• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评价加拿大安大略省面向社区组织的 HIV 特定快速反应服务。

Evaluation of an HIV-specific rapid response service for community-based organisations in Ontario, Canada.

机构信息

The Ontario HIV Treatment Network, 1300 Yonge Street, Suite 600, Toronto, Ontario, M4T 1X3, Canada.

Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster Health Forum, 1280 Main St West, MML-417, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4L6, Canada.

出版信息

Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Aug 14;17(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0476-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12961-019-0476-4
PMID:31412942
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6693275/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To support AIDS service organisations and other community-based organisations' use of research evidence to inform HIV-related programmes, services and policies, the Ontario HIV Treatment Network (OHTN) developed a Rapid Response Service. The final product of the rapid response process at the OHTN, which is more streamlined than that of traditional systematic reviews, consists of a detailed report answering questions regarding an HIV-specific issue and how the findings apply within the local context. In 2016, the OHTN conducted an evaluation to assess the effectiveness of its Rapid Response Service. This article reports on the development of this service as well as the results of the evaluation.

METHODS

All rapid responses published between January 1, 2009, and September 30, 2016, by the OHTN (n = 102) were analysed using univariate analyses. Frequency distributions were determined for the following variables for each rapid response: populations observed, topics covered, requestor affiliations and number of downloads from the OHTN's website. Requestors of rapid responses were also interviewed regarding perceived helpfulness and utility of the service and final products, and suggestions for changes to the service. Six-month follow-up interviews were conducted to determine how affiliated organisations used the evidence from the rapid response they requested.

RESULTS

The 102 rapid responses published covered 14 different populations of interest. Topics covered included the HIV prevention, engagement and care cascade, determinants of health, syndemics, and comorbidities. Requestor affiliations consisted of AIDS service organisations, government agencies and policy-makers, non-HIV-focused community-based organisations, and hospitals, universities or health centres. Requestors perceived most aspects of the Rapid Response Service as very helpful and most frequently suggested that the rapid responses should provide recommendations. Follow-up interviews regarding the impact of rapid responses show that rapid responses have been used to assist organisations in numerous activities.

CONCLUSIONS

Organisations that have used the OHTN's Rapid Response Service describe it as a valuable service useful for the development of programmes and policies. Improvements in capacity-building efforts may increase its utility. Describing the findings of this evaluation may serve as a reference for similar programmes to increase the use of research evidence among public health decision-makers.

摘要

背景

为了支持艾滋病服务组织和其他基于社区的组织利用研究证据为艾滋病毒相关方案、服务和政策提供信息,安大略省艾滋病毒治疗网络(OHTN)开发了快速反应服务。OHTN 的快速反应过程的最终产品比传统的系统评价更精简,由一份详细的报告组成,回答有关艾滋病毒特定问题的问题,以及研究结果如何适应当地情况。2016 年,OHTN 进行了一项评估,以评估其快速反应服务的有效性。本文报告了该服务的开发以及评估结果。

方法

对 OHTN 2009 年 1 月 1 日至 2016 年 9 月 30 日期间发布的所有快速反应(n=102)进行了单变量分析。对每个快速反应的以下变量进行了频率分布:观察到的人群、涵盖的主题、请求者的隶属关系以及从 OHTN 网站下载的次数。还对快速反应的请求者进行了访谈,了解他们对服务和最终产品的有用性和实用性的看法,以及对服务的改进建议。进行了六个月的后续访谈,以确定相关组织如何利用他们请求的快速反应中的证据。

结果

发布的 102 份快速反应涵盖了 14 个不同的目标人群。涵盖的主题包括艾滋病毒预防、参与和护理级联、健康决定因素、综合疾病和合并症。请求者的隶属关系包括艾滋病服务组织、政府机构和决策者、非艾滋病毒为重点的社区组织以及医院、大学或保健中心。请求者认为快速反应服务的大多数方面都非常有帮助,并且最常建议快速反应应该提供建议。关于快速反应影响的后续访谈表明,快速反应已被用于协助组织开展众多活动。

结论

使用 OHTN 快速反应服务的组织将其描述为一项有价值的服务,可用于制定方案和政策。加强能力建设工作可能会提高其效用。描述这项评估的结果可以为类似的项目提供参考,以增加公共卫生决策者对研究证据的使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff58/6693275/f298eeeb6a59/12961_2019_476_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff58/6693275/f298eeeb6a59/12961_2019_476_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff58/6693275/f298eeeb6a59/12961_2019_476_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of an HIV-specific rapid response service for community-based organisations in Ontario, Canada.评价加拿大安大略省面向社区组织的 HIV 特定快速反应服务。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Aug 14;17(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0476-4.
2
Effects of an evidence service on community-based AIDS service organizations' use of research evidence: a protocol for a randomized controlled trial.基于证据的服务对社区艾滋病服务组织使用研究证据的影响:一项随机对照试验方案。
Implement Sci. 2011 May 27;6:52. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-52.
3
A taxonomy for community-based care programs focused on HIV/AIDS prevention, treatment, and care in resource-poor settings.以资源匮乏地区的艾滋病病毒/艾滋病预防、治疗和护理为重点的基于社区的护理方案分类法。
Glob Health Action. 2013 Apr 16;6:1-21. doi: 10.3402/gha.v6i0.20548.
4
An Ontario initiative to enhance the effectiveness of AIDS Service Organizations: Community-Linked Evaluation of AIDS Resources.安大略省一项旨在提高艾滋病服务组织效率的举措:艾滋病资源的社区关联评估。
J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2005 Mar-Apr;16(2):49-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jana.2005.01.005.
5
[Implementation of a continuum of care for people living with HIV/AIDS in Hanoi (Vietnam)].[越南河内为艾滋病毒/艾滋病感染者提供连续护理的实施情况]
Sante. 2009 Jul-Sep;19(3):141-8. doi: 10.1684/san.2009.0169.
6
[Community organizations and fighting STDs, HIV and AIDS in Montreal: lessons for sub-Saharan Africa].[蒙特利尔的社区组织与抗击性传播疾病、艾滋病毒和艾滋病:撒哈拉以南非洲的经验教训]
Sante. 2010 Apr-Jun;20(2):116-24. doi: 10.1684/san.2010.0185. Epub 2010 Aug 5.
7
Meaningful involvement of people living with HIV/AIDS in Uganda through linkages between network groups and health facilities: an evaluation study.通过网络团体与卫生机构之间的联系,使乌干达艾滋病毒/艾滋病感染者有意义地参与其中:一项评价研究。
Psychol Health Med. 2012;17(2):213-22. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2011.592844. Epub 2011 Jul 21.
8
The chief scientist reports ... co-ordination of care on discharge from hospital into the community for patients with HIV/AIDS in Lothian.首席科学家报告了……洛锡安地区艾滋病毒/艾滋病患者出院后进入社区的护理协调情况。
Health Bull (Edinb). 1997 Sep;55(5):338-50.
9
From end of life to chronic care: the provision of community home-based care for HIV and the adaptation to new health care demands in Zambia.从临终关怀到长期护理:赞比亚为艾滋病毒感染者提供社区居家护理及适应新的医疗需求情况
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2016 Nov;17(6):599-610. doi: 10.1017/S146342361600030X. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
10
The Greater Involvement of People Living with AIDS principle: theory versus practice in Ontario's HIV/AIDS community-based research sector.艾滋病感染者更大程度参与原则:安大略省基于社区的艾滋病毒/艾滋病研究领域的理论与实践
AIDS Care. 2008 Jul;20(6):615-24. doi: 10.1080/09540120701661690.

引用本文的文献

1
Paper 3: Selecting rapid review methods for complex questions related to health policy and system issues.论文 3:选择针对与卫生政策和体系问题相关的复杂问题的快速审查方法。
Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 30;10(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01834-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Using rapid reviews to strengthen health policy and systems and progress towards universal health coverage.利用快速综述加强卫生政策与系统以及推动全民健康覆盖进展。
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Feb 5;4(1):e001178. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001178. eCollection 2019.
2
Embracing complexity and uncertainty to create impact: exploring the processes and transformative potential of co-produced research through development of a social impact model.拥抱复杂性和不确定性以产生影响:通过开发社会影响模型探索共同产生的研究的过程和变革潜力。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Dec 11;16(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0375-0.
3
Increasing the use of research in population health policies and programs: a rapid review.
提高研究在人群健康政策和项目中的应用:一项快速综述
Public Health Res Pract. 2018 Sep 27;28(3):2831816. doi: 10.17061/phrp2831816.
4
HIV in Canada-Surveillance Report, 2016.《2016年加拿大艾滋病毒监测报告》
Can Commun Dis Rep. 2017 Dec 7;43(12):248-256. doi: 10.14745/ccdr.v43i12a01.
5
Do policy-makers find commissioned rapid reviews useful?决策者认为委托进行的快速审查有用吗?
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Feb 26;16(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0293-1.
6
Engaging policy-makers, health system managers, and policy analysts in the knowledge synthesis process: a scoping review.使政策制定者、卫生系统管理者和政策分析师参与知识综合过程:范围综述。
Implement Sci. 2018 Feb 12;13(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0717-x.
7
Policymaker experiences with rapid response briefs to address health-system and technology questions in Uganda.政策制定者运用快速反应简报解决乌干达卫生系统和技术问题的经验。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 May 3;15(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0200-1.
8
Co-occurring epidemics, syndemics, and population health.共现流行病、综合征以及人群健康。
Lancet. 2017 Mar 4;389(10072):978-982. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30403-8.
9
Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry.利用PROSPERO注册库的数据,分析对医学干预措施进行系统评价所需的时间和人员。
BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 27;7(2):e012545. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012545.
10
Fit for purpose: perspectives on rapid reviews from end-user interviews.适用目的:来自终端用户访谈的快速综述观点
Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 17;6(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0425-7.