Department of Neuroimage, Scientific Institute IRCCS "Eugenio Medea", Bosisio Parini, Italy.
Department of Information Engineering at the University of Padova, Italy.
Magn Reson Med. 2017 Nov;78(5):1801-1811. doi: 10.1002/mrm.26582. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
To present the stable spline (SS) deconvolution method for the quantification of the cerebral blood flow (CBF) from dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI.
The SS method was compared with both the block-circulant singular value decomposition (oSVD) and nonlinear stochastic regularization (NSR) methods. oSVD is one of the most popular deconvolution methods in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI (DSC-MRI). NSR is an alternative approach that we proposed previously. The three methods were compared using simulated data and two clinical data sets.
The SS method correctly reconstructed the dispersed residue function and its peak in presence of dispersion, regardless of the delay. In absence of dispersion, SS performs similarly to oSVD and does not correctly reconstruct the residue function and its peak. SS and NSR better differentiate healthy and pathologic CBF values compared with oSVD in all simulated conditions. Using acquired data, SS and NSR provide more clinically plausible and physiological estimates of the residue function and CBF maps compared with oSVD.
The SS method overcomes some of the limitations of oSVD, such as unphysiological estimates of the residue function and NSR, the latter of which is too computationally expensive to be applied to large data sets. Thus, the SS method is a valuable alternative for CBF quantification using DSC-MRI data. Magn Reson Med 78:1801-1811, 2017. © 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
介绍稳定样条(SS)去卷积方法,用于从动态对比磁共振成像(DSC-MRI)量化脑血流(CBF)。
将 SS 方法与块循环奇异值分解(oSVD)和非线性随机正则化(NSR)方法进行比较。oSVD 是 DSC-MRI 中最流行的去卷积方法之一。NSR 是我们之前提出的一种替代方法。使用模拟数据和两个临床数据集比较了这三种方法。
SS 方法正确重建了弥散残差函数及其在存在弥散的情况下的峰值,而与延迟无关。在不存在弥散的情况下,SS 与 oSVD 表现相似,无法正确重建残差函数及其峰值。在所有模拟条件下,SS 和 NSR 比 oSVD 更好地区分健康和病理 CBF 值。使用采集的数据,SS 和 NSR 比 oSVD 提供了更符合临床实际和生理的残差函数和 CBF 图估计。
SS 方法克服了 oSVD 的一些局限性,例如残差函数的非生理估计,而 NSR 后者计算成本太高,无法应用于大型数据集。因此,SS 方法是 DSC-MRI 数据 CBF 量化的一种有价值的替代方法。磁共振医学 78:1801-1811,2017。©2017 年国际磁共振学会。