Karagatzides Jim D, Ellison Aaron M
Harvard University, Harvard Forest, 324 North Main Street, Petersham, Massachusetts 01366 USA.
Am J Bot. 2009 Sep;96(9):1612-9. doi: 10.3732/ajb.0900054. Epub 2009 Aug 13.
Understanding how different plant species and functional types "invest" carbon and nutrients is a major goal of plant ecologists. Two measures of such investments are "construction costs" (carbon needed to produce each gram of tissue) and associated "payback times" for photosynthesis to recover construction costs. These measurements integrate among traits used to assess leaf-trait scaling relationships. Carnivorous plants are model systems for examining mechanisms of leaf-trait coordination, but no studies have measured simultaneously construction costs of carnivorous traps and their photosynthetic rates to determine payback times of traps. We measured mass-based construction costs (CC(mass)) and photosynthesis (A(mass)) for traps, leaves, roots, and rhizomes of 15 carnivorous plant species grown under greenhouse conditions. There were highly significant differences among species in CC(mass) for each structure. Mean CC(mass) of carnivorous traps (1.14 ± 0.24 g glucose/g dry mass) was significantly lower than CC(mass) of leaves of 267 noncarnivorous plant species (1.47 ± 0.17), but all carnivorous plants examined had very low A(mass) and thus, long payback times (495-1551 h). Our results provide the first clear estimates of the marginal benefits of botanical carnivory and place carnivorous plants at the "slow and tough" end of the universal spectrum of leaf traits.
了解不同植物物种和功能类型如何“投入”碳和养分是植物生态学家的一个主要目标。这种投入的两个衡量指标是“构建成本”(生产每克组织所需的碳)以及光合作用恢复构建成本的相关“回收期”。这些测量整合了用于评估叶性状缩放关系的性状。食虫植物是研究叶性状协调机制的模型系统,但尚无研究同时测量食虫陷阱的构建成本及其光合速率以确定陷阱的回收期。我们测量了温室条件下生长的15种食虫植物物种的陷阱、叶片、根和根茎的基于质量的构建成本(CC(质量))和光合作用(A(质量))。每种结构的CC(质量)在物种间存在极显著差异。食虫陷阱的平均CC(质量)(1.14±0.24克葡萄糖/克干质量)显著低于267种非食虫植物物种叶片的CC(质量)(1.47±0.17),但所有研究的食虫植物的A(质量)都很低,因此回收期很长(495 - 1551小时)。我们的结果首次明确估计了植物食虫性的边际效益,并将食虫植物置于叶性状普遍范围的“缓慢且坚韧”一端。