• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非线性随机反卷积与块循环奇异值分解在定量动态磁敏感对比磁共振成像中的临床数据评估。

Assessment of clinical data of nonlinear stochastic deconvolution versus block-circulant singular value decomposition for quantitative dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging.

机构信息

Department of Information Engineering, University of Padova, Padova 35131, Italy.

出版信息

Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Sep;29(7):927-36. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2011.02.006. Epub 2011 May 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.mri.2011.02.006
PMID:21616625
Abstract

Dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging (DSC-MRI) allows the noninvasive assessment of brain hemodynamics alterations by quantifying, via deconvolution, the cerebral blood flow (CBF) and mean transit time (MTT). Singular value decomposition (SVD) and block-circulant SVD (cSVD) are the most widely adopted deconvolution method, although they bear some limitations, including unphysiological oscillations in the residue function and bias in the presence of delay and dispersion between the tissue and the arterial input function. A nonlinear stochastic regularization (NSR) has been proposed, which performs better than SVD and cSVD on simulated data both in the presence and absence of dispersion. Moreover, NSR allows to quantify the dispersion level. Here, cSVD and NSR are compared for the first time on a group of nine patients with severe atherosclerotic unilateral stenosis of internal carotid artery before and after carotid stenting to investigate the effect of arterial dispersion. According to region of interest-based analysis, NSR characterizes the pathologic tissue more accurately than cSVD, thus improving the quality of the information provided to physicians for diagnosis. In fact, in 7 (78%) of the 9 subjects, CBF and MTT maps provided by NSR allow to correctly identify the pathologic hemisphere to the physician. Moreover, by emphasizing the difference between pathologic and healthy tissues, NSR may be successfully used to monitor the subject's recovery after the treatment and/or surgery. NSR also generates dispersion level and non-dispersed CBF and MTT maps. The dispersion level provides information on CBF and MTT estimates reliability and may also be used as a clinical indicator of pathological tissue state complementary to CBF and MTT, thus increasing the clinical information provided by DSC-MRI analysis.

摘要

动态磁敏感对比磁共振成像(DSC-MRI)通过对脑血流(CBF)和平均通过时间(MTT)进行反卷积,可无创评估脑血流动力学变化。奇异值分解(SVD)和块循环奇异值分解(cSVD)是最广泛采用的反卷积方法,但它们存在一些局限性,包括残差函数中的非生理振荡和在存在延迟和组织与动脉输入函数之间的弥散时的偏差。已经提出了一种非线性随机正则化(NSR),它在存在和不存在弥散的情况下,在模拟数据上的表现均优于 SVD 和 cSVD。此外,NSR 允许量化弥散水平。在此,首次在 9 例严重动脉粥样硬化性颈内动脉单侧狭窄的患者在颈动脉支架置入术前后的组中比较了 cSVD 和 NSR,以研究动脉弥散的影响。根据基于感兴趣区域的分析,NSR 比 cSVD 更准确地描述病变组织,从而提高了为诊断提供给医生的信息质量。实际上,在 9 名患者中的 7 名(78%)中,NSR 提供的 CBF 和 MTT 图可让医生正确识别病变半球。此外,通过强调病变组织和健康组织之间的差异,NSR 可成功用于监测患者在治疗和/或手术后的恢复情况。NSR 还生成弥散水平和无弥散 CBF 和 MTT 图。弥散水平提供了有关 CBF 和 MTT 估计可靠性的信息,也可以用作补充 CBF 和 MTT 的病变组织状态的临床指标,从而增加了 DSC-MRI 分析提供的临床信息。

相似文献

1
Assessment of clinical data of nonlinear stochastic deconvolution versus block-circulant singular value decomposition for quantitative dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging.非线性随机反卷积与块循环奇异值分解在定量动态磁敏感对比磁共振成像中的临床数据评估。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Sep;29(7):927-36. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2011.02.006. Epub 2011 May 25.
2
Nonlinear stochastic regularization to characterize tissue residue function in bolus-tracking MRI: assessment and comparison with SVD, block-circulant SVD, and Tikhonov.
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2009 May;56(5):1287-97. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2009.2013820. Epub 2009 Feb 2.
3
Perfusion quantification by model-free arterial spin labeling using nonlinear stochastic regularization deconvolution.基于非线性随机正则化反卷积的无模型动脉自旋标记灌注定量。
Magn Reson Med. 2013 Nov;70(5):1470-80. doi: 10.1002/mrm.24587. Epub 2012 Dec 27.
4
Tracer delay correction of cerebral blood flow with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI.利用动态磁敏感对比增强磁共振成像进行脑血流的示踪剂延迟校正
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2005 Mar;25(3):378-90. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600037.
5
Stable spline deconvolution for dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI.稳定样条反卷积在动态磁敏感对比 MRI 中的应用。
Magn Reson Med. 2017 Nov;78(5):1801-1811. doi: 10.1002/mrm.26582. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
6
Deconvolution with simple extrapolation for improved cerebral blood flow measurement in dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging during acute ischemic stroke.利用简单外推的去卷积方法提高急性缺血性脑卒中时动态磁敏感对比磁共振成像的脑血流测量精度。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Jun;29(5):620-9. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2011.02.024. Epub 2011 May 5.
7
Reference-based maximum upslope: a CBF quantification method without using arterial input function in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI.基于参考的最大上升斜率:一种无需在动态磁敏感对比 MRI 中使用动脉输入函数的 CBF 定量方法。
Magn Reson Med Sci. 2009;8(3):107-20. doi: 10.2463/mrms.8.107.
8
Tracer arrival timing-insensitive technique for estimating flow in MR perfusion-weighted imaging using singular value decomposition with a block-circulant deconvolution matrix.使用具有块循环反卷积矩阵的奇异值分解来估计磁共振灌注加权成像中血流的示踪剂到达时间不敏感技术。
Magn Reson Med. 2003 Jul;50(1):164-74. doi: 10.1002/mrm.10522.
9
Reassessing the clinical efficacy of two MR quantitative DSC PWI CBF algorithms following cross-calibration with PET images.在与PET图像进行交叉校准后,重新评估两种MR定量DSC PWI CBF算法的临床疗效。
Phys Med Biol. 2005 Mar 21;50(6):1251-63. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/50/6/014. Epub 2005 Mar 2.
10
Quantification of bolus-tracking MRI: Improved characterization of the tissue residue function using Tikhonov regularization.
Magn Reson Med. 2003 Dec;50(6):1237-47. doi: 10.1002/mrm.10643.

引用本文的文献

1
Heterogeneity of cortical lesions in multiple sclerosis: an MRI perfusion study.多发性硬化症皮质病变的异质性:磁共振灌注研究。
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2013 Mar;33(3):457-63. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2012.192. Epub 2012 Dec 19.