 20;18(24):13428. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413428.

Abstract

To investigate the accuracy of fidgety movements (FMs) assessment in Japanese assessors. Sixty specialists participated in the first survey. Of the participants, 18 were assessors certified by the GMs basic-training course. The surveys were composed of FMs assessment of 20 video clips. The correct assessment rates (CARs) were investigated. The survey videos were judged into three types: normal (F + +, F +), abnormal (AF) and absent (F + -, F -). After the first survey, each participant performed a self-learning exercise using clips of the first survey. The follow-up survey was conducted three months after the first survey. The median CAR of the first survey was 65% in certified assessors and 50% in noncertified assessors. The median CARs of certified assessors were significantly higher than that of noncertified assessors for all clips and for normal FMs and AF clips ( < 0.01). After 3 months of self-learning exercise the CARs in each judgement type improved in 28 follow-up survey participants. Their median CAR improved from 60% in the first survey to 84% in the follow-up survey. To practise general movements assessment (GMA), course certification is required. The self-learning exercise with the confirmed judgement FMs clips may be effective for improving the ability of FMs judgement.

摘要

为了研究日本评估者烦躁运动(FM)评估的准确性。60 名专家参加了第一次调查。在参与者中,有 18 名是 GM 基础培训课程认证的评估者。调查由 20 个视频片段的 FM 评估组成。调查了正确评估率(CAR)。将调查视频判断为三种类型:正常(F++,F+),异常(AF)和缺失(F+-,F-)。第一次调查后,每位参与者使用第一次调查的剪辑进行了自学练习。三个月后进行了后续调查。第一次调查的中位数 CAR 为认证评估者的 65%,非认证评估者的 50%。对于所有剪辑以及正常 FM 和 AF 剪辑,认证评估者的中位数 CAR 均明显高于非认证评估者(<0.01)。经过 3 个月的自学练习,在 28 名后续调查参与者中,每种判断类型的 CAR 都有所提高。他们的中位数 CAR 从第一次调查的 60%提高到了后续调查的 84%。为了练习全面运动评估(GMA),需要课程认证。使用已确认的判断 FM 剪辑进行自学练习可能有助于提高 FM 判断能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a2a/8705354/5cb0550b2437/ijerph-18-13428-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验