Ontario HIV Treatment Network, Toronto, Canada.
Implement Sci. 2011 May 28;6:54. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-54.
Community-based organizations (CBOs) are important stakeholders in health systems and are increasingly called upon to use research evidence to inform their advocacy, program planning, and service delivery. To better support CBOs to find and use research evidence, we sought to assess the capacity of CBOs in the HIV/AIDS sector to acquire, assess, adapt, and apply research evidence in their work.
We invited executive directors of HIV/AIDS CBOs in Ontario, Canada (n = 51) to complete the Canadian Health Services Research Foundation's "Is Research Working for You?" survey.
Based on responses from 25 organizations that collectively provide services to approximately 32,000 clients per year with 290 full-time equivalent staff, we found organizational capacity to acquire, assess, adapt, and apply research evidence to be low. CBO strengths include supporting a culture that rewards flexibility and quality improvement, exchanging information within their organization, and ensuring that their decision-making processes have a place for research. However, CBO Executive Directors indicated that they lacked the skills, time, resources, incentives, and links with experts to acquire research, assess its quality and reliability, and summarize it in a user-friendly way.
Given the limited capacity to find and use research evidence, we recommend a capacity-building strategy for HIV/AIDS CBOs that focuses on providing the tools, resources, and skills needed to more consistently acquire, assess, adapt, and apply research evidence. Such a strategy may be appropriate in other sectors and jurisdictions as well given that CBO Executive Directors in the HIV/AIDS sector in Ontario report low capacity despite being in the enviable position of having stable government infrastructure in place to support them, benefiting from long-standing investment in capacity building, and being part of an active provincial network. CBOs in other sectors and jurisdictions that have fewer supports may have comparable or lower capacity. Future research should examine a larger sample of CBO Executive Directors from a range of sectors and jurisdictions.
社区组织(CBOs)是卫生系统的重要利益相关者,越来越多地被要求利用研究证据为其宣传、规划和服务提供信息。为了更好地支持 CBOs 查找和使用研究证据,我们评估了艾滋病毒/艾滋病领域的 CBOs 在其工作中获取、评估、改编和应用研究证据的能力。
我们邀请了加拿大安大略省艾滋病毒/艾滋病 CBO 的执行董事(n = 51)完成加拿大卫生服务研究基金会的“研究是否对您有效?”调查。
基于 25 个组织的答复,这些组织每年为大约 32000 名客户提供服务,拥有 290 名全职等效员工,我们发现组织获取、评估、改编和应用研究证据的能力较低。CBO 的优势包括支持奖励灵活性和质量改进的文化,在组织内部交流信息,并确保其决策过程中有研究的位置。然而,CBO 执行董事表示,他们缺乏获取研究、评估其质量和可靠性以及以用户友好的方式总结研究的技能、时间、资源、激励措施和与专家的联系。
鉴于发现和使用研究证据的能力有限,我们建议为艾滋病毒/艾滋病 CBO 制定一项能力建设战略,重点是提供获取、评估、改编和应用研究证据所需的工具、资源和技能。鉴于安大略省艾滋病毒/艾滋病领域的 CBO 执行董事报告称能力较低,尽管他们处于有利的地位,拥有稳定的政府基础设施来支持他们,受益于长期投资于能力建设,并成为活跃的省级网络的一部分,这种策略在其他部门和司法管辖区也可能是合适的。其他部门和司法管辖区中支持较少的 CBO 可能具有类似或更低的能力。未来的研究应从一系列部门和司法管辖区中检查更大的 CBO 执行董事样本。